Automatic NMO correction and velocity estimation by a feedforward neural network

We describe a new method of automatic normal moveout (NMO) correction and velocity analysis that combines a feedforward neural network (FNN) with a simulated annealing technique known as very fast simulated annealing (VFSA). The task of the FNN is to map common midpoint (CMP) gathers at control locations along a 2-D seismic line into seismic velocities within predefined velocity search limits. The network is trained while the velocity analysis is performed at the selected control locations. The method minimizes a cost function defined in terms of the NMO-corrected data. Network weights are updated at each iteration of the optimization process using VFSA. Once the control CMP gathers have been properly NMO corrected, the derived weights are used to interpolate results at the intermediate CMP locations. In practical situations in which lateral velocity variations are expected, the method is applied in spatial data windows, each window being defined by a separate FNN. The method is illustrated with synthetic data and a real marine data set from the Carolina Trough area.

[1]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Background velocity estimation using non‐linear optimization for reflection tomography and migration misfit , 1998 .

[2]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Neural networks for optimization and signal processing , 1993 .

[3]  W. M. Moon,et al.  Reservoir Characterization Using Feedforward Neural Networks , 1993 .

[4]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  The traveltime equation, tau‐p mapping, and inversion of common midpoint data , 1981 .

[5]  A. Balch,et al.  A dynamic programming approach to first arrival traveltime computation in media with arbitrarily distributed velocities , 1992 .

[6]  William A. Schneider,et al.  DEVELOPMENTS IN SEISMIC DATA PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS (1968–1970) , 1971 .

[7]  L. Ingber Very fast simulated re-annealing , 1989 .

[8]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Quantitative detection of methane hydrate through high-resolution seismic velocity analysis , 1994 .

[9]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  TRAVELTIME COMPUTATION IN TRANSVERSELY ISOTROPIC MEDIA , 1994 .

[10]  M. Al-Chalabi,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF STACKING, RMS, AVERAGE, AND INTERVAL VELOCITIES OVER A HORIZONTALLY LAYERED GROUND * , 1974 .

[11]  Mary M. Poulton,et al.  Location of subsurface targets in geophysical data using neural networks , 1992 .

[12]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion , 1995 .

[13]  Colin MacBeth,et al.  Split shear-wave analysis using an artificial neural network ? , 1994 .

[14]  Paul L. Stoffa,et al.  Traveltime computation in transverse isotropic media , 1993 .

[15]  P. Schultz,et al.  A method for direct estimation of interval velocities , 1982 .

[16]  Michael E. Murat,et al.  AUTOMATED FIRST ARRIVAL PICKING: A NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH1 , 1992 .

[17]  E. E. Cook,et al.  LIMITATIONS OF THE REFLECTION SEISMIC METHOD; LESSONS FROM COMPUTER SIMULATIONS , 1970 .

[18]  Sven Treitel,et al.  Plane‐wave decomposition of seismograms , 1982 .

[19]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation , 1985 .

[20]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  A Combined Genetic And Linear Inversion Algorithm For Seismic Waveform Inversion , 1993 .