Different coupling modes mediate cortical cross-frequency interactions

Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) has been suggested to constitute a highly flexible mechanism for cortical information gating and processing, giving rise to conscious perception and various higher cognitive functions in humans. In particular, it might provide an elegant tool for information integration across several spatiotemporal scales within nested or coupled neuronal networks. However, it is currently unknown whether low-frequency (theta/alpha) or high-frequency gamma oscillations orchestrate cross-frequency interactions, raising the question of who is master and who is slave. While correlative evidence suggested that at least two distinct CFC modes exist, namely, phase-amplitude-coupling (PAC) and amplitude-envelope correlations (AEC), it is currently unknown whether they subserve distinct cortical functions. Novel non-invasive brain stimulation tools, such as transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), now provide the unique opportunity to selectively entrain the low- or high-frequency component and study subsequent effects on CFC. Here, we demonstrate the differential modulation of CFC during selective entrainment of alpha or gamma oscillations. Our results reveal that entrainment of the low-frequency component increased PAC, where gamma power became preferentially locked to the trough of the alpha oscillation, while gamma-band entrainment enhanced AECs and reduced alpha power. These results provide causal evidence for the functional role of coupled alpha and gamma oscillations for visual processing.

[1]  Adriano B. L. Tort,et al.  Theta–gamma coupling increases during the learning of item–context associations , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Understanding the behavioural consequences of noninvasive brain stimulation , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  The effect of 10 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on corticomuscular coherence , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  Debora Brignani,et al.  Is Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Effective in Modulating Brain Oscillations? , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  Toralf Neuling,et al.  Friends, not foes: Magnetoencephalography as a tool to uncover brain dynamics during transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[7]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation in neurological diseases , 2013, Neuropharmacology.

[8]  Paul Tiesinga,et al.  Oscillatory mechanisms of feedforward and feedback visual processing , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Flavio Fröhlich,et al.  Rational design of transcranial current stimulation (TCS) through mechanistic insights into cortical network dynamics , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[11]  J. Fell,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Carsten H. Wolters,et al.  Good vibrations: Oscillatory phase shapes perception , 2012, NeuroImage.

[13]  Flavio Frohlich,et al.  EEG feedback-controlled transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2013, 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER).

[14]  C. Schroeder,et al.  The Gamma Oscillation: Master or Slave? , 2009, Brain Topography.

[15]  I. Nelken,et al.  Transient Induced Gamma-Band Response in EEG as a Manifestation of Miniature Saccades , 2008, Neuron.

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  Shifts in Gamma Phase–Amplitude Coupling Frequency from Theta to Alpha Over Posterior Cortex During Visual Tasks , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Engel,et al.  Intrinsic Coupling Modes: Multiscale Interactions in Ongoing Brain Activity , 2013, Neuron.

[19]  A. Antal,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[20]  Bart Gips,et al.  Temporal coding organized by coupled alpha and gamma oscillations prioritize visual processing , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  P. Schyns,et al.  Entrainment of Perceptually Relevant Brain Oscillations by Non-Invasive Rhythmic Stimulation of the Human Brain , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[22]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[23]  A. Engel,et al.  Selective Modulation of Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity by HD-tACS Shapes Perception , 2014, PLoS biology.

[24]  M. Nitsche,et al.  The Importance of Timing in Segregated Theta Phase-Coupling for Cognitive Performance , 2012, Current Biology.

[25]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Orchestrating neuronal networks: sustained after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation depend upon brain states , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[26]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Visual areas exert feedforward and feedback influences through distinct frequency channels , 2014 .

[27]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Theta-Gamma Neural Code , 2013, Neuron.

[28]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) modulates cortical excitability as assessed by TMS-induced phosphene thresholds , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience , 2014 .

[30]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  A. Engel,et al.  Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation , 2014, Current Biology.

[32]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Dennis J. L. G. Schutter,et al.  Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  O. Jensen,et al.  Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Posterior Alpha Activity , 2008, PloS one.

[35]  A. Engel,et al.  Spectral fingerprints of large-scale neuronal interactions , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[36]  A. Engel,et al.  Antiphasic 40 Hz Oscillatory Current Stimulation Affects Bistable Motion Perception , 2013, Brain Topography.

[37]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[38]  D. Leopold,et al.  Layer-Specific Entrainment of Gamma-Band Neural Activity by the Alpha Rhythm in Monkey Visual Cortex , 2012, Current Biology.

[39]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Transcranial Electric Stimulation Entrains Cortical Neuronal Populations in Rats , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[42]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  Marcel van Gerven,et al.  Measuring directionality between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies , 2015, NeuroImage.

[44]  H. Kennedy,et al.  Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels , 2014, Neuron.

[45]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  C. van Vreeswijk,et al.  What Is the Neural Code , 2006 .

[47]  P. Fries A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.