Service user and staff acceptance of fetal ultrasound telemedicine

Objective We present qualitative findings from interviews with frontline clinicians and service users of a fetal telemedicine service. Methods Semi-structured interviews with clinical stakeholders and service users were conducted, undertaken as part of a service evaluation. Data collection was undertaken by different teams, using interview schedules aligned to independent evaluation aims. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. Results Sonographers reported four main challenges: delivering a shared consultation; the requirement to resist scanning intuitively; communications during the scan; and restricted room space. Notwithstanding, all clinicians reported that participating women were accepting of the technology. Service users reported few concerns. The main benefits of fetal telemedicine were identified as upskilled staff, increased access to specialist support and improved management of complex pregnancies. Convenience was identified as the main benefit by service users, including savings in time and money from not having to travel, take time off work, and arrange childcare. Conclusions Service users and clinical stakeholders were accepting of the service. Service users reported satisfaction with communications during the consultation and awareness that telemedicine had facilitated local access to clinical expertise. Whilst clinical stakeholders reported challenges, the iterative nature of the evaluation meant that concerns were discussed, responded to, and overcome as the pilot developed. Clinical stakeholders’ perception of benefits for service users encouraged their acceptance. Moreover, the evaluation established that fetal ultrasound telemedicine is a viable method to access expertise safely and remotely. It provided demonstrable evidence of a potential solution to some of the healthcare challenges facing rural hospitals.

[1]  E. Bidmead,et al.  Using Telemedicine in Practice: Implications for Workforce Development , 2018, International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care.

[2]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  R. Lau,et al.  Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) , 2016, Implementation Science.

[4]  J. Marcin,et al.  Organizational and Teamwork Factors of Tele-Intensive Care Units. , 2016, American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

[5]  R. Sanderman,et al.  Patient satisfaction with a teleradiology service in general practice , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[6]  E. Bidmead,et al.  ‘Teleswallowing’: a case study of remote swallowing assessment , 2015 .

[7]  E. Araújo Júnior,et al.  Trans-Pacific tele-ultrasound image transmission of fetal central nervous system structures , 2015, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[8]  Miguel López-Coronado,et al.  Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. , 2015, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[9]  Bridgette Wessels,et al.  Examining the use of telehealth in community nursing: identifying the factors affecting frontline staff acceptance and telehealth adoption. , 2015, Journal of advanced nursing.

[10]  Bassel Odeh,et al.  Implementing a telehealth service: nurses' perceptions and experiences. , 2014, British journal of nursing.

[11]  D. Swinglehurst,et al.  Rethinking resistance to ‘big IT’: a sociological study of why and when healthcare staff do not use nationally mandated information and communication technologies , 2014 .

[12]  Yoshitaka Fujimoto,et al.  Increased satisfaction of maternity hospital staff involved in fetal telediagnosis , 2014, Pediatrics International.

[13]  Nigel R Armfield,et al.  Telemedicine ‐ is the cart being put before the horse? , 2014, The Medical journal of Australia.

[14]  S. Larkins,et al.  A tele-oncology model replacing face-to-face specialist cancer care: perspectives of patients in North Queensland , 2014, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[15]  G. Mountain,et al.  Factors affecting front line staff acceptance of telehealth technologies: a mixed-method systematic review. , 2014, Journal of advanced nursing.

[16]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers , 2013 .

[17]  Jane Moeckli,et al.  Staff acceptance of a telemedicine intensive care unit program: a qualitative study. , 2013, Journal of critical care.

[18]  C. Salisbury,et al.  Roles and identities in transition: boundaries of work and inter-professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care. , 2013, Health & social care in the community.

[19]  Everett F Magann,et al.  Telemedicine in Obstetrics , 2013, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Hema Mistry,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Prenatal Detection for Congenital Heart Disease Using Telemedicine Screening , 2013, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  B. McCrossan,et al.  A fetal telecardiology service: patient preference and socio‐economic factors , 2012, Prenatal diagnosis.

[22]  Rosann Webb Collins,et al.  Telemedicine: Technology mediated service relationship, encounter, or something else? , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  D. Kuik,et al.  Interobserver agreement in detailed prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease by telemedicine using four‐dimensional ultrasound with spatiotemporal image correlation , 2012, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[24]  A. Ferreira,et al.  Tele-obstetric ultrasound: analysis of first-trimester ultrasound images transmitted in realtime , 2012, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[25]  B. McCrossan,et al.  Fetal diagnosis of congenital heart disease by telemedicine , 2011, Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[26]  Everett F Magann,et al.  The Use of Telemedicine in Obstetrics: A Review of the Literature , 2011, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[27]  Jonathan Karnon,et al.  A qualitative study of sustainability and vulnerability in Australian telehealth services. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[28]  Markku Timonen,et al.  The attitudes of multiprofessional teams to telehealth adoption in northern Finland health centres , 2009, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[29]  F. Chan Fetal tele-ultrasound and tele-therapy , 2007, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[30]  M. Morelle,et al.  Effects of residential distance to hospitals with neonatal surgery care on prenatal management and outcome of pregnancies with severe fetal malformations , 2007, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[31]  F Viñals,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease using four‐dimensional spatio‐temporal image correlation (STIC) telemedicine via an Internet link: a pilot study , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[32]  H. Ko,et al.  Screening fetal echocardiography by telemedicine: efficacy and community acceptance. , 2003, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[33]  F. Chan,et al.  Realtime fetal ultrasound by telemedicine in Queensland. A successful venture? , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[34]  N M Fisk,et al.  Fetal telemedicine: six month pilot of real‐time ultrasound and video consultation between the Isle of Wight and London , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.