Surface composition and orientation interact to affect subtidal epibiota.

Settlement panels were used to evaluate the effects of composition of the substratum (sandstone, concrete, wood) and orientation (vertical, horizontal undersides) on subtidal epibiota. It was predicted that both factors would influence the development of epibiotic assemblages, but that differences due to composition would be less marked on horizontal undersides compared to vertical panels. Differences in assemblages among sandstone, concrete and wooden panels orientated vertically were predicted to be similar to those described previously among vertical surfaces of sandstone rocky reefs and concrete and wooden urban structures (pilings and pontoons). Multivariate analyses indicated that assemblages were influenced greatly by orientation, whereas the effects of surface composition differed for the two orientations and among sites. Assemblages on wood were always significantly different from those on sandstone or concrete - patterns between the latter two surfaces depended on the orientation of the panels. The taxa that dominated these surfaces were not similar in identity nor abundance to those on urban structures of the same composition. The covers of most taxa were influenced by orientation alone or by surface composition for just one orientation. This study demonstrates the need for caution in generalizing about effects of orientation and surface composition because they may interact with each other and/or with other factors and they are certainly quite different for different taxa and among sites.

[1]  M. Keough,et al.  Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to bioorganic films : effects of large-scale variation in films , 1996 .

[2]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Differences Between Subtidal Epibiota on Pier Pilings and Rocky Reefs at Marinas in Sydney, Australia , 1999 .

[3]  P. Raimondi.  Rock type affects settlement, recruitment, and zonation of the barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma Pilsbury , 1988 .

[4]  T. Glasby.  Estimating spatial variability in developing assemblages of epibiota on subtidal hard substrata , 1998 .

[5]  M. Keough.  Effects of Patch Size on the Abundance of Sessile Marine Invertebrates , 1984 .

[6]  R. Osman,et al.  Potential role of micropredators in determining recruitment into a marine community , 1992 .

[7]  S. Kennelly,et al.  Effects of kelp canopies on understorey species due to shade and scour , 1989 .

[8]  M. Keough,et al.  Behavioural variability in marine larvae , 1990 .

[9]  R. F. Dolah,et al.  Community structure of the sessile biota on five artificial reefs of different ages , 1989 .

[10]  J. Ryland,et al.  Influence of Filming and of Surface Texture on the Settlement of Marine Organisms , 1960, Nature.

[11]  K. McGuinness.  Effects of some natural and artificial substrata on sessile marine organisms at Galeta Reef, Panama. , 1989 .

[12]  B. Wisely.  Factors Influencing the Settling of the Principal Marine Fouling Organisms in Sydney Harbour , 1959 .

[13]  C. H. Thorp,et al.  STUDIES ON THE SHALLOW, SUBLITTORAL EPIBENTHOS OF LANGSTONE HARBOUR, HAMPSHIRE, USING SETTLEMENT PANELS , 1977 .

[14]  M. Keough.  Dynamics of the Epifauna of the Bivalve Pinna Bicolor: Interactions Among Recruitment, Predation, and Competition , 1984 .

[15]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Statistical Design And Analysis For A Biological Effects Study , 1988 .

[16]  J. Jackson.  Competition on Marine Hard Substrata: The Adaptive Significance of Solitary and Colonial Strategies , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[17]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia , 1999 .

[18]  R. Karlson.  Predation and space utilization patterns in a marine epifaunal community , 1978 .

[19]  T. Glasby.  Interactive effects of shading and proximity to the seafloor on the development of subtidal epibiotic assemblages , 1999 .

[20]  D. Wethey,et al.  Settlement and early post-settlement survival of sessile marine invertebrates on topographically complex surfaces: the importance of refuge dimensions and adult morphology , 1996 .

[21]  J. Fuller.  Season of Attachment and Growth of Sedentary Marine Organisms at Lamoine, Maine , 1946 .

[22]  G. Box.  NON-NORMALITY AND TESTS ON VARIANCES , 1953 .

[23]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Techniques of analysis of variance in experimental marine biology and ecology , 1981 .

[24]  G. Daigle,et al.  Scales of substratum heterogeneity, structural complexity, and the early establishment of a marine epibenthic community☆ , 1994 .

