Urban Water Management vs. Climate Change: Impacts on Cold Region Waste Water Inflows

Failure to account for non-climatic changes to water systems, such as design and operation, within climate change impact assessments leads to misconceptions because these activities buffer the human built enviroment from bio-physical impacts. Urban drainage in cold regions, which is dominated by snowmelt, is especially vulnerable to climate change and is investigated in this paper within the context of future rehabilitation of the sewer network. The objectives are to illustrate the relative response of urban drainage to changes in both the pipe network and climate and demonstrate the use of response surfaces for climate change studies. An incremental climate scenario approach is used to generate two sensitivity analyses for waste water inflows to the Lycksele waste water treatment plant in north-central Sweden. Air temperature and precipitation data (1984–1993) are altered incrementally between –5 and +15 °C and –10 and +40% respectively. These data are then used to drive a hydrological transformation model to obtain estimates of sewer infiltration from groundwater. The results are presented as winter and spring response surfaces – these are graphical representations of a response matrix where each point relates to a single model run. Climate scenario envelopes which summarise a series of GCM runs (ACACIA; Carter, 2002, pers. comm.) are overlaid to indicate the range of plausible waste water inflows. Estimates of natural multi-decadal variability are also included. The first sensitivity analysis assumes no change to the drainage system while the second simulates sewer renovation in which the system is fully separated and sewer infiltration is reduced. The main conclusions are that innovations in drainage network technology have a greater potential to alter waste water inflows than climate change and that, while the direction of climate change is fairly certain, there is great uncertainty surrounding magnitude of those changes and their impacts.

[1]  J. Hertin,et al.  Socio-economic futures in climate change impact assessment: using scenarios as ‘learning machines’ , 2002 .

[2]  M. Parry,et al.  Assessment of potential effects and adaptations for climate change in Europe : the Europe acacia project , 2000 .

[3]  A. Semadeni-Davies.  Representation of Snow in Urban Drainage Models , 2000 .

[4]  S. W. Hostetler,et al.  Hydrologic and atmospheric models: The (continuing) problem of discordant scales , 1994 .

[5]  A. Semadeni-Davies.  Snow heterogeneity in Luleå, Sweden , 1999 .

[6]  Diana Liverman,et al.  Climate and society in the US Southwest: the context for a regional assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Göran Westerström,et al.  Snowmelt runoff from Porsön residential area, Luleå, Sweden , 1984 .

[8]  H. Ahlmann,et al.  Snow Structure and Ski Fields , 1937 .

[9]  Roger Jones,et al.  Managing Uncertainty in Climate Change Projections – Issues for Impact Assessment , 2000 .

[10]  M. Hulme,et al.  Relative impacts of human-induced climate change and natural climate variability , 1999, Nature.

[11]  M. Rummukainen,et al.  Climate change impacts on runoff in Sweden assessments by global climate models, dynamical downscaling and hydrological modelling , 2001 .

[12]  M. Rummukainen,et al.  A regional climate model for northern Europe: model description and results from the downscaling of two GCM control simulations , 2001 .

[13]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  Urban snowmelt and runoff in northern Sweden , 1992 .

[14]  N. Arnell.  The effect of climate change on hydrological regimes in Europe: a continental perspective , 1999 .

[15]  N Apostolidis,et al.  A Simple Hydrologic Model for Sewer Inflow/Infiltration , 1992 .

[16]  J. Buttle,et al.  Snowmelt runoff in suburban environments , 1988 .

[17]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[18]  J. Alcamo,et al.  Deriving and Applying Response Surface Diagrams for Evaluating Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production , 2000 .

[19]  Peter Stahre,et al.  Stormwater: Best Management Practices and Detention for Water Quality, Drainage, and Cso Management , 1993 .

[20]  J. Boland.  Assessing Urban Water Use and the Role of Water Conservation Measures under Climate Uncertainty , 1997 .

[21]  M. Rummukainen,et al.  Modelling Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in the Swedish Regional Climate Modelling Programme , 2001 .

[22]  Martin L. Parry,et al.  Climate change: where should our research priorities be? , 2001 .

[23]  G. Bonan,et al.  An investigation of the sensitivity of a land surface model to climate change using a reduced form model , 2001 .

[24]  Richard N. Palmer,et al.  Water Resources Implications of Global Warming: A U.S. Regional Perspective , 1999 .

[25]  A. Fowler.  Potential climate change impacts on water resources in the Auckland Region (New Zealand) , 1999 .

[26]  Roger Jones,et al.  Climate scenario development , 2001 .

[27]  E. Källén,et al.  Climate change scenarios for the Nordic countries , 1995 .

[28]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The water balance of a sub‐Arctic town , 1999 .

[29]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  Radiation balance of urban snow: a water management perspective , 2001 .

[30]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Climate Change Impacts on Urban Flooding , 2000 .

[31]  R. Vogel,et al.  Global warming and the hydrologic cycle , 1996 .