Short rotation plantations policy history in Europe: lessons from the past and recommendations for the future

Abstract Short rotation plantations (SRPs) are fast‐growing trees (such as willow (Salix spp.), poplar (Populus spp.) and Eucalyptus) grown closely together and harvested in periods of 2–20 years. There are around 50,000 hectares of SRPs in Europe, a relatively small area considering that there have been supportive policy measures in many countries for 30 years. This paper looks at the effect that the policy measures used in different EU countries have had, and how other external factors have impacted on the development of the industry. Rokwood was a 3‐year European funded project which attempted to understand the obstacles and barriers facing the woody energy crops sector using well established methods of SWOT and PESTLE analysis. Stakeholder groups were formed in six different European regions to analyze the market drivers and barriers for SRP and propose ways that the industry could make progress through targeted research and development and an improved policy framework. Based upon the outcomes of the SWOT and PESTLE analysis, each region produced a series of recommendations for policymakers, public authorities, and government agencies to support the development, production, and use of SRP‐derived wood fuel in each of the partner countries. This study provides details of the SRP policy analysis and reveals that each region shared a number of similarities with broad themes emerging. There is a need to educate farmers and policymakers about the multifunctional benefits of SRPs. Greater financial support from regional and/or national government is required in order to grow the SRP market. Introducing targeted subsidies as an incentive for growers could address lack of local supply chains. Long‐term policy initiatives should be developed while increasing clarity within Government departments. Research funding should enable closer working between universities and industry with positive research findings developed into supportive policy measures.

[1]  M. H. Jones,et al.  Comparative trials of elite Swedish and UK biomass willow varieties 2001-2010. , 2001 .

[2]  D. Szymańska,et al.  Endogenous resources utilization of rural areas in shaping sustainable development in Poland , 2011 .

[3]  Genevieve Patenaude,et al.  The economics of short rotation coppice in Germany , 2012 .

[4]  N. Boatman,et al.  Birds in willow short-rotation coppice compared to other arable crops in central England and a review of bird census data from energy crops in the UK , 2006 .

[5]  T. Verwijst,et al.  Development of Sustainable Willow Short Rotation Forestry in Northern Europe , 2013 .

[6]  T Wiesenthal,et al.  How much bioenergy can Europe produce without harming the environment , 2006 .

[7]  Dallemand Jean-Francois,et al.  Short Rotation Forestry, Short Rotation Coppice and Perennial Grasses in the European Union - Agro-environmental Aspects, Present Use and Perspectives , 2008 .

[8]  Georg von Wühlisch,et al.  Poplars and willows in Germany: Report of the National Poplar Commission 2012-2015 , 2016 .

[9]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  The effects of policy incentives in the adoption of willow short rotation coppice for bioenergy in Sweden , 2008 .

[10]  Dilys Williams,et al.  Promoting sustainable Indian textiles: final report to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), London, UK , 2010 .

[11]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Harvesting Short-Rotation Poplar Plantations for Biomass Production , 2008 .

[12]  Blas Mola-Yudego,et al.  Mapping the expansion and distribution of willow plantations for bioenergy in Sweden: Lessons to be learned about the spread of energy crops , 2010 .

[13]  R. Newman.  Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources , 2014 .

[14]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Evaluating ecosystem processes in willow short rotation coppice bioenergy plantations , 2013 .

[15]  Anders Roos,et al.  Retreat from Salix - Swedish experience with energy crops in the 1990s , 2006 .

[16]  J. Isebrands,et al.  Poplars and willows: trees for society and the environment. , 2014 .

[17]  J. Bocanegra,et al.  Biomass Yield Potential of Paulownia Trees in a , 2013 .

[18]  Andrew P. Whitmore,et al.  Miscanthus, short-rotation coppice and the historic environment , 2009 .

[19]  C. Heinzel,et al.  Tradable Green Certificates as a Policy Instrument? A Discussion on the Case of Poland , 2010 .

[20]  Patricia Thornley,et al.  The effectiveness of policy instruments in promoting bioenergy , 2008 .

[21]  C. Patrick Doncaster,et al.  Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment , 2011 .

[22]  Gero Becker,et al.  Harvesting of short rotation coppice - harvesting trials with a cut and storage system in Germany. , 2012 .

[23]  Hortensia Sixto,et al.  Biomass production assessment from Populus spp. short‐rotation irrigated crops in Spain , 2014 .

[24]  Nika Chitadze.  The Role of the OPEC in the International Energy Market , 2012 .

[25]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Dedicated biomass crops can enhance biodiversity in the arable landscape , 2015, Global change biology. Bioenergy.

[26]  Ian Shield,et al.  Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels. , 2011, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[27]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy, land use change and climate change mitigation. , 2011 .

[28]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Assessing Environmental Impacts of Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) Expansion: Model Definition and Preliminary Results , 2012, BioEnergy Research.

[29]  Terry Marsden,et al.  The Future of Rural Society , 1990 .

[30]  F. Andersson.  The Swedish 1990 Agricultural Reform - Adjustments of the Use of Land , 2005 .

[31]  Unfccc.  Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1997 .

[32]  Michael L. Ross.  How the 1973 Oil Embargo Saved the Planet , 2013 .

[33]  K. Lindegaard,et al.  Breeding willows for biomass. , 1997 .

[34]  Wilhelm Claupein,et al.  Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use - a review of the physiological basis and management influences. , 2003 .

[35]  Anders Roos,et al.  Willow growers in Sweden , 2000 .

[36]  Kevin Lindegaard,et al.  A critical appraisal of the effectiveness of UK perennial energy crops policy since 1990 , 2016 .

[37]  I. Zusammenfassung Vorblatt,et al.  Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz , 2015 .

[38]  J. Dauber,et al.  Climate regulation, energy provisioning and water purification: Quantifying ecosystem service delivery of bioenergy willow grown on riparian buffer zones using life cycle assessment , 2016, Ambio.

[39]  B. Dawson,et al.  UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE (UNFCCC) , 2008 .

[40]  S. Larsson,et al.  Genetic improvement of willow for short-rotation coppice , 1998 .

[41]  Rural Affairs.  UK Bioenergy Strategy. , 2012 .

[42]  G. Taylor,et al.  Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK , 2009 .

[43]  Paul Upham,et al.  Project ARBRE: Lessons for bio-energy developers and policy-makers , 2008 .

[44]  Alice Bows,et al.  Understanding Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems , 2013 .

[45]  Natascia Magagnotti,et al.  Using modified foragers to harvest short-rotation poplar plantations , 2009 .

[46]  C. Parra-López,et al.  Production and use of biomass from short-rotation plantations in Andalusia, southern Spain: limitations and opportunities , 2015 .

[47]  C. Mangan.  Overview of EU energy crop policy. , 1997 .

[48]  Stefan Frank,et al.  The land use change impact of biofuels consumed in the EU: Quantification of area and greenhouse gas impacts , 2015 .

[49]  Anders Blomquist.  Uppföljning av plantering på nedlagd åkermark i Skåne 1991-1996 , 2006 .

[50]  Kes McCormick,et al.  Exploring a pioneering bioenergy system: The case of Enköping in Sweden , 2005 .

[51]  Geoffrey P. Hammond,et al.  Barriers to and drivers for UK bioenergy development , 2011 .