Theory of Neuronal Perturbome: Linking Connectivity to Coding via Perturbations

To unravel the functional properties of the brain, we need to untangle how neurons interact with each other and coordinate in large-scale recurrent networks. One way to address this question is to measure the functional influence of individual neurons on each other by perturbing them in vivo. Application of such single-neuron perturbations in mouse visual cortex has recently revealed feature-specific suppression between excitatory neurons, despite the presence of highly specific excitatory connectivity, which was deemed to underlie feature-specific amplification. Here, we studied which connectivity profiles are consistent with these seemingly contradictory observations, by modelling the effect of single-neuron perturbations in large-scale neuronal networks. Our numerical simulations and mathematical analysis revealed that, contrary to the prima facie assumption, neither inhibition-dominance nor broad inhibition alone were sufficient to explain the experimental findings; instead, strong and functionally specific excitatory-inhibitory connectivity was necessary, consistent with recent findings in the primary visual cortex of rodents. Such networks had a higher capacity to encode and decode natural images in turn, which was accompanied by the emergence of response gain nonlinearities at the population level. Our study provides a general computational framework to investigate how single-neuron perturbations are linked to cortical connectivity and sensory coding, and paves the road to map the perturbome of neuronal networks in future studies.

[1]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  Visual Representations by Cortical Somatostatin Inhibitory Neurons—Selective But with Weak and Delayed Responses , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Sur,et al.  Response Selectivity Is Correlated to Dendritic Structure in Parvalbumin-Expressing Inhibitory Neurons in Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Márton Rózsa,et al.  Human pyramidal to interneuron synapses are mediated by multi-vesicular release and multiple docked vesicles , 2016, eLife.

[4]  Lief E. Fenno,et al.  The development and application of optogenetics. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[5]  E. Boyden Optogenetics and the future of neuroscience , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Targeted photostimulation uncovers circuit motifs supporting short-term memory , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  D. R. Muir,et al.  Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex , 2015, Nature.

[8]  M. Sahani,et al.  Distinct learning-induced changes in stimulus selectivity and interactions of GABAergic interneuron classes in visual cortex , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Hongkui Zeng,et al.  Differential tuning and population dynamics of excitatory and inhibitory neurons reflect differences in local intracortical connectivity , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  Linear Transformation of Thalamocortical input by Intracortical Excitation , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Petr Znamenskiy,et al.  Functional selectivity and specific connectivity of inhibitory neurons in primary visual cortex , 2018, bioRxiv.

[12]  Arthur W. Wetzel,et al.  Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons , 2011, Nature.

[13]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  GABAergic Neurons in Ferret Visual Cortex Participate in Functionally Specific Networks , 2017, Neuron.

[14]  M. Scanziani,et al.  Tuned Thalamic Excitation is Amplified by Visual Cortical Circuits , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  A blanket of inhibition: functional inferences from dense inhibitory connectivity , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  Brett J. Graham,et al.  Anatomy and function of an excitatory network in the visual cortex , 2016, Nature.

[17]  G. Tamás,et al.  Plasticity in Single Axon Glutamatergic Connection to GABAergic Interneurons Regulates Complex Events in the Human Neocortex , 2016, PLoS biology.

[18]  Jörg Menche,et al.  Mapping the perturbome network of cellular perturbations , 2019, Nature Communications.

[19]  R. Yuste,et al.  Dense, Unspecific Connectivity of Neocortical Parvalbumin-Positive Interneurons: A Canonical Microcircuit for Inhibition? , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Thomas Knöpfel,et al.  Optical voltage imaging in neurons: moving from technology development to practical tool , 2019, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  P. J. Sjöström,et al.  Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks , 2011, Nature.

[22]  Csaba Varga,et al.  Complex Events Initiated by Individual Spikes in the Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[23]  Peter E. Latham,et al.  Excitatory and Inhibitory Subnetworks Are Equally Selective during Decision-Making and Emerge Simultaneously during Learning , 2018, Neuron.

[24]  Kenichi Ohki,et al.  Natural images are reliably represented by sparse and variable populations of neurons in visual cortex , 2020, Nature Communications.

[25]  Selmaan N. Chettih,et al.  Single-neuron perturbations reveal feature-specific competition in V1 , 2019, Nature.

[26]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetics in Neural Systems , 2011, Neuron.

[27]  R. Yuste,et al.  Dense Inhibitory Connectivity in Neocortex , 2011, Neuron.

[28]  C. Clopath,et al.  The emergence of functional microcircuits in visual cortex , 2013, Nature.

[29]  Violeta G. Lopez-Huerta,et al.  Population imaging of neural activity in awake behaving mice , 2019, Nature.

[30]  Stefan Rotter,et al.  How Structure Determines Correlations in Neuronal Networks , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  A. Wanner,et al.  Whitening of odor representations by the wiring diagram of the olfactory bulb , 2019, Nature Neuroscience.