Application and extension of the TOPSIS method for the assessment of floating offshore wind turbine support structures

The offshore wind industry is shifting its focus towards deeper water sites, more suited to floating rather than bottom fixed support structures. Floating support structures currently used for oil and gas platforms provide a starting point for the floating wind industry; however, the selection of an optimum structure is not trivial with several unique factors that contribute to its complexity. In this work programme, a methodology to rapidly assess several concepts for wind turbine floating support structures is proposed. Using the multi-criteria decision-making method, TOPSIS, configurations are rated for a range of attributes. In addition, two complementary methodologies have been developed that extend the TOPSIS capability by including an estimated impact of the uncertainties associated with each of the selected criteria, on the final choice of an optimum support structure. This methodology represents a robust yet flexible design tool to complement the early conceptual design process that is able to rapidly investigate a broad design space and narrow down the number of potential options suitable for floating wind turbines.

[1]  E. Stanley Lee,et al.  An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making , 2007, Math. Comput. Model..

[2]  Geir Moe,et al.  Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America , 2009 .

[3]  Feargal Brennan,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures , 2011 .

[4]  Kwangsun Yoon,et al.  Systems selection by multiple attribute decision making , 1982 .

[5]  Maurizio Collu,et al.  A comparison between the preliminary design studies of a fixed and a floating support structure for a 5 MW offshore wind turbine in the north sea , 2010 .

[6]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[7]  S. Butterfield,et al.  Future for Offshore Wind Energy in the United States: Preprint , 2004 .

[8]  James Franklin Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of Offshore Structures , 1984 .

[9]  Subrata K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Handbook of Offshore Engineering , 2005 .

[10]  Maurizio Collu,et al.  A multi-criteria decision making method to compare support structures for offshore wind turbines , 2010 .

[11]  Ben C. Gerwick,et al.  Construction of Marine and Offshore Structures , 2007 .

[12]  Stuart Pugh,et al.  Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering , 1991 .

[13]  Hsuan-Shih Lee,et al.  Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making , 2007, Comput. Math. Appl..

[14]  Liselotte Schleisner,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a wind farm and related externalities , 2000 .

[15]  C. Hwang.  Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[16]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[18]  E. Rowland.  Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.