A two-step FEM-SEM approach for wave propagation analysis in cable structures

Abstract Vibration-based methods are among the most widely studied in structural health monitoring (SHM). It is well known, however, that the low-order modes, characterizing the global dynamic behaviour of structures, are relatively insensitive to local damage. Such local damage may be easier to detect by methods based on wave propagation which involve local high frequency behaviour. The present work considers the numerical analysis of wave propagation in cables. A two-step approach is proposed which allows taking into account the cable sag and the distribution of the axial forces in the wave propagation analysis. In the first step, the static deformation and internal forces are obtained by the finite element method (FEM), taking into account geometric nonlinear effects. In the second step, the results from the static analysis are used to define the initial state of the dynamic analysis which is performed by means of the spectral element method (SEM). The use of the SEM in the second step of the analysis allows for a significant reduction in computational costs as compared to a FE analysis. This methodology is first verified by means of a full FE analysis for a single stretched cable. Next, simulations are made to study the effects of damage in a single stretched cable and a cable-supported truss. The results of the simulations show how damage significantly affects the high frequency response, confirming the potential of wave propagation based methods for SHM.

[1]  Robert W. Clayton,et al.  A finite-difference simulation of wave propagation in two-dimensional random media , 1984 .

[2]  K. Spak,et al.  Parameters for Modeling Stranded Cables as Structural Beams , 2014 .

[3]  Michele Meo,et al.  A new damage detection technique based on wave propagation for rails , 2006 .

[4]  C. Rubio-Gonzalez,et al.  Finite-element simulation of wave propagation and dispersion in Hopkinson bar test , 2006 .

[5]  Usik Lee,et al.  Spectral analysis for the transverse vibration of an axially moving Timoshenko beam , 2004 .

[6]  H. Tabatabai,et al.  UNIFIED FINITE DIFFERENCE FORMULATION FOR FREE VIBRATION OF CABLES , 1998 .

[7]  Armin B. Mehrabi,et al.  In-Service Evaluation of Cable-Stayed Bridges, Overview of Available Methods, and Findings , 2006 .

[8]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Accurate cable force determination using ambient vibration measurements , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  On damping mechanisms in beams , 1991 .

[10]  James F. Doyle,et al.  Wave Propagation in Structures: Spectral Analysis Using Fast Discrete Fourier Transforms , 1997 .

[11]  Piervincenzo Rizzo,et al.  Feature Extraction for Defect Detection in Strands by Guided Ultrasonic Waves , 2006 .

[12]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Identification of axial forces in beam members by local vibration measurements , 2013 .

[13]  Christoph Schaal,et al.  Energy-based models for guided ultrasonic wave propagation in multi-wire cables , 2015 .

[14]  Juan A. Quintana,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION ON A CABLE STAYED BRIDGE USING WAVE PROPAGATION ANALYSIS , 2014 .

[15]  Christoph Schaal,et al.  Damage detection in multi-wire cables using guided ultrasonic waves , 2016 .

[16]  Stephen P. Timoshenko,et al.  Vibration problems in engineering , 1928 .

[17]  Geert Lombaert,et al.  Uncertainty quantification in the damage assessment of a cable-stayed bridge by means of fuzzy numbers , 2009 .

[18]  D. Wilcox.  Numerical Laplace Transformation and Inversion , 1978 .

[19]  Mattias Schevenels,et al.  EDT: An ElastoDynamics Toolbox for MATLAB , 2008, Comput. Geosci..

[20]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  Wave propagation analysis of frame structures using the spectral element method , 2004 .

[21]  N. Perkins,et al.  FREELY PROPAGATING WAVES IN ELASTIC CABLES , 1996 .