Quality assurance of the EORTC 26981/22981; NCIC CE3 intergroup trial on radiotherapy with or without temozolomide for newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: the individual case review.

The phase III randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trail Group (NCIC) Intergroup trial (EORTC 26981/22981; CE3) compares irradiation alone with irradiation plus temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We evaluated the compliance to radiotherapy (RT) guidelines. All 85 recruiting centres were invited to participate in the individual case review. Fifty-four centres (64%) entering 71% of the patients provided data on one randomly selected patient. All participating centres used individual head immobilisation and computerised tomography (CT)-based treatment planning. Most (74%) performed three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-D-CRT) including dose-volume histograms. Ninety-four percent performed portal imaging at least once. Planning target volume (PTV) and structures at risk were delineated in most of the centres (94%). Although the PTV received < 95% of the prescription dose (60 Gy in 2 Gy/fraction/day) in 39% of the centres; all except 2 centres delivered 50-60 Gy to the PTV. The maximum dose to the critical structures exceeded the protocol dose constraints in 39% of the reviewed patients, but in only 9% was this over the acceptable tolerance dose reported in the literature. We found a high rate of compliance with the protocol and general RT guidelines in the centres participating in this individual case review. In multicentre trials with a large of number of investigators from international and national groups, it is essential to confirm the interinstitutional consistency, qualitatively and quantitatively.

[1]  R. Stupp,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group. Review Temozolomide for Brain Tumours Current and Future Developments in the Use of Temozolomide for the Treatment of Brain Tumours , 2022 .

[2]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Fred H. Hochberg,et al.  Assumptions in the radiotherapy of glioblastoma , 1980, Neurology.

[4]  R. McLendon,et al.  DNA mismatch repair and O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase analysis and response to Temodal in newly diagnosed malignant glioma. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  N. Laperriere,et al.  Radiotherapy for newly diagnosed malignant glioma in adults: a systematic review. , 2002, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  E. Newlands,et al.  In vitro evaluation of temozolomide combined with X-irradiation , 1997, Anti-cancer drugs.

[7]  J. Horiot,et al.  The Quality Assurance programme of the Radiotherapy Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC): a critical appraisal of 20 years of continuous efforts. , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[8]  C. Kennard,et al.  Temozolomide: a new oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent with promising activity against primary brain tumours. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[9]  E. Newlands,et al.  Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045: M&B 39831: NSC 362856). , 1992, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  S B Green,et al.  Randomized trial of three chemotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens and two radiotherapy regimens in postoperative treatment of malignant glioma. Brain Tumor Cooperative Group Trial 8001. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  R. Tanaka,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology of cerebral gliomas , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[12]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Radiation response of the central nervous system. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  R. Hatlevoll,et al.  Combined modality therapy of operated astrocytomas grade III and IV. Confirmation of the value of postoperative irradiation and lack of potentiation of bleomycin on survival time: A prospective multicenter trial of the scandinavian glioblastoma study group , 1981, Cancer.

[14]  K Okajima,et al.  Differences in target outline delineation from CT scans of brain tumours using different methods and different observers. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  N. Bleehen,et al.  A Medical Research Council trial of two radiotherapy doses in the treatment of grades 3 and 4 astrocytoma. The Medical Research Council Brain Tumour Working Party. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  A. Garden,et al.  Radiation-induced injury to the visual pathway. , 1994, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[17]  K. Wallner,et al.  Patterns of failure following treatment for glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  J. Bernier,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy: from radiation physics to patient- and trial-oriented control procedures. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[19]  D P Byar,et al.  Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. Roddie,et al.  Phase I trial of temozolomide using an extended continuous oral schedule. , 1998, Cancer research.

[21]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .