Do congenital prosopagnosia and the other-race effect affect the same face recognition mechanisms?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. Schultz,et al. Corrigendum: Do congenital prosopagnosia and the other-race effect affect the same face recognition mechanisms? , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[2] Jeremy Wilmer,et al. Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability , 2013, Cognition.
[3] Martin Eimer,et al. The face-sensitive N170 component in developmental prosopagnosia , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[4] Galit Yovel,et al. A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test Format , 2012, PloS one.
[5] R. Kimchi,et al. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[6] M. Coltheart,et al. Covert face recognition in congenital prosopagnosia: A group study , 2012, Cortex.
[7] Marco Catani,et al. At the forefront of clinical neuroscience , 2012, Cortex.
[8] J. Schultz,et al. The role of featural and configural information for perceived similarity between faces , 2011 .
[9] Galia Avidan,et al. Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[10] Isabel Gauthier,et al. Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.
[11] Tobias Elze,et al. Deficits in Long-Term Recognition Memory Reveal Dissociated Subtypes in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2011, PloS one.
[12] Kurt Hugenberg,et al. The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. , 2010, Psychological review.
[13] H. Bülthoff,et al. Visual and haptic perceptual spaces show high similarity in humans. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[14] G. Rhodes,et al. Processes Underlying the Cross-Race Effect: An Investigation of Holistic, Featural, and Relational Processing of Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2010, Perception.
[15] E. McKone,et al. Asia has the global advantage: Race and visual attention , 2010, Vision Research.
[16] F. Mast,et al. Configural and featural processing in humans with congenital prosopagnosia. , 2010, Advances in cognitive psychology.
[17] Allison B Sekuler,et al. Holistic Processing Is Not Correlated With Face-Identification Accuracy , 2010, Psychological science.
[18] Galia Avidan,et al. Functional MRI Reveals Compromised Neural Integrity of the Face Processing Network in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2009, Current Biology.
[19] M. Behrmann,et al. An integrative approach towards understanding the psychological and neural basis of congenital prosopagnosia. , 2009 .
[20] Ingo Kennerknecht,et al. Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population , 2008, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.
[21] Rachael E. Jack,et al. Culture Shapes How We Look at Faces , 2008, PloS one.
[22] C. Carbon,et al. Neural and genetic foundations of face recognition and prosopagnosia. , 2008, Journal of neuropsychology.
[23] G. Rhodes,et al. An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.
[24] Bentin Shlomo. The role of featural and configural processing in own- and other-race face classification: Behavioral and ERP evidence , 2008 .
[25] D. Maurer,et al. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.
[26] Claus-Christian Carbon,et al. Faces as Objects of Non-Expertise: Processing of Thatcherised Faces in Congenital Prosopagnosia , 2007, Perception.
[27] Lynn C. Robertson,et al. Functional Plasticity in Ventral Temporal Cortex following Cognitive Rehabilitation of a Congenital Prosopagnosic , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] Raymond J. Dolan,et al. Role of Features and Second-order Spatial Relations in Face Discrimination, Face Recognition, and Individual Face Skills: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[29] Ken Nakayama,et al. No global processing deficit in the Navon task in 14 developmental prosopagnosics. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.
[30] Sarah E. MacPherson,et al. Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.
[31] Nao Ninomiya,et al. The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..
[32] K. Nakayama,et al. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[33] Catherine J. Mondloch,et al. What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? , 2006, Brain and Cognition.
[34] Bruno Rossion,et al. Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.
[35] Gillian Rhodes,et al. Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[36] Galit Yovel,et al. Specialized Face Perception Mechanisms Extract Both Part and Spacing Information: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[37] Rafael Malach,et al. Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[38] Galia Avidan,et al. Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[39] J. P. Rushton,et al. THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY , 2005 .
[40] Brad Duchaine,et al. Dissociations of Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[41] Q. Vuong,et al. The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.
[42] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .
[43] N. Kanwisher,et al. Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.
[44] Mariya V Cherkasova,et al. Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients , 2003, Brain and Cognition.
[45] Irene Daum,et al. Developmental Prosopagnosia: A Review , 2003, Behavioural neurology.
[46] D. Maurer,et al. The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[47] J. Brigham,et al. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .
[48] G. Hole,et al. Featural and Configurational Processes in the Recognition of Faces of Different Familiarity , 2000, Perception.
[49] A. Freire,et al. The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.
[50] Thomas Vetter,et al. A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.
[51] Matthew Turk,et al. A Morphable Model For The Synthesis Of 3D Faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.
[52] H. Bülthoff,et al. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.
[53] David Beymer,et al. Face recognition under varying pose , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[54] Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz,et al. Modeling seashells , 1992, SIGGRAPH.
[55] Neil A. Macmillan,et al. Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .
[56] G. Rhodes,et al. Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.