The Development of Sensitivity of Kenetic, Binocular and Pictorial Depth Information in Human Infants

A program of research is described that explores the development of sensitivity to three classes of spatial information in human infants. The research suggests that sensitivity to kinetic, binocular and pictorial depth information develops in a fixed sequence. Some sensitivity to kinetic information may be present at birth or soon thereafter; sensitivity to binocular information appears between three and five months; and sensitivity to static monocular information appears between five and 7 months of age. These findings may direct research on the development of neural mechanisms that underlie the emergence of responsiveness to spatial information in human infants.

[1]  Albert Yonas,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to familiar size as information for distance. , 1982 .

[2]  R. D. Walk Monocular Compared to Binocular Depth Perception in Human Infants , 1968, Science.

[3]  A. Yonas,et al.  Infants’ sensitivity to the depth cue of shading , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  Albert Yonas,et al.  Development of sensitivity to static pictorial depth information , 1973 .

[5]  W. Epstein,et al.  RELATIVE SIZE IN ISOLATION AS A STIMULUS FOR RELATIVE PERCEIVED DISTANCE. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  L. Vinci The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. , 1952 .

[7]  George A. Kaplan,et al.  Kinetic disruption of optical texture: The perception of depth at an edge , 1969 .

[8]  H. Ono,et al.  Apparent distance as a function of familiar size. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Coding theory of visual pattern completion. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  A. Yonas,et al.  Young infant's sensitivity to optical information for collision. , 1979, Canadian journal of psychology.

[11]  W. Epstein,et al.  NONRELATIONAL JUDGEMENT OF SIZE AND DISTANCE. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  A. Chapanis,et al.  Interposition as a Cue for the Perception of Relative Distance , 1953 .

[14]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[15]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size , 1976 .

[16]  A Yonas,et al.  A comparison of monocular and binocular depth perception in 5- and 7-month-old infants. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[17]  Patrick Henry Winston,et al.  The psychology of computer vision , 1976, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  C V Newman,et al.  Familiar and relative size cues and surface texture as determinants of relative distance judgments. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  J E HOCHBERG,et al.  Relative size vs. familiar size in the perception of represented depth. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[20]  Berthold K. P. Horn Obtaining shape from shading information , 1989 .

[21]  W. Epstein The Influence of Assumed Size on Apparent Distance , 1963 .

[22]  Walter C. Gogel,et al.  Failure of familiar size to determine a metric for visually perceived distance , 1975 .

[23]  J. Gibson The perception of the visual world , 1951 .

[24]  D J McArthur,et al.  Computer vision and perceptual psychology. , 1982, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  J. Fagan,et al.  Infants' delayed recognition memory and forgetting. , 1973, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  Myron L. Braunstein,et al.  Depth perception through motion , 1976 .

[27]  E. Brunswik,et al.  In defense of probabilistic functionalism: a reply. , 1955, Psychological review.

[28]  Lee Dn,et al.  The optic flow field: the foundation of vision. , 1980 .

[29]  Rebecca K. Jones,et al.  Why two eyes are better than one: The two views of binocular vision. , 1981 .

[30]  W. Epstein,et al.  SOME CONDITIONS OF THE EFFECT OF RELATIVE SIZE ON PERCEIVED RELATIVE DISTANCE. , 1965, American Journal of Psychology.

[31]  Allen R. Hanson,et al.  Computer Vision Systems , 1978 .

[32]  Leslie B. Cohen,et al.  Infant perception: From sensation to cognition , 1975 .

[33]  T G Bower,et al.  The visual world of infants. , 1966, Scientific American.

[34]  C Owsley,et al.  The Role of Motion in Infants' Perception of Solid Shape , 1983, Perception.

[35]  Julian Hochberg,et al.  Familiar Size and Subception in Perceived Depth , 1953 .

[36]  B Rogers,et al.  Motion Parallax as an Independent Cue for Depth Perception , 1979, Perception.

[37]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[38]  A Yonas,et al.  Sensitivity to binocular depth information in infants. , 1976, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[39]  A Yonas,et al.  Development of Sensitivity to Information Provided by Cast Shadows in Pictures , 1978, Perception.

[40]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Stereoscopic Discrimination in Infants , 1976 .

[41]  R. D. Walk,et al.  Visual Depth Perception of a 10-Month-Old Monocular Human Infant , 1962, Science.

[42]  W. H. Ittelson Size as a cue to distance: static localization. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.

[43]  G. Johansson On theories for visual space perception. A letter to Gibson. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[44]  S. Dumais,et al.  Stereopsis in human infants. , 1980, Science.

[45]  Gunnar Johansson,et al.  Visual Event Perception , 1978 .

[46]  R. Held,et al.  Stereoacuity of human infants. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  E. Brunswik Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[48]  A. Yonas,et al.  Infants' perception of pictorially specified interposition. , 1984, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  A Yonas,et al.  Development of sensitivity to pictorial depth. , 1978, Science.

[50]  David L. Waltz,et al.  Generating Semantic Descriptions From Drawings of Scenes With Shadows , 1972 .

[51]  Albert Yonas,et al.  Reaching as a measure of infants' spatial perception. , 1985 .

[52]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  Some determinants of phenomenal overlapping. , 1957, The American journal of psychology.

[53]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[54]  Albert Yonas,et al.  An Approach to the Study of Infant Space Perception , 1975 .

[55]  Albert Yonas,et al.  The development of blinking in response to impending collision in preterm, full-term, and postterm infants* , 1980 .

[56]  A. Ames Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .

[57]  M. B. Clowes,et al.  On Seeing Things , 1971, Artif. Intell..

[58]  A. Yonas,et al.  Sensitivity of 5- and 7-month-old infants to pictorial depth information , 1981 .

[59]  R Pasnak,et al.  The Effect of Familiar Size at Familiar Distances , 1982, Perception.

[60]  C. Hofsten Binocular convergence as a determinant of reaching behavior in infancy , 1977 .

[61]  R. Aslin Development of binocular fixation in human infants. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[62]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .

[63]  W. Schiff PERCEPTION OF IMPENDING COLLISION: A STUDY OF VISUALLY DIRECTED AVOIDANT BEHAVIOR. , 1965, Psychological monographs.

[64]  Edward Bradford Titchener,et al.  A text-book of psychology , 1909 .