Large-scale evaluation of dynamically important residues in proteins predicted by the perturbation analysis of a coarse-grained elastic model

BackgroundsIt is increasingly recognized that protein functions often require intricate conformational dynamics, which involves a network of key amino acid residues that couple spatially separated functional sites. Tremendous efforts have been made to identify these key residues by experimental and computational means.ResultsWe have performed a large-scale evaluation of the predictions of dynamically important residues by a variety of computational protocols including three based on the perturbation and correlation analysis of a coarse-grained elastic model. This study is performed for two lists of test cases with >500 pairs of protein structures. The dynamically important residues predicted by the perturbation and correlation analysis are found to be strongly or moderately conserved in >67% of test cases. They form a sparse network of residues which are clustered both in 3D space and along protein sequence. Their overall conservation is attributed to their dynamic role rather than ligand binding or high network connectivity.ConclusionBy modeling how the protein structural fluctuations respond to residue-position-specific perturbations, our highly efficient perturbation and correlation analysis can be used to dissect the functional conformational changes in various proteins with a residue level of detail. The predictions of dynamically important residues serve as promising targets for mutational and functional studies.

[1]  Zhengshuang Shi,et al.  Networks for the allosteric control of protein kinases. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  Wenjun Zheng,et al.  Identification of dynamical correlations within the myosin motor domain by the normal mode analysis of an elastic network model. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D Thirumalai,et al.  Coupling between normal modes drives protein conformational dynamics: illustrations using allosteric transitions in myosin II. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[4]  Rafael Najmanovich,et al.  Side‐chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding , 2000, Proteins.

[5]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Network of dynamically important residues in the open/closed transition in polymerases is strongly conserved. , 2005, Structure.

[6]  G. Chirikjian,et al.  Elastic models of conformational transitions in macromolecules. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[7]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  D. Boehr,et al.  An NMR perspective on enzyme dynamics. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[9]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Low-frequency normal modes that describe allosteric transitions in biological nanomachines are robust to sequence variations , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[11]  Joost Schymkowitz,et al.  A systems biology perspective on protein structural dynamics and signal transduction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  Lila M Gierasch,et al.  The changing landscape of protein allostery. , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[13]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Normal mode analysis of macromolecular motions in a database framework: Developing mode concentration as a useful classifying statistic , 2002, Proteins.

[14]  M. Wall,et al.  Interactions in native binding sites cause a large change in protein dynamics. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[16]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: absence of a change in shape does not imply that allostery is not at play. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[18]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[19]  Hiroshi Wako,et al.  ProMode: a database of normal mode analyses on protein molecules with a full-atom model , 2004, Bioinform..

[20]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of normal mode analysis in modeling dynamics of biomolecular complexes. , 2005, Structure.

[21]  A. Becker,et al.  A structural model for actin-induced nucleotide release in myosin , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Engineering synthetic signaling proteins with ultrasensitive input/output control , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  M. Karplus,et al.  Signaling pathways of PDZ2 domain: A molecular dynamics interaction correlation analysis , 2009, Proteins.

[24]  M Karplus,et al.  Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  N. Go,et al.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding, and fluctuations by computer simulation. II. A. Three‐dimensional lattice model of lysozyme , 1978 .

[26]  L. Kay,et al.  NMR studies of protein structure and dynamics. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[27]  M. Karplus,et al.  A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis , 2007, Nature.

[28]  N. Go,et al.  Studies on protein folding, unfolding and fluctuations by computer simulation. I. The effect of specific amino acid sequence represented by specific inter-unit interactions. , 2009 .

[29]  David A Agard,et al.  Intramolecular signaling pathways revealed by modeling anisotropic thermal diffusion. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Csaba Böde,et al.  Network analysis of protein dynamics , 2007, FEBS letters.

[31]  Sebastian Doniach,et al.  Toward the mechanism of dynamical couplings and translocation in hepatitis C virus NS3 helicase using elastic network model , 2007, Proteins.

[32]  R. Ross Allosterism and cannabinoid CB(1) receptors: the shape of things to come. , 2007, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[33]  Wenjun Zheng,et al.  Normal‐mode‐based modeling of allosteric couplings that underlie cyclic conformational transition in F1 ATPase , 2009, Proteins.

[34]  M. Wall,et al.  Quantifying allosteric effects in proteins , 2005, Proteins.

[35]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[36]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[37]  J M Yon,et al.  Conformational dynamics and enzyme activity. , 1998, Biochimie.

[38]  Judith D. Cohn,et al.  Fast dynamics perturbation analysis for prediction of protein functional sites , 2008, BMC Structural Biology.

[39]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  A New Method for Coarse-Grained Elastic Normal-Mode Analysis. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[40]  H. Schaffhauser,et al.  Allosteric approaches to the targeting of G-protein-coupled receptors for novel drug discovery: a critical assessment. , 2007, Biochemical pharmacology.

