Social harms in an algorithmic context

[1]  M. Wood,et al.  Analysing the multiple dimensions of predictive policing’s techno-social harms , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[2]  M. Viljanen.  Technology matters: how algorithm and artificial intelligent technology features affect harms reduction efforts , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[3]  Pamela Ugwudike,et al.  Harms of digital capital: social harm analysis of online public resistance and information pollution , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[4]  Carlo Gatti.  Monitoring the monitors: a demystifying gaze at algorithmic prophecies in policing , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[5]  Nea Lepinkäinen,et al.  Between algorithmic and analogue harms: the case of automation in Finnish Immigration Services , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[6]  Terhi Esko,et al.  Rethinking research on social harms in an algorithmic context , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[7]  Jesús-C. Aguerri,et al.  The algorithmic responses to disinformation: a suitable pathway? , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[8]  Pamela Ugwudike,et al.  Managing risks, passing over harms? A commentary on the proposed EU AI Regulation in the context of criminal justice , 2022, Justice, Power and Resistance.

[9]  J. Symons,et al.  Epistemic injustice and data science technologies , 2022, Synthese.

[10]  M. Wood,et al.  Beyond Cybercrime: New Perspectives on Crime, Harm and Digital Technologies , 2022, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy.

[11]  E. Moss,et al.  Resistance and refusal to algorithmic harms: Varieties of ‘knowledge projects’ , 2022, Media International Australia.

[12]  M. Viljanen,et al.  Dynamics of Social Harms in an Algorithmic Context , 2022, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy.

[13]  S. Tombs,et al.  From Social Harm to Zemiology , 2021 .

[14]  Simo Hosio,et al.  A Systematic Assessment of National Artificial Intelligence Policies: Perspectives from the Nordics and Beyond , 2020, NordiCHI.

[15]  Marja Alastalo,et al.  Software-Sorted Exclusion of Asylum Seekers in Norway and Finland , 2020, Global Perspectives.

[16]  F. Soliman.  States of exception, human rights, and social harm: Towards a border zemiology , 2019 .

[17]  S. Scott.  Protecting Workers from Exploitation in Neoliberal States: A Social Harm Perspective , 2019 .

[18]  A. Powell,et al.  Digital Criminology , 2018 .

[19]  John M. Cinnamon,et al.  Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism , 2017 .

[20]  Mariarosaria Taddeo,et al.  The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[21]  H. Rosa,et al.  Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity , 2013 .

[22]  M. Yar.  Critical criminology, critical theory and social harm , 2012 .

[23]  Anne Alvesalo.  Economic Crime Investigators at Work , 2003 .

[24]  Uwe Götze,et al.  Editorial , 1976, The China Journal.

[25]  S. Tombs,et al.  Beyond Criminology? , 2021, The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm.

[26]  USING ELSEVIER’S FIELD WEIGHTED CITATION INDEX SCORE FOR REDUNDANCY SELECTION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL , 2021 .

[27]  L. Andrews.  Algorithms, Regulation, and Governance Readiness , 2019, Algorithmic Regulation.

[28]  L. Paoli,et al.  Harm: a Neglected Concept in Criminology, a Necessary Benchmark for Crime-Control Policy , 2013 .