International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview

The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the academic research on International Entrepreneurship (IE). To accomplish this, an exhaustive bibliometric analysis was carried out, involving a bibliometric performance analysis and a graphic mapping of the references in this field. Our analysis focuses on journals, papers, authors, institutions and countries. To perform the performance analysis, the work uses a series of bibliometric indicators such as h-index, productivity and citations. Furthermore, the VOS viewer to graphically map the bibliographic material is used. The graphical analysis uses co-citation, bibliographic coupling and co-occurrence of keywords. The results of both analyzes are consistent among them, and show that the USA is the most influential country in IE research as it houses the main authors and institutions in this research field. Moreover, is observed and expected the continued growth of the field globally. Our research plays an informative and complementary role as it presents most of the key aspects in International Entrepreneurship research.

[1]  E. Wang Determinants of R&D investment: The Extreme-Bounds-Analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries , 2010 .

[2]  Ram Gopal Raj,et al.  Relative measure index: a metric to measure the quality of journals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[3]  P. McDougall–Covin,et al.  High–Potential Concepts, Phenomena, and Theories for the Advancement of International Entrepreneurship Research * , 2014 .

[4]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  On the Frontiers: The Implications of Social Entrepreneurship for International Entrepreneurship , 2013 .

[5]  José M. Merigó,et al.  An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[6]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[7]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar , 2007 .

[8]  Chris Rensleigh,et al.  Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison , 2013, Electron. Libr..

[9]  Jean-Pierre Boissin,et al.  Is Entrepreneurial Internationalization a field? A bibliometric analysis (1989-2015) , 2016 .

[10]  José M. Merigó,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science , 2017 .

[11]  Hsi-Peng Lu,et al.  Trends in and contributions to entrepreneurship research: a broad review of literature from 1996 to June 2012 , 2013, Scientometrics.

[12]  Christian A. Cancino,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research , 2017 .

[13]  S. Kraus,et al.  Mapping the field of family business research: past trends and future directions , 2015 .

[14]  Brian R. Chabowski,et al.  Cross-national research and international business: An interdisciplinary path , 2017 .

[15]  Samuel Bjork,et al.  Time series citation data: the Nobel Prize in economics , 2013, Scientometrics.

[16]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis , 2005, Scientometrics.

[17]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  25years at Knowledge-Based Systems , 2015 .

[19]  Andrea Rey-Martí,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[20]  M. M. Kessler Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .

[21]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base , 2012, posted content for vor conflict notifications.

[23]  B. Becker Public R&D Policies and Private R&D Investment: A Survey of the Empirical Evidence , 2015 .

[24]  Péter Jacsó,et al.  The pros and cons of computing the h-index using Web of Science , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[25]  Anne-Wil Harzing,et al.  Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison , 2015, Scientometrics.

[26]  Colin Campbell-Hunt,et al.  A Strategic Approach to Internationalization: A Traditional versus a “Born-Global” Approach , 2004 .

[27]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[28]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Assessing the impact of JIBS as an interdisciplinary journal: A network approach , 2014 .

[29]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  The Past and the Future of International Entrepreneurship: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field , 2009 .

[30]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  International Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): A domain ontology and thematic analysis , 2011 .

[31]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  The emergence, advance and future of international entrepreneurship research — An introduction to the special forum , 2011 .

[32]  James A. Wise The ecological approach to text visualization , 1999 .

[33]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[34]  Elizabeth S. Vieira,et al.  A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university , 2009, Scientometrics.

[35]  O. Persson,et al.  How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis , 2009 .

[36]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths , 2000 .

[37]  E. Autio Creative tension: the significance of Ben Oviatt's and Patricia McDougall's article ‘toward a theory of international new ventures’ , 2005 .

[38]  Dejian Yu,et al.  Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: Using a citation network analysis , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[39]  Elena García Barriocanal,et al.  Comparing impact factors from two different citation databases: The case of Computer Science , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[40]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[41]  M. Fetscherin,et al.  30 Years of foreign direct investment to China: An interdisciplinary literature review , 2010 .

[42]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[43]  D. Audretsch Shaker A. Zahra: pioneering entrepreneurship scholar , 2015 .

[44]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Combining Mapping and Citation Analysis for Evaluative Bibliometric Purposes: A Bibliometric Study , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[45]  M. Ferreira,et al.  Mergers & acquisitions research: A bibliometric study of top strategy and international business journals, 1980–2010 , 2014 .

[46]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International versus domestic entrepreneurship: New venture strategic behavior and industry structure , 1989 .

[47]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[48]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences' literature , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[49]  J. Merigó,et al.  A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research , 2016 .

[50]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[51]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Academic research in innovation: a country analysis , 2016, Scientometrics.

[52]  Fernando Ferreira,et al.  What do we [not] know about technology entrepreneurship research? , 2015, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal.

[53]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Journal of Informetrics , 2022 .

[54]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Web site design with the patron in mind: A step-by-step guide for libraries , 2006 .

[55]  M. Callon,et al.  From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .

[56]  José Ernesto Amorós,et al.  GEM research: achievements and challenges , 2014 .

[57]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Defining International Entrepreneurship and Modeling the Speed of Internationalization , 2005 .

[58]  Fabio Blanco-Mesa,et al.  International entrepreneurship: a critical review of the research field , 2019, European J. of International Management.

[59]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Scholarly Influence in the Field of Management: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Determinants of University and Author Impact in the Management Literature in the Past Quarter Century , 2008 .

[60]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  H-Classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index , 2014, Scientometrics.

[61]  S. Shane,et al.  Explaining the Formation of International New Ventures: The Limits of Theories from International Business Research , 1994 .