[41]  YANQING CHEN,et al.  Algorithm 8 xx : CHOLMOD , supernodal sparse Cholesky factorization and update / downdate ∗ , 2006 .

[42]  Sebastian Doniach,et al.  MinActionPath: maximum likelihood trajectory for large-scale structural transitions in a coarse-grained locally harmonic energy landscape , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Aleksandr V. Smirnov,et al.  Watching a Protein as it Functions with 150-ps Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography , 2003, Science.

[44]  Perturbation-based Markovian Transmission Model for Macromolecular Machinery in Cell , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[45]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[46]  N. Goodey,et al.  Allosteric regulation and catalysis emerge via a common route. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[47]  I. Bahar,et al.  Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .

[48]  Chakra Chennubhotla,et al.  Signal Propagation in Proteins and Relation to Equilibrium Fluctuations , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  W. Lim,et al.  Reprogramming Control of an Allosteric Signaling Switch Through Modular Recombination , 2003, Science.

[50]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Modeling protein conformational changes by iterative fitting of distance constraints using reoriented normal modes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[51]  G. Hummer,et al.  Protein conformational transitions explored by mixed elastic network models , 2007, Proteins.

[52]  George N Phillips,et al.  Application of elastic network models to proteins in the crystalline state. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[53]  Guang Song,et al.  How well can we understand large-scale protein motions using normal modes of elastic network models? , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  HingeMaster: Normal mode hinge prediction approach and integration of complementary predictors , 2008, Proteins.

[55]  Masahide Kikkawa,et al.  Switch-based mechanism of kinesin motors , 2001, Nature.

[56]  Ryo Nitta,et al.  KIF1A Alternately Uses Two Loops to Bind Microtubules , 2004, Science.

[57]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Normal-modes-based prediction of protein conformational changes guided by distance constraints. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[58]  M. Karplus,et al.  Allostery and cooperativity revisited , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[59]  C. Chennubhotla,et al.  Markov propagation of allosteric effects in biomolecular systems: application to GroEL–GroES , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[60]  Dror Tobi,et al.  Allosteric changes in protein structure computed by a simple mechanical model: hemoglobin T<-->R2 transition. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[61]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Exploring the range of protein flexibility, from a structural proteomics perspective. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[62]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  MolMovDB: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in GroEL by analysis of correlated mutations , 2002, Proteins.

[64]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[65]  Shoji Takada,et al.  Folding-based molecular simulations reveal mechanisms of the rotary motor F1-ATPase. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Marek Cieplak,et al.  Universality classes in folding times of proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[67]  K Schulten,et al.  Protein domain movements: detection of rigid domains and visualization of hinges in comparisons of atomic coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[68]  Valentina Tozzini,et al.  Coarse-grained models for proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[69]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity, proteinquakes, and the energy landscapes of functional transitions in proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[71]  Qiang Cui,et al.  D. Riccardi, Q. Cui, and G. N. Phillips Jr. 2009. Application of elastic network models to proteins in the crystalline state. Biophys. J. 96:464-475 , 2009 .

[72]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[73]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[74]  Steven Hayward,et al.  Improvements in the analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: DynDom version 1.50. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[75]  M. Karplus,et al.  Implications of the quaternary twist allosteric model for the physiology and pathology of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[76]  Michael G. Lerner,et al.  Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases) , 2005, Proteins.

[77]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Allosteric transitions in the chaperonin GroEL are captured by a dominant normal mode that is most robust to sequence variations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[78]  J. Changeux,et al.  Allosteric Mechanisms of Signal Transduction , 2005, Science.

[79]  Adam W Van Wynsberghe,et al.  Protein structural variation in computational models and crystallographic data. , 2006, Structure.

[80]  Michael D. Daily,et al.  Local motions in a benchmark of allosteric proteins , 2007, Proteins.

[81]  R. Ranganathan,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.

[82]  Hassan A. Karimi,et al.  iGNM: a database of protein functional motions based on Gaussian Network Model , 2005, Bioinform..

[83]  M. Sternberg,et al.  An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[84]  M Karplus,et al.  Molecular switch in signal transduction: reaction paths of the conformational changes in ras p21. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[85]  Wenjun Zheng,et al.  A unification of the elastic network model and the Gaussian network model for optimal description of protein conformational motions and fluctuations. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[86]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Large amplitude conformational change in proteins explored with a plastic network model: adenylate kinase. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[87]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface , 2006, Bioinform..

[88]  C. Brooks,et al.  Symmetry, form, and shape: guiding principles for robustness in macromolecular machines. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[89]  T. Oas,et al.  A statistical thermodynamic model of the protein ensemble. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[90]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory , 2001, Proteins.

[91]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coupling between catalytic site and collective dynamics: a requirement for mechanochemical activity of enzymes. , 2005, Structure.

[92]  P. Krüger,et al.  Targeted molecular dynamics: a new approach for searching pathways of conformational transitions. , 1994, Journal of molecular graphics.