Toward a Plan for Using National Assessment To Ensure Continuous Improvement of Higher Education. Draft.

An outline is provided for a national educational assessment and improvement plan as suggested by the National Education Goals of 1990. The following implicit assumptions underlie National Education Oblective 5.5: (1) abilities to think critically, communicate effectively, and solve problems can be defined and the definitions can be agreed upon as desired instructional objectives; (2) defined abillties can be taught in ways that engage students and promote learning; (3) reliable and valid measures of these abilities can be identified and created; (4) measures of student attainment can be administered to college graduates in settings that encourage their best efforts; and (5) results of such assessment will be used to improve instruction. Under prevailing conditions in American higher education, little support for these assumptions exists. Current measurement theory is inadequate to provide direction for teaching and learning, and the act of assessing student abilities will 'lot, in and of itself, improve those abilities. If decision makers believe that the national interest will be best served by a comprehensive postsecondary assessment program, the principles of continuous improvement applied in industry should be used to link faculty goal-setting, staff development, assessment of instructional resources and student outcomes, and uses of assessment results for educational improvement. A 55-item list of references is included. Reviews by N. Frederiksen and by B. Wright and T. Marchese of this position paper are provided. (SLD)

[1]  F. Rebelsky,et al.  Professors As Teachers , 1972 .

[2]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Methodological Advances in Analyzing the Effects of Schools and Classrooms on Student Learning , 1988 .

[3]  F. Lord A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  G. Pike A Comparison of the College Outcome Measures Program (COMP) Exam and the ETS Academic Profile. , 1988 .

[5]  Gary W. Peterson A Meta-Evaluation of a Generic Skills Approach to Evaluating Academic Programs. , 1982 .

[6]  T. Banta Assessment as an Instrument of State Funding Policy. , 1988 .

[7]  D. Perkins,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 1988 .

[8]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  How college affects students , 1991 .

[9]  E. Boyer Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[10]  G. Pike A Comparison of the College Outcome Measures Program (COMP) and the Collegiate Assessment of Academic Proficiency (CAAP) Exams. , 1989 .

[11]  G. Wiggins Teaching to the (Authentic) Test. , 1989 .

[12]  G. Pike,et al.  Methods for comparing outcomes assessment instruments , 1989 .

[13]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[14]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[15]  R. Forsyth Do NAEP Scales Yield Valid Criterion‐Referenced Interpretations? , 1991 .

[16]  Hunter M. Breland,et al.  Remote Scoring of Essays. College Board Report No. 88-3. , 1988 .

[17]  Henry Braun CALIBRATION OF ESSAY READERS FINAL REPORT , 1986 .

[18]  L. Cronbach,et al.  How we should measure "change": Or should we? , 1970 .

[19]  G. Miller,et al.  How children learn words. , 1987, Scientific American.

[20]  S. Elam The 22nd Annual Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes toward the Public Schools. , 1990 .

[21]  Rebecca Zwick Effects of Item Order and Context on Estimation of NAEP Reading Proficiency , 1991 .

[22]  D. W. Farmer,et al.  Enhancing Student Learning: Emphasizing Essential Competencies in Academic Programs. , 1988 .

[23]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  New Directions in Educational Assessment , 1989 .

[24]  Peter A. Facione,et al.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction (The Delphi Report) , 1990 .

[25]  Hunter M. Breland,et al.  Remote Scoring of Essays , 1988 .

[26]  G. Hanson Critical Issues in the Assessment of Value Added in Education. , 1988 .

[27]  D. Perkins,et al.  Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound? , 1989 .

[28]  C. Pace,et al.  The Undergraduates: A Report of Their Activities and Progress in College in the 1980's. , 1990 .

[29]  P. Moss,et al.  Investigating the Validity of a Locally Developed Critical Thinking Test , 1991 .

[30]  Larry Cuban,et al.  Policy and Research Dilemmas in the Teaching of Reasoning: Unplanned Designs , 1984 .

[31]  P. Facione Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. , 1990 .

[32]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  A Systems Approach to Educational Testing , 1989 .

[33]  R. Sternberg Teaching Critical Thinking, Part 1: Are We Making Critical Mistakes?. , 1985 .

[34]  R. Sternberg Teaching Critical Thinking, Part 2: Possible Solutions. , 1985 .