[25]  C. J. Hurlbut.  Larval substratum selection and postsettlement mortality as determinants of the distribution of two bryozoans , 1991 .

[26]  C. Pomerat,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TEXTURE AND COMPOSITION OF SURFACE ON THE ATTACHMENT OF SEDENTARY MARINE ORGANISMS , 1946 .

[27]  S. Connell.  Effects of surface orientation on the cover of epibiota , 1999 .

[28]  T. Baynes.  Factors structuring a subtidal encrusting community in the Southern Gulf of California , 1999 .

[29]  R. Osman.  The Establishment and Development of a Marine Epifaunal Community , 1977 .

[30]  A. Butler,et al.  The role of asteroid predators in the organization of a sessile community on pier pilings , 1979 .

[31]  R. Purchon,et al.  The Ecology of the Lough INE Rapids with Special Reference to Water Currents , 1948 .

[32]  J. I. Campbell,et al.  Habitat Selection by Aquatic Invertebrates , 1972 .

[33]  R. Connolly,et al.  Assemblages of sessile marine invertebrates: still changing after all these years? , 1999 .

[34]  M. Keough,et al.  Effects of settlement and post-settlement mortality on the distribution of the ascidian Trididemnum opacum , 1986 .

[35]  M. Keough.  Responses of settling invertebrate larvae to the presence of established recruits , 1998 .

[36]  K. Irons,et al.  Substrate angle and predation as determinants in fouling community succession , 1982 .

[37]  Wayne P. Sousa,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS OF DISTURBANCE AND ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION IN A ROCKY INTERTIDAL ALGAL COMMUNITY , 1979 .

[38]  Connell,et al.  Floating pontoons create novel habitats for subtidal epibiota. , 2000, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[39]  T. Glasby.  Effects of shading on subtidal epibiotic assemblages , 1999 .

[40]  Influence of colour of substratum on recruitment of spirorbid tubeworms to different types of intertidal boulders , 1994 .

[41]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Predation by fish on assemblages of intertidal epibiota: effects of predator size and patch size , 1999 .

[42]  E. Bourget,et al.  Substratum heterogeneity and complexity influence micro-habitat selection of Balanus sp. and Tubularia crocea larvae , 1996 .

[43]  M. Keough,et al.  Larval settlement in hard substratum epifaunal assemblages: a manipulative field study of the effects of substratum filming and the presence of incumbents , 1994 .

[44]  M. Foster,et al.  The Effects of Canopy Shadings on Algal Recruitment and Growth in a Giant Kelp Forest , 1984 .

[45]  C. Pomerat,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SURFACE ANGLE AND OF LIGHT ON THE ATTACHMENT OF BARNACLES AND OTHER SEDENTARY ORGANISMS , 1942 .

[46]  B. Keegan,et al.  Biology of benthic organisms , 1977 .

[47]  Hugh M. Caffey,et al.  No effect of naturally-occurring rock types on settlement or survival in the intertidal barnacle, Tesseropora rosea (Krauss) , 1982 .

[48]  R. Connolly,et al.  Development and long term dynamics of a fouling assemblage of sessile marine invertebrates , 1996 .

[49]  S. Turner,et al.  Ecology of intertidal and sublittoral cryptic epifaunal assemblages. I. Experimental rationale and the analysis of larval settlement , 1986 .

[50]  C. Hurlbut.  The effects of larval abundance, settlement and juvenile mortality on the depth distribution of a colonial ascidian , 1991 .

[51]  A. Butler.  Effect of patchsize on communities of sessile invertebrates in Gulf St Vincent, South Australia , 1991 .

[52]  A. Butler.  Recruitment of sessile invertebrates at five sites in Gulf St. Vincent, South Australia , 1986 .

[53]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Effects of substratum on the recruitment and development of an intertidal estuarine fouling assemblage , 1994 .

[54]  W. R. Coe.  Season of attachment and rate of growth of sedentary marine organisms at the pier of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California , 1932 .

[55]  J. E. Eckman,et al.  Ecology of understory kelp environments. II, Effects of kelps on recruitment of benthic invertebrates , 1990 .

[56]  M. Harlin,et al.  Selection of substrata by seaweeds: Optimal surface relief , 1977 .