Daily prostate targeting using implanted radiopaque markers.

PURPOSE A system has been implemented for daily localization of the prostate through radiographic localization of implanted markers. This report summarizes an initial trial to establish the accuracy of patient setup via this system. METHODS AND MATERIALS Before radiotherapy, three radiopaque markers are implanted in the prostate periphery. Reference positions are established from CT data. Before treatment, orthogonal radiographs are acquired. Projected marker positions are extracted semiautomatically from the radiographs and aligned to the reference positions. Computer-controlled couch adjustment is performed, followed by acquisition of a second pair of radiographs to verify prostate position. Ten patients (6 prone, 4 supine) participated in a trial of daily positioning. RESULTS Three hundred seventy-four fractions were treated using this system. Treatment times were on the order of 30 minutes. Initial prostate position errors (sigma) ranged from 3.1 to 5.8 mm left-right, 4.0 to 10.1 mm anterior-posterior, and 2.6 to 9.0 mm inferior-superior in prone patients. Initial position was more reproducible in supine patients, with errors of 2.8 to 5.0 mm left-right, 1.9 to 3.0 mm anterior-posterior, and 2.6 to 5.3 mm inferior-superior. After prostate localization and adjustment, the position errors were reduced to 1.3 to 3.5 mm left-right, 1.7 to 4.2 mm anterior-posterior, and 1.6 to 4.0 mm inferior-superior in prone patients, and 1.2 to 1.8 mm left-right, 0.9 to 1.8 mm anterior-posterior, and 0.8 to 1.5 mm inferior-superior in supine patients. CONCLUSIONS Daily targeting of the prostate has been shown to be technically feasible. The implemented system provides the ability to significantly reduce treatment margins for most patients with cancer confined to the prostate. The differences in final position accuracy between prone and supine patients suggest variations in intratreatment prostate movement related to mechanisms of patient positioning.

[1]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  M. Anscher,et al.  The effect of pressure from the table top and patient position on pelvic organ location in patients with prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  L. Verhey,et al.  Computer-assisted positioning of radiotherapy patients using implanted radiopaque fiducials. , 1993, Medical physics.

[6]  K L Lam,et al.  A mathematical model for correcting patient setup errors using a tilt and roll device. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  K. Lam,et al.  Implementation of a System for Precision, Automated Daily Target Volume Positioning , 2000 .

[8]  J. Lewis,et al.  A computer-controlled conformal radiotherapy system. II: Sequence processor. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  K L Lam,et al.  A room-based diagnostic imaging system for measurement of patient setup. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  M Goitein,et al.  Proton radiation as boost therapy for localized prostatic carcinoma. , 1979, JAMA.

[12]  James M. Balter,et al.  Ventilatory movement of the prostate during radiotherapy , 2000 .

[13]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  G T Chen,et al.  Correlation of projection radiographs in radiation therapy using open curve segments and points. , 1992, Medical physics.

[15]  D L McShan,et al.  Automated determination of patient setup errors in radiation therapy using spherical radio-opaque markers. , 1993, Medical physics.

[16]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  G J Kutcher,et al.  The effect of treatment positioning on normal tissue dose in patients with prostate cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R. Zellars,et al.  Prostate position late in the course of external beam therapy: patterns and predictors. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Reinhard W. Schulte,et al.  Conformal proton therapy for prostate carcinoma. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  H M Sandler,et al.  Localization of the prostatic apex for radiation therapy using implanted markers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J M Balter,et al.  A comparison of ventilatory prostate movement in four treatment positions. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  K L Lam,et al.  Improvement of precision in spatial localization of radio-opaque markers using the two-film technique. , 1991, Medical physics.

[24]  D. Jones,et al.  A frameless method for stereotactic radiotherapy. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  K Lam,et al.  Measurement of prostate movement over the course of routine radiotherapy using implanted markers. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  Teh Bin S.,et al.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for localized prostate cancer preliminary results of acute toxicity compared to conventional and six-field conformal approach , 1998 .

[27]  D L McShan,et al.  A computer-controlled conformal radiotherapy system. I: Overview. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  P Hofman,et al.  Detection of fiducial gold markers for automatic on-line megavoltage position verification using a marker extraction kernel (MEK). , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[29]  D. Yan,et al.  Adaptive radiation therapy , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  J Szanto,et al.  Respiratory-induced prostate motion: quantification and characterization. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  L. Verhey,et al.  Defining treatment margins for six field conformal irradiation of localized prostate cancer. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.