Pulsatile motion effects on 3D magnetic resonance angiography: Implications for evaluating carotid artery stenoses

In‐plane carotid artery motion during a 3D MR angiography (MRA) scan can significantly degrade the resulting image resolution. This study characterizes the effect of cardiac pulsatility on 3D contrast‐enhanced (CE) MRA with elliptical centric acquisitions using a point‐spread function (PSF) analysis. Internal carotid artery (ICA) motion was collected from volunteers and patients using both MR and ultrasound (US) scans. After measuring the carotid artery motion displacement, a simulation was performed which calculated the blurring effects for three different protocols: nongated and two different cardiac gating schemes. The motion sensitivity of each protocol was evaluated for different spatial resolutions. The selection of optimal imaging parameters for a given scan time was investigated. The final results showed that cardiac‐gated acquisitions only over a limited region of k‐space high spatial frequencies are more time‐efficient than cardiac gating for the entire k‐space, as it allows for higher resolutions to be achieved and for capturing the arterial phase with low spatial frequencies. Selecting the optimal gating parameters depends directly on the motion characteristics of each individual. Our initial clinical experience is presented, and the need for a real‐time tool that characterizes motion behavior for each individual as a prescan protocol is discussed. Magn Reson Med 52:605–611, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  D Saloner,et al.  MRA studies of arterial stenosis: Improvements by diastolic acquisition , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  G. Wright,et al.  Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography--initial assessment. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  Graham A. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the correlation coefficient template matching algorithm with application to real-time 2-D coronary artery MR imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  C J Hardy,et al.  Real‐time interactive MRI on a conventional scanner , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Graham A Wright,et al.  Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[6]  G. Wright,et al.  Spinal dural arteriovenous fistula localization with a technique of first-pass gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: initial experience. , 2002, Radiology.

[7]  S J Riederer,et al.  Performance of an elliptical centric view order for signal enhancement and motion artifact suppression in breath‐hold three‐dimensional gradient echo imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[9]  J K Kim,et al.  Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[10]  R F Busse,et al.  Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. , 1999, Radiology.