Pneumatic Nail Guns: Revisiting Trigger Recommendations

IN BRIEF •Use of a pneumatic nail gun with a sequential actuation trigger (SAT) significantly diminishes the risk for acute traumatic injury compared to use of a nail gun equipped with a contact actuation trigger (CAT). •A theoretically based increased risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders from use of an SAT nail gun, relative to CAT, appears unlikely and remains unproven. •Based on current knowledge, use of CAT nail guns cannot be justified as a safe alternative to SAT nail guns. The authors, who are ergonomists and occupational safety researchers, recommend the use of the SAT for all nail gun tasks in the construction industry. Pneumatic Nail Guns Revisiting Trigger Recommendations

[1]  Barbara Silverstein,et al.  PNEUMATIC NAILER INJURIES A Report on Washington State 1990-1998 , 2001 .

[2]  Brian D Lowe,et al.  Residential Building Stakeholders' Attitudes and Beliefs regarding Nail Gun Injury Risks and Prevention , 2014, New solutions : a journal of environmental and occupational health policy : NS.

[4]  Hester Lipscomb,et al.  Nail gun injuries among construction workers. , 2003, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[5]  Nail-gun injuries treated in emergency departments--United States, 2001-2005. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[6]  H J Lipscomb,et al.  Nail gun injuries in residential carpentry: lessons from active injury surveillance , 2003, Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention.

[7]  James Albers,et al.  Finger Tendon Travel Associated with Sequential Trigger Nail Gun Use , 2013, IIE transactions on occupational ergonomics and human factors.