Frequency of breast cancer attributable to BRCA1 in a population-based series of American women.

CONTEXT Previous studies of BRCA1 mutation prevalence have been based on high-risk groups, yielding estimates that do not reflect the experience of the general population of US patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE To determine prevalence of known disease-related mutations and other variants in BRCA1 and how it differs by race, age at diagnosis, and family history status in a population-based sample of white and black patients with breast cancer unselected for family history. DESIGN Case-control study. SETTING A 24-county area of central and eastern North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS Cases were women aged 20 to 74 years diagnosed as having a first invasive breast cancer between May 1993 and June 1996. Controls were frequency matched to cases by 5-year age range and race. The first 211 cases and 188 controls regardless of race and the subsequent 99 cases and 108 controls of African American ancestry are included in this report. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Germline variants at any site in the coding sequence, splice junctions, 5' untranslated region, or 3' untranslated region of the BRCA1 gene were analyzed in cases, and selected variants were analyzed in controls. Screening was performed using multiplex single-strand conformation analysis, with all potential variants confirmed using genomic sequencing. RESULTS Three of 211 patients with breast cancer had disease-related variants at BRCA1, all of which were protein-truncating mutations. After adjustment for sampling probabilities, the proportion of patients with breast cancer with disease-related variants was 3.3% (95% confidence interval, 0%-7.2%) in white women and 0% in black women. Young age at diagnosis alone did not predict BRCA1 carrier status in this population. In white women, prevalence of inherited mutation was 23% for cases with family history of ovarian cancer, 13% for cases from families with at least 4 cases of breast cancer with or without ovarian cancer, and 33% for cases from families with both breast and ovarian cancer and at least 4 affected relatives. Because these results are based on few families at the highest levels of risk, confidence intervals around these estimates are wide. An additional 5 patients had rare missense mutations or a single amino acid deletion, the biological significance of which is unknown. In black women, a variant in the 3' untranslated region was statistically significantly more common in cases than in controls. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that in the general US population, widespread screening of BRCA1 is not warranted. In contrast, BRCA1 mutations are sufficiently frequent in families with both breast and ovarian cancer, or at least 4 cases of breast cancer (at any age), that genotyping might be considered. The emerging picture of BRCA1 population genetics involves complex interactions of family history, age, and genetic ancestry, all of which should be taken into account when considering testing or interpreting results.

[1]  S. Rubin,et al.  Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. , 1995, JAMA.

[2]  G. Pals,et al.  A high proportion of novel mutations in BRCA1 with strong founder effects among Dutch and Belgian hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  A. Bowcock,et al.  Differential contributions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 to early-onset breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  K Offit,et al.  BRCA1 sequence analysis in women at high risk for susceptibility mutations. Risk factor analysis and implications for genetic testing. , 1997, JAMA.

[5]  G. Lenoir,et al.  Familial breast-ovarian cancer locus on chromosome 17q12-q23 , 1991, The Lancet.

[6]  G. Stamatoyannopoulos,et al.  Pitfalls of genetic testing. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  J. D. Thompson,et al.  Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in selected men with prostate cancer. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  D. Easton,et al.  Estimates of the gene frequency of BRCA1 and its contribution to breast and ovarian cancer incidence. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[9]  K. Johnson,et al.  Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial--an update. , 1997, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[10]  P. Tonin,et al.  Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families: are there more breast cancer-susceptibility genes? , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[11]  B Healy,et al.  BRCA genes--bookmaking, fortunetelling, and medical care. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Bernard J. Quinn Churches and church membership in the United States, 1980 : an enumeration by region, state, and county, based on data reported by 111 church bodies , 1982 .

[13]  F. Couch,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  C R Weinberg,et al.  Randomized recruitment in case-control studies. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  J. D. Thompson,et al.  BRCA1 mutations in a population-based sample of young women with breast cancer. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. , 1996, JAMA.

[17]  G. Lenoir,et al.  A 1-kb Alu-mediated germ-line deletion removing BRCA1 exon 17. , 1997, Cancer research.

[18]  C R Weinberg,et al.  The design and analysis of case-control studies with biased sampling. , 1990, Biometrics.

[19]  D. Easton,et al.  Genetic linkage analysis in familial breast and ovarian cancer: results from 214 families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  S. Cummings,et al.  Recurrent germ-line BRCA1 mutations in extended African American families with early-onset breast cancer. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[21]  M. King,et al.  Haplotype and phenotype analysis of nine recurrent BRCA2 mutations in 111 families: results of an international study. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  N Risch,et al.  Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  S. Fletcher,et al.  Whither scientific deliberation in health policy recommendations? Alice in the Wonderland of breast-cancer screening. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  F. Couch,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity in hereditary breast cancer: role of BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  A S Whittemore,et al.  Prevalence and contribution of BRCA1 mutations in breast cancer and ovarian cancer: results from three U.S. population-based case-control studies of ovarian cancer. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[26]  Patrick Dowd,et al.  Confirmation of BRCA1 by analysis of germline mutations linked to breast and ovarian cancer in ten families , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[27]  M. King,et al.  Novel inherited mutations and variable expressivity of BRCA1 alleles, including the founder mutation 185delAG in Ashkenazi Jewish families. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[28]  J. Ka,et al.  Tamoxifen Breast Cancer Prevention Trial--an update. , 1997 .

[29]  H. Mefford,et al.  BRCA2 in American families with four or more cases of breast or ovarian cancer: recurrent and novel mutations, variable expression, penetrance, and the possibility of families whose cancer is not attributable to BRCA1 or BRCA2. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[30]  M. King,et al.  Haplotype and phenotype analysis of six recurrent BRCA1 mutations in 61 families: results of an international study. , 1996, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  D. Easton,et al.  Genetic heterogeneity of breast-ovarian cancer revisited. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  F. Collins BRCA1--lots of mutations, lots of dilemmas. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  M. King,et al.  Linkage of early-onset familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21. , 1990, Science.

[34]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[35]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  A. Sachs,et al.  Messenger RNA degradation in eukaryotes , 1993, Cell.

[37]  K H Rothenberg,et al.  Genetic Information and Health Insurance: State Legislative Approaches , 1995, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[38]  Barbara L. Smith,et al.  Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in Jewish and non-Jewish women with early-onset breast cancer. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[39]  Peter Devilee,et al.  BRCA1 genomic deletions are major founder mutations in Dutch breast cancer patients , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[40]  M. King,et al.  Linkage of familial breast cancer to chromosome 17q21 may not be restricted to early-onset disease. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[41]  M. Skolnick,et al.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology : Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. Commentaries , 1996 .

[42]  D. Easton,et al.  Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers , 1994, The Lancet.

[43]  Troy Duster,et al.  Genetic Information and the Workplace: Legislative Approaches and Policy Challenges , 1997, Science.

[44]  M. Skolnick,et al.  Comparison of BRCA1 polymorphisms, rare sequence variants and/or missense mutations in unaffected and breast/ovarian cancer populations. , 1996, Human molecular genetics.

[45]  M. King,et al.  Inheritance of human breast cancer: evidence for autosomal dominant transmission in high-risk families. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.