Application and Evaluation of Control Modes for Risk-Based Engine Performance Enhancements

The engine control system for civil transport aircraft imposes operational limits on the propulsion system to ensure compliance with safety standards. However, during certain emergency situations, aircraft survivability may benefit from engine performance beyond its normal limits despite the increased risk of failure. Accordingly, control modes were developed to improve the maximum thrust output and responsiveness of a generic high-bypass turbofan engine. The algorithms were designed such that the enhanced performance would always constitute an elevation in failure risk to a consistent predefined likelihood. This paper presents an application of these risk-based control modes to a combined engine/aircraft model. Through computer and piloted simulation tests, the aim is to present a notional implementation of these modes, evaluate their effects on a generic airframe, and demonstrate their usefulness during emergency flight situations. Results show that minimal control effort is required to compensate for the changes in flight dynamics due to control mode activation. The benefits gained from enhanced engine performance for various runway incursion scenarios are investigated. Finally, the control modes are shown to protect against potential instabilities during propulsion-only flight where all aircraft control surfaces are inoperable.

[1]  Jonathan S. Litt,et al.  A Novel Controller for Gas Turbine Engines with Aggressive Limit Management , 2011 .

[2]  Ryan D. May,et al.  Improving Engine Responsiveness during Approach through High Speed Idle Control , 2011 .

[3]  A. Karl Owen,et al.  Flight Simulator Evaluation of Enhanced Propulsion Control Modes for Emergency Operation , 2012, Infotech@Aerospace.

[4]  Nhan Nguyen,et al.  Flight-Propulsion Response Requirements for Directional Stability and Control , 2010 .

[5]  Ten-Huei Guo,et al.  Design and Demonstration of Emergency Control Modes for Enhanced Engine Performance , 2013 .

[6]  Ryan D. May,et al.  The Effect of Faster Engine Response on the Lateral Directional Control of a Damaged Aircraft , 2011 .

[7]  Ryan D. May,et al.  A Sensitivity Study of Commercial Aircraft Engine Response for Emergency Situations , 2011 .

[8]  Ten-Huei Guo,et al.  Resilient Propulsion Control Research for the NASA Integrated Resilient Aircraft Control (IRAC) Project , 2007 .

[9]  Thomas M. Lavelle,et al.  A High-Fidelity Simulation of a Generic Commercial Aircraft Engine and Controller , 2010 .

[10]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Adaptive Engine Control with Multiple Constraints , 2011 .

[11]  Ten-Huei Guo,et al.  A Risk Assessment Architecture for Enhanced Engine Operation , 2010 .

[12]  James M. Urnes,et al.  Use of Propulsion Commands to Control Directional Stability of a Damaged Transport Aircraft , 2010 .

[13]  Trindel A. Maine,et al.  Development and Flight Evaluation of an Emergency Digital Flight Control System Using Only Engine Thrust on an F-15 Airplane , 1996 .

[14]  Ryan D. May,et al.  The Effect of Modified Control Limits on the Performance of a Generic Commercial Aircraft Engine , 2011 .

[15]  Frank W. Burcham,et al.  Controlling crippled aircraft-with throttles , 1991 .

[16]  Ryan D. May,et al.  Pilot-in-the-Loop Evaluation of a Yaw Rate to Throttle Feedback Control with Enhanced Engine Response , 2012 .

[17]  R. M. Hueschen,et al.  Development of the Transport Class Model (TCM) Aircraft Simulation From a Sub-Scale Generic Transport Model (GTM) Simulation , 2011 .

[18]  Benoit Lemaignan.  Flying with no Flight Controls: Handling Qualities Analyses of the Baghdad Event , 2005 .

[19]  Trindel A. Maine,et al.  Manual Manipulation of Engine Throttles for Emergency Flight Control , 2013 .

[20]  Ryan D. May,et al.  Control Design for a Generic Commercial Aircraft Engine , 2010 .