Differences in the scale dependence of dispersivity and retardation factors estimated from forced‐gradient and uniform flow tracer tests in three‐dimensional physically and chemically heterogeneous porous media

[1] Parameters estimated from forced-gradient tracer tests are often used to simulate the transport of large contaminant plumes under natural gradients, yet the difference in the flow system and the plume size is important. Recent intermediate-scale experiments and numerical simulations in two dimensions have suggested that dispersivities from forced-gradient tracer tests involving a small source may not be adequate to simulate the migration of a large plume under natural-gradient conditions. The differences in the scale dependence of effective dispersivities Aeff (for conservative and linearly sorbing solutes) and retardation factors Reff due to changes in the flow configuration and source size are investigated here on the basis of numerical simulations in three-dimensional physically and chemically heterogeneous porous media. It is shown that discrepancies observed in two dimensions due to small-source size and nonuniform flow conditions are not so dramatic in typical field settings because a small vertical correlation scale permits a tracer source to sample the medium heterogeneity more effectively. We further analyzed the benefit of using multiple injections in tracer tests by evaluating (1) the reduction in dispersivity due to the small-source size and (2) the uncertainty in dispersivity estimates (coefficient of variation). The distance scales at which Aeff and Reff from single and multiple injection convergent flow tracer tests approach constant values are significantly greater than analogous values for natural gradients. When dispersivities are estimated from convergent flow tracer tests involving multiple injections, asymptotic Aeff values are the same as those obtained from large-source natural-gradient tests. In both convergent flows and natural-gradient systems, in the case of a negative correlation between lnK and lnKd random fields, Reff estimated from temporal moments of breakthrough curves decrease with distance, while Reff estimated from the center of mass velocities of the tracer plumes increase with time, both asymptotically approaching the arithmetic mean of the retardation factor.

[1]  E. Sudicky.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[2]  Paul W. Reimus,et al.  Testing and parameterizing a conceptual model for solute transport in a fractured granite using multiple tracers in a forced‐gradient test , 2003 .

[3]  J. Feyen,et al.  Solute transport in a heterogeneous soil for boundary and initial conditions: Evaluation of first‐order approximations , 1998 .

[4]  Robert W. Gillham,et al.  Sorption nonideality during organic contaminant transport in porous media , 1989 .

[5]  W. Stumm.  Chemistry of the solid-water interface , 1992 .

[6]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Effect of radial flow on deviations from local equilibrium during sorbing solute transport through homogeneous soils , 1986 .

[7]  Mark N. Goltz,et al.  Using the method of moments to analyze three-dimensional diffusion-limited solute transport from tem , 1987 .

[8]  R. L. Naff,et al.  Nonreactive and reactive solute transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous porous media: Mean displacement, plume spreading, and uncertainty , 1994 .

[9]  G. Matheron,et al.  Is transport in porous media always diffusive? A counterexample , 1980 .

[10]  Bruce A. Robinson,et al.  New form of dispersion tensor for axisymmetric porous media with implementation in particle tracking , 2002 .

[11]  M. Kendall,et al.  The advanced theory of statistics , 1945 .

[12]  S. P. Garabedian,et al.  Large-scale dispersive transport in aquifers : field experiments and reactive transport theory , 1987 .

[13]  G. Dagan,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 1. Constant head boundary , 1988 .

[14]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Plume scale‐dependent dispersion in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Eulerian analysis and three‐dimensional aquifers , 1993 .

[15]  Allan L. Gutjahr,et al.  Stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in a stratified aquifer , 1979 .

[16]  Gedeon Dagan,et al.  Solute transport in divergent radial flow through heterogeneous porous media , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Andrew F. B. Tompson,et al.  Numerical simulation of chemical migration in physically and chemically heterogeneous porous media , 1993 .

[18]  Z. J. Kabala,et al.  A stochastic model of reactive solute transport with time‐varying velocity in a heterogeneous aquifer , 1991 .

[19]  Sabine Attinger,et al.  Temporal behavior of a solute cloud in a heterogeneous porous medium: 1. Point‐like injection , 2000 .

[20]  Mark N. Goltz,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 3. Retardation estimates and mass balances for organic solutes , 1986 .

[21]  H. Rajaram.  Time and scale dependent effective retardation factors in heterogeneous aquifers , 1997 .

[22]  R. L. Naff.  On the nature of the dispersive flux in saturated heterogeneous porous media. , 1990 .

[23]  G. Dagan.  Flow and transport in porous formations , 1989 .

[24]  David L. Freyberg,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 2. Spatial moments and the advection and dispersion of nonreactive tracers , 1986 .

[25]  Albert J. Valocchi,et al.  Validity of the local equilibrium assumption for modeling sorbing solute transport through homogeneous soils , 1985 .

[26]  D. Freyberg,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 1. Approach and overview of plume movement , 1986 .

[27]  Claire R. Tiedeman,et al.  Evaluation of longitudinal dispersivity estimates from simulated forced- and natural-gradient tracer tests in heterogeneous aquifers , 2004 .

[28]  Graham E. Fogg,et al.  Random-Walk Simulation of Transport in Heterogeneous Porous Media: Local Mass-Conservation Problem and Implementation Methods , 1996 .

[29]  Kathryn W. Thorbjarnarson,et al.  A forced-gradient experiment on solute transport in the Borden aquifer: 1. Experimental methods and , 1994 .

[30]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[31]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Differences in the scale-dependence of dispersivity estimated from temporal and spatial moments in chemically and physically heterogeneous porous media , 2005 .

[32]  T. Illangasekare,et al.  Intermediate‐scale experiments and numerical simulations of transport under radial flow in a two‐dimensional heterogeneous porous medium , 2000 .

[33]  Rutherford Aris,et al.  On the dispersion of linear kinematic waves , 1958, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[34]  Dispersive Particle Transport: Identification of Macroscale Behavior in Heterogeneous Stratified Subsurface Flows , 1999 .

[35]  Harihar Rajaram,et al.  Conservative and sorptive forced‐gradient and uniform flow tracer tests in a three‐dimensional laboratory test aquifer , 2004 .

[36]  Sean A. McKenna,et al.  Tracer tests in a fractured dolomite: 3. Double‐porosity, multiple‐rate mass transfer processes in convergent flow tracer tests , 2001 .

[37]  R. Ababou,et al.  Implementation of the three‐dimensional turning bands random field generator , 1989 .

[38]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Spatial Variability of Strontium Distribution Coefficients and Their Correlation With Hydraulic Conductivity in the Canadian Forces Base Borden Aquifer , 1991 .

[39]  M. Celia,et al.  Large-scale natural gradient tracer test in sand and gravel, Cape Cod, Massachusetts, 2, Analysis of spatial moments for a nonreactive tracer , 1991 .

[40]  Yoram Rubin,et al.  Stochastic analysis of boundaries effects on head spatial variability in heterogeneous aquifers: 2. Impervious boundary , 1989 .

[41]  J. Bear.  Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[42]  C.A.J. Appelo,et al.  FLOW AND TRANSPORT , 2004 .

[43]  R. L. Naff,et al.  High‐resolution Monte Carlo simulation of flow and conservative transport in heterogeneous porous media: 1. Methodology and flow results , 1998 .

[44]  Xian-Huan Wen,et al.  The Constant Displacement Scheme for Tracking Particles in Heterogeneous Aquifers , 1996 .

[45]  W. W. Wood,et al.  Large-Scale Natural Gradient Tracer Test in Sand and Gravel, , 1991 .

[46]  L. Gelhar,et al.  Stochastic analysis of sorption macrokinetics in heterogeneous aquifers , 1996 .