Resolution Agile Remote Sensing for Detection of Hazardous Material Spills

Traffic carrying flammable, corrosive, poisonous, and radioactive materials continues to increase in proportion with the growth in their production and consumption. The sustained risk of accidental releases of such hazardous materials poses serious threats to public safety. Early detection of spills will potentially save lives, protect the environment, and thwart the need for expensive cleanup campaigns. Ground patrols and terrestrial sensing equipment cannot scale cost-effectively to cover the entire transportation network. Remote sensing with existing airborne and spaceborne platforms has the capacity to monitor vast areas regularly but often lacks the spatial resolution necessary for high accuracy detections. The emergence of unmanned aircraft systems with lightweight hyperspectral image sensors enables a resolution agile approach that can adapt both spatial and spectral resolutions in real time. Equipment operators can exploit such a capability to enhance the resolution of potential target materials detected within a larger field-of-view to verify their identification or to perform further inspections. However, the complexity of algorithms available to classify hyperspectral scenes limits the potential for real-time target detection to support rapid decision making. This research introduces and benchmarks the performance of a low-complexity method of hyperspectral image classification. The hybrid supervised–unsupervised technique approaches the performance of prevailing methods that are at least 30-fold more computationally complex.

[1]  Tsehaie Woldai,et al.  Multi- and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing: A review , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[2]  Denver Tolliver,et al.  Hyperspectral imaging utility for transportation systems , 2015, Smart Structures.

[3]  C. H. Edwards,et al.  Calculus and Analytic Geometry , 1982 .

[4]  A. de Juan,et al.  Multivariate image analysis: a review with applications , 2011 .

[5]  Saeid Homayouni,et al.  HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE ANALYSIS FOR MATERIAL MAPPING USING SPECTRAL MATCHING , 2004 .

[6]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[7]  Jean-Michel Muller,et al.  Elementary Functions: Algorithms and Implementation , 1997 .

[8]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Imagery Based on Partitional Clustering Techniques , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  P. Groves,et al.  Methodology For Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2004 .

[10]  Raymond F. Kokaly,et al.  A method for quantitative mapping of thick oil spills using imaging spectroscopy , 2010 .

[11]  Ralph Craft Crashes Involving Trucks Carrying Hazardous Materials , 2004 .

[12]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Hyperspectral image data analysis , 2002, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[13]  S. Hook,et al.  The ASTER spectral library version 2.0 , 2009 .

[15]  Qian Du,et al.  Low-Complexity Principal Component Analysis for Hyperspectral Image Compression , 2008, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[16]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Classification Methods For Remotely Sensed Data , 2016 .

[17]  N. S. Rebello,et al.  Supervised and Unsupervised Spectral Angle Classifiers , 2002 .

[18]  Omar Smadi,et al.  Imaging spectrometry and asphalt road surveys , 2008 .