A Transparent and Intuitive Modeling Framework and Software for Efficient Land Allocation

The purpose of this research is to better conserve biodiversity by improving land allocation modeling software. Here we introduce a planning support framework designed to be understood by and useful to land managers, stakeholders, and other decision-makers. With understanding comes trust and engagement, which often yield better implementation of model results. To do this, we break from traditional software such as Zonation and Marxan with Zones to prototype software that instead first asks the project team and stakeholders to make a straightforward multi-criteria decision tree used for traditional site evaluation analyses. The results can be used as is or fed into an algorithm for identifying a land allocation solution that is efficient in meeting several objectives including maximizing habitat representation, connectivity, and adjacency at a set cost budget. We tested the framework in five pilot regions and share the lessons learned from each, with a detailed description and evaluation of the fifth (in the central Sierra Nevada mountains of California) where the software effectively met the multiple objectives, for multiple zones (Restoration, Innovation, and Observation Zones). The framework is sufficiently general that it can be applied to a wide range of land use planning efforts.

[1]  Carrie A. Schloss,et al.  New concepts, models, and assessments of climate-wise connectivity , 2018, Environmental Research Letters.

[2]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Implementation strategies for systematic conservation planning , 2018, Ambio.

[3]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[4]  A. Bennett,et al.  Where and when to revegetate: a quantitative method for scheduling landscape reconstruction. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Margot W. Parkes,et al.  Integrating Catchment Ecosystems and Community Health: The Value of Participatory Action Research , 2001 .

[6]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[7]  David M. Theobald,et al.  Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[8]  N Voulvoulis,et al.  The Appropriateness of Multicriteria Analysis in Environmental Decision-Making Problems , 2005, Environmental technology.

[9]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Efficient Conservation in a Utility-Maximization Framework , 2006 .

[11]  Greg Brown,et al.  Understanding the effects of different social data on selecting priority conservation areas , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Maximizing return on investment in conservation , 2007 .

[13]  Scott F. Heron,et al.  Risk‐sensitive planning for conserving coral reefs under rapid climate change , 2018, Conservation Letters.

[14]  Wouter Buytaert,et al.  User-driven design of decision support systems for polycentric environmental resources management , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[15]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Complementarity, biodiversity viability analysis, and policy-based algorithms for conservation , 2003 .

[16]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  A method for building corridors in spatial conservation prioritization , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[17]  Robert M. Campellone,et al.  The iCASS Platform: Nine principles for landscape conservation design , 2018, Landscape and Urban Planning.

[18]  R. Milo,et al.  The biomass distribution on Earth , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  Prioritizing farmland preservation cost-effectively for multiple objectives , 2006 .

[20]  S. Andelman,et al.  Conserving Biodiversity Efficiently: What to Do, Where, and When , 2007, PLoS biology.

[21]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[22]  Arika Ligmann-Zielinska,et al.  Spatially-explicit integrated uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of criteria weights in multicriteria land suitability evaluation , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[23]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world , 2004 .

[24]  Frank W. Davis,et al.  TAMARIN: a landscape framework for evaluating economic incentives for rainforest restoration , 2004 .

[25]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  The science/policy interface in logic-based evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability , 2003 .

[26]  F. Taheri,et al.  Co-existence of GM, conventional and organic crops in developing countries: Main debates and concerns , 2018, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[27]  H. Possingham,et al.  Hitting the target and missing the point: target‐based conservation planning in context , 2009 .

[28]  Timothy Sheehan,et al.  A platform-independent fuzzy logic modeling framework for environmental decision support , 2016, Ecol. Informatics.

[29]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Setting Conservation Priorities , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Martin C. Maguire,et al.  Methods to support human-centred design , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[31]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  Mapping Uncertainty in Conservation Assessment as a Means Toward Improved Conservation Planning and Implementation , 2012 .

[32]  R. Cowling,et al.  The role of private conservation areas in biodiversity representation and target achievement within the Little Karoo region, South Africa , 2009 .

[33]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  The plan of the day: managing the dynamic transition from regional conservation designs to local conservation actions , 2013 .

[35]  G. Aplet,et al.  A portfolio approach to managing ecological risks of global change , 2017 .