Lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast have distinct genomic and expression profiles

Invasive ductal carcinomas (IDCs) and invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) are the two major pathological types of breast cancer. Epidemiological and histoclinical data suggest biological differences, but little is known about the molecular alterations involved in ILCs. We undertook a comparative large-scale study by both array-compared genomic hybridization and cDNA microarray of a set of 50 breast tumors (21 classic ILCs and 29 IDCs) selected on homogeneous histoclinical criteria. Results were validated on independent tumor sets, as well as by quantitative RT–PCR. ILCs and IDCs presented differences at both the genomic and expression levels with ILCs being less rearranged and heterogeneous than IDCs. Supervised analysis defined a 75-BACs signature discriminating accurately ILCs from IDCs. Expression profiles identified two subgroups of ILCs: typical ILCs (∼50%), which were homogeneous and displayed a normal-like molecular pattern, and atypical ILCs, more heterogeneous with features intermediate between ILCs and IDCs. Supervised analysis identified a 75-gene expression signature that discriminated ILCs from IDCs, with many genes involved in cell adhesion, motility, apoptosis, protein folding, extracellular matrix and protein phosphorylation. Although ILCs and IDCs share common alterations, our data show that ILCs and IDCs could be distinguished on the basis of their genomic and expression profiles suggesting that they evolve along distinct genetic pathways.

[1]  J. Lamovec,et al.  Metastatic pattern of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: An autopsy study , 1991, Journal of surgical oncology.

[2]  M. Vijver,et al.  E‐cadherin is a tumour/invasion suppressor gene mutated in human lobular breast cancers. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[3]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: Clinicopathologic analysis of 975 cases with reference to data on conservative therapy and metastatic patterns , 1996, Cancer.

[4]  H. Joensuu,et al.  Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast has better short- and long-term survival than invasive ductal carcinoma. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  B. Dutrillaux,et al.  Highly recurrent der(1;16)(q10;p10) and other 16q arm alterations in lobular breast cancer , 1998, Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer.

[6]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P J Drew,et al.  Genetic changes in breast cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridisation , 2000, International journal of cancer.

[8]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Stefan Handt,et al.  Differences in genetic alterations between primary lobular and ductal breast cancers detected by comparative genomic hybridization , 2001, The Journal of pathology.

[10]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Jane Fridlyand,et al.  Differentiation of lobular versus ductal breast carcinomas by expression microarray analysis. , 2003, Cancer research.

[12]  B. Anderson,et al.  Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma. , 2003, JAMA.

[13]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  David Botstein,et al.  Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[15]  Barbara J. Trask,et al.  Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Genomic Alterations in Breast Cancer Subtypes , 2004, Cancer Research.

[16]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  Identification and validation of an ERBB2 gene expression signature in breast cancers , 2004, Oncogene.

[17]  Daniel Birnbaum,et al.  Protein expression profiling identifies subclasses of breast cancer and predicts prognosis. , 2005, Cancer research.

[18]  Roland Eils,et al.  High-Resolution Genomic Profiling Reveals Association of Chromosomal Aberrations on 1q and 16p with Histologic and Genetic Subgroups of Invasive Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[19]  G. Turashvili,et al.  Novel markers for differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas by laser microdissection and microarray analysis , 2007, BMC Cancer.

[20]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  Novel patterns of genome rearrangement and their association with survival in breast cancer. , 2006, Genome research.

[21]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Breast tumor copy number aberration phenotypes and genomic instability , 2006, BMC Cancer.

[22]  F. Bertucci,et al.  Gene expression profiling and clinical outcome in breast cancer. , 2006, Omics : a journal of integrative biology.

[23]  C. Nguyen,et al.  Genetic profiling of chromosome 1 in breast cancer: mapping of regions of gains and losses and identification of candidate genes on 1q , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[24]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Primary systemic chemotherapy of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.