The smashed filter for compressive classification and target recognition

The theory of compressive sensing (CS) enables the reconstruction of a sparse or compressible image or signal from a small set of linear, non-adaptive (even random) projections. However, in many applications, including object and target recognition, we are ultimately interested in making a decision about an image rather than computing a reconstruction. We propose here a framework for compressive classification that operates directly on the compressive measurements without first reconstructing the image. We dub the resulting dimensionally reduced matched filter the smashed filter. The first part of the theory maps traditional maximum likelihood hypothesis testing into the compressive domain; we find that the number of measurements required for a given classification performance level does not depend on the sparsity or compressibility of the images but only on the noise level. The second part of the theory applies the generalized maximum likelihood method to deal with unknown transformations such as the translation, scale, or viewing angle of a target object. We exploit the fact the set of transformed images forms a low-dimensional, nonlinear manifold in the high-dimensional image space. We find that the number of measurements required for a given classification performance level grows linearly in the dimensionality of the manifold but only logarithmically in the number of pixels/samples and image classes. Using both simulations and measurements from a new single-pixel compressive camera, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the smashed filter for target classification using very few measurements.

[1]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Sparse Signal Detection from Incoherent Projections , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing Proceedings.

[4]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  The multiscale structure of non-differentiable image manifolds , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[5]  Donald E. Waagen,et al.  Random subspaces and SAR classification efficacy , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Random Projections of Smooth Manifolds , 2009, Found. Comput. Math..

[7]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  A new compressive imaging camera architecture using optical-domain compression , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[8]  J. Haupt,et al.  Compressive Sampling for Signal Classification , 2006, 2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[9]  Stephen Smale,et al.  Finding the Homology of Submanifolds with High Confidence from Random Samples , 2008, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[10]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Detection and estimation with compressive measurements , 2006 .

[11]  A Mahalanobis,et al.  Distance-classifier correlation filters for multiclass target recognition. , 1996, Applied optics.