Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE To investigate factors related to the wheelchair, impairment, and environment that affect perception of participation of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in activities performed in 3 settings: in the home, in the community, and during transportation. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. SETTING Research centers and a specialized assistive technology (AT) clinic in Pittsburgh (Pitt). Research centers and community-based rehabilitation technology suppliers in Saint Louis (SL). PARTICIPANTS Seventy wheelchair users with SCI. INTERVENTIONS Subjects from Pitt and SL completed a written survey of AT usage in daily activities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Subjects were asked 5 questions within each setting (home, community, transportation) related to their perceived reason for functional limitations. RESULTS The wheelchair was the most commonly cited factor limiting participation, followed by physical impairment and physical environment. Twenty-one percent of subjects with paraplegia reported pain as a limiting factor for their transportation use, significantly more (P=.047) than subjects with tetraplegia (3%). A trend (P=.099) was seen toward a higher percentage of subjects with tetraplegia (tetraplegia, 7%; paraplegia, 3%) reporting lack of equipment as a limiting factor for use of transportation. Differences were also seen across sites. CONCLUSIONS The wheelchair was the most commonly cited limiting factor, followed by physical impairment and physical environment. The wheelchair is the most important mobility device used by persons with SCI and the one that users most associate with barriers.

[1]  Hugh Stewart,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to abandon manual wheelchairs for three individuals with a spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[2]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Wheelchair Users Are Not Necessarily Wheelchair Bound , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[3]  G. Chard International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , 2004 .

[4]  M J Scherer,et al.  Measuring subjective quality of life following spinal cord injury: a validation study of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  M. Devivo,et al.  Predictors of life satisfaction: a spinal cord injury cohort study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  G. T. Wannamaker,et al.  Spinal cord injuries; a review of the early treatment in 300 consecutive cases during the Korean Conflict. , 1954, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  C. Harrison,et al.  Community reintegration of SCI persons: problems and perceptions. , 1989, SCI nursing : a publication of the American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses.

[8]  M. Batavia,et al.  Changing chairs: anticipating problems in prescribing wheelchairs. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  William C. Mann,et al.  Problems with wheelchairs experienced by frail elders , 1996 .

[10]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[11]  Luc Noreau,et al.  Long-term consequences of spinal cord injury on social participation: the occurrence of handicap situations , 2000, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  Yves Lepage,et al.  Health-related quality of life after spinal cord injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  L. Vogel,et al.  Community integration among adults with spinal cord injuries sustained as children or adolescents. , 2003, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[14]  M Dijkers,et al.  Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  A. Schrijvers,et al.  Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[16]  R O Smith,et al.  Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. , 1996, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[17]  The impact of assistive technology and environmental interventions on function and living situation status with people who are ageing with developmental disabilities , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  L. M. Puckett Barriers to access , 2005 .

[19]  B. Dudgeon,et al.  Educational participation of children with spinal cord injury. , 1997, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[20]  W. Donovan,et al.  PROFILE OF DENIALS OF DURABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT FOR SCI PATIENTS BY THIRD PARTY PAYERS , 1987, American journal of physical medicine.

[21]  R. Trieschmann Spinal cord injuries : psychological, social and vocational rehabilitation , 1988 .

[22]  P J Nichols,et al.  Wheelchair user's shoulder? Shoulder pain in patients with spinal cord lesions. , 1979, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[23]  L L Pierce,et al.  Barriers to access: frustrations of people who use a wheelchair for full-time mobility. , 1998, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[24]  W. Waring,et al.  Compressive mononeuropathies of the upper extremity in chronic paraplegia , 1991, Paraplegia.

[25]  R. Cooper Wheelchair Users Are Not Necessarily Wheelchair Bound , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.