Applicability and transferability of interventions in evidence-based public health.

The context in which public health programmes operate can play an important role in influencing their implementation and effectiveness. An intervention that has been shown to be effective in one setting may turn out to be ineffective somewhere else, even supposing it can be implemented there. Therefore, systematic reviews of public health interventions should appraise the applicability of the intervention process and the transferability of the intervention effectiveness to other localities. However, applicability and transferability appraisal is seldom reported in systematic reviews of public health and health promotion interventions. This paper aims to introduce an innovative approach to bridging this gap. A list of attributes that may impact on applicability and transferability can be developed, based on knowledge of the proposed intervention. Then the applicability and transferability of the intervention to the local setting can be rated, and given a score, based on knowledge of the local setting. This approach provides a useful tool for evaluating public health interventions and provides a reliable basis for informed decision making in resource-poor settings, where rigorous primary studies are lacking and where very limited resources put a high demand on evidence-based approaches to health promotion.

[1]  G. Colditz,et al.  How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence , 1999 .

[2]  Cindy Farquhar,et al.  3 The Cochrane Library , 1996 .

[3]  Z. W. Ma,et al.  Homosexual Behaviors in Contemporary China , 1996 .

[4]  E. Beck,et al.  Changing sexual attitudes and behaviour in China: implications for the spread of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases. , 1999, AIDS care.

[5]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J. Cuzick,et al.  Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  B. Zhang,et al.  A survey of men who have sex with men: mainland China. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[8]  Zhang Bei-chuan,et al.  A survey of men who have sex with men: mainland China. , 2000 .

[9]  L. Rychetnik,et al.  Advocating evidence-based health promotion: reflections and a way forward. , 2004, Health promotion international.

[10]  M. Frommer,et al.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions , 2002, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[11]  Don Nutbeam,et al.  Evaluating Health Promotion—Progress, Problems and solutions , 1998 .

[12]  T. Lancaster,et al.  Community interventions for reducing smoking among adults. , 2002, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  O. Razum,et al.  Evidence-based Public Health , 2008, Medizinische Klinik.

[14]  I Scott,et al.  A Schema for Evaluating Evidence on Public Health Interventions. Version 4. , 2003 .

[15]  Don Nutbeam,et al.  Evaluating Health Promotion , 1999, BMJ.