Towards a broader perspective on the forms of eco-industrial networks

Abstract This paper explores various forms of eco-industrial networks in advancing environmental sustainability. Prior research on environmental sustainability primarily identifies industrial actors as autonomous entities or considers the role of networks in advancing environmental sustainability from a rather narrow perspective. However, the networks of ties in which industrial firms are embedded profoundly impacts not only their own performance, but also the natural environment in which they operate. Based on a systematic literature review, we identify four forms of eco-industrial networks that have the potential to advance environmental sustainability: 1) symbiosis networks, 2) sustainable supply networks, 3) environmental issue networks and 4) environmental solution networks. The paper presents important insights on the operational logic for each of these network forms and the dimensions of their network architecture. The main implications of this comparison are that policy-makers and practitioners need to become aware of the various mechanisms through which inter-organisational networks can reduce environmental load. Furthermore, there is a need to build broad coalitions of organisations that are mobilised to address environmental issues. We suggest that network architecture which maximises its members' capability to self-organise while also including a coordinating organisation can be highly suitable for eco-industrial networks. We also suggest some fruitful avenues for future research on eco-industrial networks. In integrating research on eco-industrial networks with existing research on inter-organisational alliances and networks, the paper provides more understanding on the multifaceted role played by various forms of eco-industrial networks in advancing sustainability.

[1]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[2]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  INTEGRATED CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND ILLUSTRATIVE CASES , 2004 .

[3]  Tareq Emtairah,et al.  Industrial symbiosis networks and the contribution to environmental innovation: The case of the Landskrona industrial symbiosis programme , 2005 .

[4]  J. Bi,et al.  The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China , 2006 .

[5]  M. Chertow “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis , 2007 .

[6]  P. Andersson,et al.  Towards a framework for ecological stategic change in business networks , 2002 .

[7]  T. Domenech,et al.  The role of Embeddedness in Industrial Symbiosis Networks: Phases in the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis Networks , 2011 .

[8]  Jennifer Howard-Grenville,et al.  Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network Orchestration , 2013 .

[9]  Øystein D. Fjeldstad,et al.  The architecture of collaboration , 2012 .

[10]  P. Laybourn,et al.  Redefining Industrial Symbiosis , 2012 .

[11]  Marian Chertow,et al.  INDUSTRIAL SYMBIOSIS: Literature and Taxonomy , 2000 .

[12]  W. Ashton Managing Performance Expectations of Industrial Symbiosis , 2011 .

[13]  Qinghua Zhu,et al.  Integrating green supply chain management into an embryonic eco-industrial development: a case study of the Guitang Group , 2004 .

[14]  J. Ehrenfeld,et al.  Organizing Self‐Organizing Systems , 2012 .

[15]  W. Ashton Understanding the Organization of Industrial Ecosystems , 2008 .

[16]  M. Tushman,et al.  Meta‐organization design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts , 2012 .

[17]  Leenard Baas,et al.  An industrial ecology project in practice: Exploring the boundaries of decision-making levels in regional industrial systems , 2004 .

[18]  Leenard Baas Planning and Uncovering Industrial Symbiosis: Comparing the Rotterdam and Östergötland regions , 2011 .

[19]  S. Mouzas,et al.  Learning to collaborate: a study of business networks , 2010 .

[20]  T. Tudor,et al.  Drivers and limitations for the successful development and functioning of EIPs (eco-industrial parks): A literature review , 2007 .

[21]  Leenard Baas,et al.  Critical success and limiting factors for eco-industrial parks: global trends and Egyptian context , 2011 .

[22]  D. Gibbs,et al.  Implementing industrial ecology? Planning for eco-industrial parks in the USA , 2005 .

[23]  Christopher Marquis,et al.  Imprinting: Toward A Multilevel Theory , 2013 .

[24]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments: The role of business uncertainty , 2007 .

[25]  T. Ritvala,et al.  Network mobilizers and target firms: The case of saving the Baltic Sea , 2011 .

[26]  B. Mcknight,et al.  Looking Forward, Pushing Back and Peering Sideways: Analyzing the Sustainability of Industrial Symbiosis , 2009 .

[27]  A. Swaminathan,et al.  Framing Interorganizational Network Change: A Network Inertia Perspective , 2006 .

[28]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  The Evolution of Facilitated Industrial Symbiosis , 2012 .

[29]  Nicola Morelli,et al.  Developing new product service systems (PSS): methodologies and operational tools , 2006 .

[30]  W. Ashton,et al.  Assessing the “Short Mental Distance” in Eco‐Industrial Networks , 2012 .

[31]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change , 2009 .

[32]  V. Anbumozhi,et al.  Techno policy aspects and socio-economic impacts of eco-industrial networking in the fishery sector: experiences from An Giang Province, Vietnam , 2009 .

[33]  Nani Pajunen,et al.  Governing the Interplay between Industrial Ecosystems and Environmental Regulation , 2012 .

[34]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[35]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[36]  Chunyuan Ma,et al.  Going beyond the sectoral boundary: a key stage in the development of a regional industrial ecosystem , 2012 .

[37]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[38]  Gian Luca Gregori,et al.  Network evolution and the embedding of complex technical solutions: The case of the Leaf House network , 2011 .

[39]  D. Tranfield,et al.  Using qualitative research synthesis to build an actionable knowledge base , 2006 .

[40]  Paulo Ferrão,et al.  A case study of industrial symbiosis development using a middle-out approach , 2010 .

[41]  Tiina Ritvala,et al.  Value-based network mobilization: A case study of modern environmental networkers , 2010 .

[42]  David L. Levy,et al.  Climate Change and the Emergence of New Organizational Landscapes , 2009 .

[43]  Jan-Åke Törnroos,et al.  Network process analysis: An event-based approach to study business network dynamics , 2013 .

[44]  Sangwon Suh,et al.  Evolution of 'designed' industrial symbiosis networks in the Ulsan Eco-industrial Park: 'research and development into business' as the enabling framework , 2012 .

[45]  S. L. Manring Creating and Managing Interorganizational Learning Networks To Achieve Sustainable Ecosystem Management , 2007 .

[46]  Alberto Simboli,et al.  Implementing eco-industrial parks in existing clusters. Findings from a historical Italian chemical site , 2012 .

[47]  Stephan Vachon,et al.  Supply chain management and environmental technologies: the role of integration , 2007 .

[48]  Fredrik von Malmborg Networking for knowledge transfer: towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management , 2004 .

[49]  David Gibbs,et al.  Reflections on implementing industrial ecology through eco-industrial park development , 2007 .

[50]  Teodoro Gallucci,et al.  Managerial factors for evaluating eco-clustering approach , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[51]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .