θ-γ Cross-Frequency Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation over the Trough Impairs Cognitive Control

Abstract Cognitive control is a mental process, which underlies adaptive goal-directed decisions. Previous studies have linked cognitive control to electrophysiological fluctuations in the θ band and θ-γ cross-frequency coupling (CFC) arising from the cingulate and frontal cortices. However, to date, the behavioral consequences of different forms of θ-γ CFC remain elusive. Here, we studied the behavioral effects of the θ-γ CFC via transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) designed to stimulate the frontal and cingulate cortices in humans. Using a double-blind, randomized, repeated measures study design, 24 healthy participants were subjected to three active and one control CFC-tACS conditions. In the active conditions, 80-Hz γ tACS was coupled to 4-Hz θ tACS. Specifically, in two of the active conditions, short γ bursts were coupled to the delivered θ cycle to coincide with either its peaks or troughs. In the third active condition, the phase of a θ cycle modulated the amplitude of the γ oscillation. In the fourth, control protocol, 80-Hz tACS was continuously superimposed over the 4-Hz tACS, therefore lacking any phase specificity in the CFC. During the 20 min of stimulation, the participants performed a Go/NoGo monetary reward-based and punishment-based instrumental learning task. A Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression analysis revealed that relative to the control, the peak-coupled tACS had no effects on the behavioral performance, whereas the trough-coupled tACS and, to a lesser extent, amplitude-modulated tACS reduced performance in conflicting trials. Our results suggest that cognitive control depends on the phase specificity of the θ-γ CFC.

[1]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan , 2014 .

[2]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..

[3]  M. Frank,et al.  Instructional control of reinforcement learning: A behavioral and neurocomputational investigation , 2009, Brain Research.

[4]  P. Dayan,et al.  Action controls dopaminergic enhancement of reward representations , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Using Stacking to Average Bayesian Predictive Distributions (with Discussion) , 2017, Bayesian Analysis.

[6]  Matthias Mittner,et al.  Intermittent Absence of Control during Reinforcement Learning Interferes with Pavlovian Bias in Action Selection , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  W Paulus,et al.  Both the cutaneous sensation and phosphene perception are modulated in a frequency-specific manner during transcranial alternating current stimulation. , 2013, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .

[12]  S. Haber,et al.  The Organization of Prefrontal-Subthalamic Inputs in Primates Provides an Anatomical Substrate for Both Functional Specificity and Integration: Implications for Basal Ganglia Models and Deep Brain Stimulation , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults , 2019, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  G. Learmonth,et al.  The time course of ineffective sham‐blinding during low‐intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation , 2019, The European journal of neuroscience.

[16]  W. Paulus,et al.  Perturbation of theta-gamma coupling at the temporal lobe hinders verbal declarative memory , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  AIC model selection using Akaike weights , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  A neural microcircuit for cognitive conflict detection and signaling , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Sarah H. Lisanby,et al.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: Definition, selection, and reporting practices , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[20]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package , 2016, bioRxiv.

[21]  Ian W. Eisenberg,et al.  Frontal Theta Overrides Pavlovian Learning Biases , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  Jiqiang Guo,et al.  Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language. , 2017, Journal of statistical software.

[23]  Charles B. Mikell,et al.  Frequency-Dependent Representation of Reinforcement-Related Information in the Human Medial and Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[25]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[26]  N. Wenderoth,et al.  Concurrent tACS-fMRI Reveals Causal Influence of Power Synchronized Neural Activity on Resting State fMRI Connectivity , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Hold your horses: A dynamic computational role for the subthalamic nucleus in decision making , 2006, Neural Networks.

[28]  K. Amano,et al.  Illusory Jitter Perceived at the Frequency of Alpha Oscillations , 2017, Current Biology.

[29]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC , 2015, Statistics and Computing.

[30]  A. Antal,et al.  Modulation of Conflict Processing by Theta-Range tACS over the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2019, Neural plasticity.

[31]  Robert T Knight,et al.  Cognitive neurophysiology of the prefrontal cortex. , 2019, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[32]  P. Dayan,et al.  Action versus valence in decision making , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Spatial Working Memory in Humans Depends on Theta and High Gamma Synchronization in the Prefrontal Cortex , 2016, Current Biology.

[34]  Christoph S. Herrmann,et al.  Targeting alpha-band oscillations in a cortical model with amplitude-modulated high-frequency transcranial electric stimulation , 2018, NeuroImage.

[35]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Enhancement of multitasking performance and neural oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2017, PloS one.

[36]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.