Anaerobic co-digestion of source segregated brown water (feces-without-urine) and food waste: for Singapore context.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of anaerobic co-digestion of brown water (BW) [feces-without-urine] and food waste (FW) in decentralized, source-separation-based sanitation concept. An effort has been made to separate the yellow water (urine) and brown water from the source (using no-mix toilet) primarily to facilitate further treatment, resource recovery and utilization. Batch assay analytical results indicated that anaerobic co-digestion [BW+FW] showed higher methane yield (0.54-0.59 L CH(4)/gVS(added)) than BW or FW as a sole substrate. Anaerobic co-digestion was performed in the semi-continuously fed laboratory scale reactors viz. two-phase continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR) and single-stage sequencing-batch operational mode reactor (SeqBR). Initial 120 d of operation shows that SeqBR performed better in terms of organic matter removal and maximum methane production. At steady-state, CODs, CODt, VS removals of 92.0±3.0, 76.7±5.1 and 75.7±6.6% were achieved for SeqBR at 16d HRT, respectively. This corresponds to an OLR of 2-3 gCOD/L d and methane yield of about 0.41 L CH(4)/gVS(added). Good buffering capacity did not lead to accumulation of VFA, showing better process stability of SeqBR at higher loading rates. The positive findings show the great potential of applying anaerobic co-digestion of BW+FW for energy production and waste management. In addition, daily flush water consumption is reduced up to 80%. Decentralized, source-separation-based sanitation concept is expected to provide a practical solution for those countries experiencing rapid urbanization and water shortage issues, for instance Singapore.

[1]  T Elmitwalli,et al.  Enhanced primary treatment of concentrated black water and kitchen residues within DESAR concept using two types of anaerobic digesters. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  T. Stenström,et al.  Degradation of faecal sterols in urine for assessment of faecal cross-contamination in source-separated human urine and urine storage tank sediment , 1999 .

[3]  K. Schleifer,et al.  The domain-specific probe EUB338 is insufficient for the detection of all Bacteria: development and evaluation of a more comprehensive probe set. , 1999, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[4]  J. Votruba,et al.  The mass—Energy balance of anaerobic methane production , 1983, Folia Microbiologica.

[5]  Christian Remy,et al.  Life cycle assessment of conventional and source separation systems for urban wastewater management , 2010 .

[6]  F. Béline,et al.  Anaerobic hydrolysis and acidification of organic substrates: determination of anaerobic hydrolytic potential. , 2011, Bioresource Technology.

[7]  Martin Oldenburg,et al.  Operation experiences with a source-separating project* , 2003 .

[8]  Stephen H. Zinder,et al.  Physiological Ecology of Methanogens , 1993 .

[9]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. , 1995, Microbiological reviews.

[10]  N. Aoki,et al.  Development of High-Performance Thermophilic Two-Phase Digestion Process , 1991 .

[11]  G Zeeman,et al.  Performance of UASB septic tank for treatment of concentrated black water within DESAR concept. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  S. Ledakowicz,et al.  Anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and organic fraction of municipal solid wastes , 2003 .

[13]  T. Wolever,et al.  Fecal acetate is inversely related to acetate absorption from the human rectum and distal colon. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[14]  M. Payton,et al.  Human Nutrition and Metabolism Research Communication , 2001 .

[15]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[16]  Hyun-Woo Kim,et al.  Response Surface Optimization of Substrates for Thermophilic Anaerobic Codigestion of Sewage Sludge and Food Waste , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  Marian Chertow,et al.  An island approach to industrial ecology: towards sustainability in the island context , 2004 .

[18]  Fenglin Liu,et al.  Effects of mixture ratio on anaerobic co-digestion with fruit and vegetable waste and food waste of China. , 2011, Journal of environmental sciences.

[19]  R Otterpohl,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of blackwater from vacuum toilets and kitchen refuse in a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR). , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  Richard E. Speece,et al.  Anaerobic Biotechnology for Industrial Wastewaters , 1996 .

[21]  P. He,et al.  Methanosarcina as the dominant aceticlastic methanogens during mesophilic anaerobic digestion of putrescible waste , 2008, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[22]  Claudia Gallert,et al.  Co-digestion of press water and food waste in a biowaste digester for improvement of biogas production. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[23]  T Elmitwalli,et al.  Co-digestion of concentrated black water and kitchen refuse in an accumulation system within the DESAR (decentralized sanitation and reuse) concept. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  G Zeeman,et al.  Anaerobic biodegradability and digestion in accumulation systems for concentrated black water and kitchen organic-wastes. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.