Calibration of laser scanner and camera fusion system for intelligent vehicles using Nelder–Mead optimization

A novel method is presented here for the calibration of a sensor fusion system for intelligent vehicles. In this example, the sensors are a camera and a laser scanner which observe the same scene from different viewpoints. The method employs the Nelder–Mead direct search algorithm to minimize the sum of squared errors between the image coordinates and the re-projected laser data by iteratively adjusting and improving the calibration parameters. The method is applied to a real set of data collected from a test vehicle. Using only 11 well-spaced target points observable by each sensor, 12 intrinsic and extrinsic parameters indicating the position relationship between the sensors can be estimated to give an accurate projection. Experiments show that the method can project the laser points onto the image plane with an average error of 1.01 pixels (1.51 pixels worst case).

[1]  Long Quan,et al.  Linear N-Point Camera Pose Determination , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Axel Pinz,et al.  Robust Pose Estimation from a Planar Target , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[3]  I. Carlbom,et al.  Planar Geometric Projections and Viewing Transformations , 1978, CSUR.

[4]  Yingping Huang,et al.  Minimisation of alignment error between a camera and a laser range finder using Nelder-Mead simplex direct search , 2010, 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[5]  Helder Araújo,et al.  A Fully Projective Formulation to Improve the Accuracy of Lowe's Pose-Estimation Algorithm , 1998, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  Olivier Strauss,et al.  Calibration of a multi-sensor system laser rangefinder/camera , 1995, Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles '95. Symposium.

[7]  Robert Pless,et al.  Extrinsic calibration of a camera and laser range finder (improves camera calibration) , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[8]  森田 茂之,et al.  Geometry of differential forms , 2001 .

[9]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Fast and Globally Convergent Pose Estimation from Video Images , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Patrick Rives,et al.  Calibration between a central catadioptric camera and a laser range finder for robotic applications , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[11]  Mongi A. Abidi,et al.  A New Efficient and Direct Solution for Pose Estimation Using Quadrangular Targets: Algorithm and Evaluation , 1995, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Radu Horaud,et al.  An analytic solution for the perspective 4-point problem , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Iterative Pose Estimation Using Coplanar Feature Points , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[15]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  Accurate Non-Iterative O(n) Solution to the PnP Problem , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[16]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[17]  J. Rafael Sendra,et al.  Algebraic Lens Distortion Model Estimation , 2010, Image Process. Line.

[18]  R. Steiner History and progress on accurate measurements of the Planck constant , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.