The challenge of maximizing safety in radiation oncology.

There is a growing interest in the evolving nature of safety challenges in radiation oncology. Understandably, there has been a great deal of focus on the mechanical and computer aspects of new high-technology treatments (eg, intensity-modulated radiation therapy). However, safety concerns are not limited to dose calculations and data transfer associated with advanced technologies. They also stem from fundamental changes in our workflow (eg, multiple hand-offs), the relative loss of some traditional "end of the line" quality assurance tools (port films and light fields), condensed fractionation schedules, and an under-appreciation for the physical limitations of new techniques. Furthermore, changes in our workspace and tools (eg, electronic records, planning systems), and workloads (eg, billing, insurance, regulations) may have unforeseen effects on safety. Safety initiatives need to acknowledge the multiple factors affecting risk. Our current challenges will not be adequately addressed simply by defining new policies and procedures. Rather, we need to understand the frequency and causes of errors better, particularly those that are most likely to cause harm. Then we can incorporate principles into our workspace that minimize these risks (eg, automation, standardization, checklists, redundancy, and consideration of "human factors" in the design of products and workspaces). Opportunities to enhance safety involve providing support through diligent examinations of staffing, schedules, communications, teamwork, and work environments. We need to develop a culture of safety in which all team members are alerted to the possibility of harm, and they all work together to maximize safety. The goal is not to eliminate every error. Rather, we should focus our attention on conditions (eg, rushing) that can cause real patient harm, and/or those conditions that reflect systemic problems that might lead to errors more likely to cause harm. Ongoing changes in clinical practice mandate continued vigilance to minimize the risks of error, combined with new, nontraditional approaches to create a safer patient environment.

[1]  J. Williamson,et al.  Foreword. Symposium " Quality Assurance of Radiation Therapy: The Challenges of Advanced Technologies". , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Douglas A Wiegmann,et al.  Application of the human factors analysis and classification system methodology to the cardiovascular surgery operating room. , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  B. Curran,et al.  Integrating the healthcare enterprise in radiation oncology plug and play--the future of radiation oncology? , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  B. Sexton,et al.  Revealing and resolving patient safety defects: the impact of leadership WalkRounds on frontline caregiver assessments of patient safety. , 2008, Health services research.

[5]  3-D beams need 3-D names. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J W Goldwein,et al.  Radiotherapeutic errors and computerized record/verify systems. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  C. H. Clement,et al.  Preventing Accidental Exposures from New External Beam Radiation Therapy Technologies , 2009 .

[8]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. , 2009, Medical physics.

[9]  NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN RADIATION THERAPY: ENSURING PATIENT SAFETY, RADIATION SAFETY AND REGULATORY ISSUES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY , 2008, Health physics.

[10]  R. Macklis,et al.  Error rates in clinical radiotherapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Philip S. Bagwell,et al.  End of the Line , 1984 .

[12]  Ben-Tzion Karsh,et al.  Human factors and systems engineering approach to patient safety for radiotherapy. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Statistical process control for radiotherapy quality assurance. , 2005, Medical physics.

[14]  W. Dewé,et al.  Evaluation of frequency and type of errors detected by a computerized record and verify system during radiation treatment. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  T. K. Yeung,et al.  Quality assurance in radiotherapy: evaluation of errors and incidents recorded over a 10 year period. , 2005, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Variation and control of process behavior. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  S. E. Feldman The Patient Safety Handbook , 2004 .

[18]  Todd Pawlicki,et al.  Quality in radiation oncology. , 2007, Medical physics.

[19]  Christopher S Kim,et al.  The application of lean thinking to the care of patients with bone and brain metastasis with radiation therapy. , 2007, Journal of oncology practice.

[20]  D L McShan,et al.  The impact of treatment complexity and computer-control delivery technology on treatment delivery errors. , 1998, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[21]  Eric C Ford,et al.  Evaluation of safety in a radiation oncology setting using failure mode and effects analysis. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  L. Norris Errors in Radiation Therapy , 2009 .

[23]  Davis Rn The Checklist Manifesto. How to get things right , 2010 .

[24]  Lawrence B Marks,et al.  The impact of advanced technologies on treatment deviations in radiation treatment delivery. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  G. McGough The checklist manifesto: how to get things right Atul Gawande The checklist manifesto: how to get things right Metropolitan Books £12.99 224pp 9780805091748 0805091742 , 2010 .

[26]  Jean-Pierre Bissonnette,et al.  Error in the delivery of radiation therapy: results of a quality assurance review. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Peter J Pronovost,et al.  Safe Patients, Smart Hospitals: How One Doctor's Checklist Can Help Us Change Health Care from the Inside Out , 2010 .

[28]  Eric C Ford,et al.  How safe is safe? Risk in radiotherapy. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  Chris Williams Oncology , 1990, The Lancet.

[30]  D. Gaffney,et al.  Facilitation of radiotherapeutic error by computerized record and verify systems. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Pamela Mazzocato,et al.  Lean thinking in healthcare: a realist review of the literature , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.