Small worlds evolving: governance reforms, privatizations, and ownership networks in Italy

How do ownership networks among business enterprises evolve over time? What roles do corporate governance reforms and privatization programs play in shaping the structural characteristics of these networks? This article addresses these questions by leveraging on small-world analysis techniques applied to the ownership networks among Italian enterprises in 1990 and 2000. Italy underwent a significant program of privatizations over the decade under study, coupled with changes in the corporate law aimed at strengthening the defense of minority shareholders. The data show signs of significant fragmentation of the overall network, but at the same time of stability in the structure of its main component, as measured by small-world coefficients. Further, the role of the key players in the network seems to remain relatively stable despite the major turbulence at the institutional level as well as in the structural characteristics of the complete network. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Richard Whitley,et al.  Corporate Networks in Europe and the United States , 2003 .

[3]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[4]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Mark Newman,et al.  Models of the Small World , 2000 .

[6]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Entrepreneurship and Privatization in Central Europe: The Tenuous Balance Between Destruction and Creation , 2000 .

[7]  Xavier Vives,et al.  Corporate Governance: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives , 2000 .

[8]  D. Watts.  Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[10]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Law and Finance , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[11]  F. Brioschi,et al.  Le grandi imprese private. Famiglie e coalizioni , 1997 .

[12]  F. Barca.  Imprese in cerca di padrone : proprietà e controllo nel capitalismo italiano , 1994 .

[13]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[14]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  Random Graphs , 1985 .

[15]  F. Stokman,et al.  Networks Of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis Of Ten Countries , 1985 .

[16]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The American Corporate Network 1904-1974 , 1982 .

[17]  Y. Amihud,et al.  Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers , 1981 .

[18]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[19]  R. Breiger.  The Duality of Persons and Groups , 1974 .

[20]  Sharon L. Milgram,et al.  The Small World Problem , 1967 .

[21]  A. Gerschenkron,et al.  Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. A Book of Essays , 1963 .