Characterisation of bronchoconstrictor responses to sodium metabisulphite aerosol in atopic subjects with and without asthma.

Inhalation of sodium metabisulphite is thought to induce bronchoconstriction by release of sulphur dioxide. We sought to establish the reproducibility of the airway response to inhaled sodium metabisulphite given in increasing doubling concentrations (0.3 to 160 mg/ml) to 13 asthmatic and five atopic non-asthmatic subjects and the contribution of cholinergic mechanisms to this response. In 15 of the 18 subjects bronchoconstriction was sufficient to allow calculation of the dose of metabisulphite causing a 20% reduction in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline values (PD20 metabisulphite). The 95% confidence limit for the difference between this and a second PD20 metabisulphite determined 2-14 days later was 2.5 doubling doses. The difference between repeat PD20 metabisulphite measurements was unrelated to the number of days between challenges or change in baseline FEV1. Ten subjects returned for a third study 3-120 days after the second challenge; variability in PD20 metabisulphite did not differ from that seen between the first and second challenges. PD20 methacholine was determined between the two metabisulphite challenges and found to correlate with PD20 metabisulphite (r = 0.71). Inhaled ipratropium bromide 200 micrograms given in a randomised, placebo controlled, crossover study to 10 subjects increased PD20 methacholine 42 fold but had no significant effect on the response to metabisulphite. A single inhalation of the PD20 metabisulphite in five subjects induced maximal bronchoconstriction 2-3 minutes after inhalation, with a plateau in FEV1 lasting a further four minutes before recovery. A further single inhalation of the same PD20 dose 43 minutes later produced a 27% (SEM 4%) smaller fall in FEV1 than the first inhalation. These results show that metabisulphite PD20 values measured over days and weeks show similar reproducibility to those reported for histamine inhalation and that PD20 metabisulphite correlates with methacholine responsiveness. Most of the bronchoconstriction is not inhibited by antimuscarinic agents; the underlying mechanisms require further investigation.

[1]  P. Barnes,et al.  Bradykinin-induced bronchoconstriction: inhibition by nedocromil sodium and sodium cromoglycate. , 1989, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  W. Pierson,et al.  Therapeutic range cromolyn dose-response inhibition and complete obliteration of SO2-induced bronchoconstriction in atopic adolescents. , 1988, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[3]  T. Gordon,et al.  The roles of pH and ionic species in sulfur dioxide- and sulfite-induced bronchoconstriction. , 1987, The American review of respiratory disease.

[4]  L. Frølund,et al.  Reproducibility of challenge tests at different times. , 1987, Chest.

[5]  P. Barnes,et al.  Effect of nedocromil sodium on sulphur dioxide induced bronchoconstriction. , 1987, Thorax.

[6]  P. Barnes Neural control of human airways in health and disease. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[7]  H. Boushey,et al.  Interaction of cromolyn and a muscarinic antagonist in inhibiting bronchial reactivity to sulfur dioxide and to eucapnic hyperpnea alone. , 1986, The American review of respiratory disease.

[8]  N. Holstein-Rathlou,et al.  Bronchial Histamine Challenge , 1985, Allergy.

[9]  L. Frølund,et al.  Short and long term reproducibility of responsiveness to inhaled histamine: Rt compared to FEV1 as measurement of response to challenge. , 1985, European journal of respiratory diseases.

[10]  K. Chung,et al.  Effect of prior bronchoconstriction on the airway response to histamine in normal subjects. , 1984, Thorax.

[11]  H. Boushey,et al.  Tolerance to sulfur dioxide-induced bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma. , 1983, Environmental research.

[12]  N. Douglas,et al.  Protective effect of drugs on bronchoconstriction induced by sulphur dioxide. , 1982, Thorax.

[13]  P. Snashall,et al.  Mechanisms of sulphur dioxide induced bronchoconstriction in normal and asthmatic man. , 1982, Thorax.

[14]  A. Steinacker Presynaptic effects of sodium bisulfite at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1982, Journal of Neuroscience Research.

[15]  D. Allen,et al.  Bronchospasm induced by metabisulphite‐containing foods and drugs , 1981, The Medical journal of Australia.

[16]  R. Simon,et al.  Sensitivity to ingested metabisulfites in asthmatic subjects. , 1981, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[17]  Harries Mg Bronchial irritant receptors and a possible new action for cromolyn sodium. , 1981 .

[18]  M. Harries Bronchial irritant receptors and a possible new action for cromolyn sodium. , 1981, Annals of allergy.

[19]  H. Boushey,et al.  Lower threshold and greater bronchomotor responsiveness of asthmatic subjects to sulfur dioxide. , 2015, The American review of respiratory disease.

[20]  M. Dixon,et al.  THE ACTION OF SODIUM CROMOGLYCATE ON ‘C’ FIBRE ENDINGS IN THE DOG LUNG , 1980, British journal of pharmacology.

[21]  A. Steinacker Sulphonation of cholinergic receptor disulphide bond increases response to ACh , 1979, Nature.

[22]  D. Cockcroft,et al.  Allergen‐induced increase in non‐allergic bronchial reactivity , 1977, Clinical allergy.

[23]  J. Nadel,et al.  Mechanisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in normal subjects after upper respiratory tract infection. , 1976, The American review of respiratory disease.

[24]  J. Nadel,et al.  MECHANISM OF BRONCHOCONSTRICTION DURING INHALATION OF SULFUR DIOXIDE. , 1965, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  F. Immer,et al.  STATISTICS FOR SOCIAL SCIENTISTS , 1935 .