Brief Announcement: Bayesian Auctions with Efficient Queries

Generating good revenue is one of the most important problems in Bayesian auction design, and many (approximately) optimal dominant-strategy incentive compatible (DSIC) Bayesian mechanisms have been constructed for various auction settings. However, most existing studies do not consider the complexity for the seller to carry out the mechanism. It is assumed that the seller knows “each single bit” of the distributions and is able to optimize perfectly based on the entire distributions. Unfortunately this is a strong assumption and may not hold in reality: for example, when the value distributions have exponentially large supports or do not have succinct representations. In this work we consider, for the first time, the query complexity of Bayesian mechanisms. We only allow the seller to have limited oracle accesses to the players’ value distributions, via quantile queries and value queries. For a large class of auction settings, we prove logarithmic lower-bounds for the query complexity for any DSIC Bayesian mechanism to be of any constant approximation to the optimal revenue. For single-item auctions and multi-item auctions with unit-demand or additive valuation functions, we prove tight upper-bounds via efficient query schemes, without requiring the distributions to be regular or have monotone hazard rate. Thus, in those auction settings the seller needs to access much less than the full distributions in order to achieve approximately optimal revenue. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of computation → Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design

[1]  Yang Cai,et al.  Optimal Multi-dimensional Mechanism Design: Reducing Revenue to Welfare Maximization , 2012, 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[2]  Richard Cole,et al.  The sample complexity of revenue maximization , 2014, STOC.

[3]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Making the Most of Your Samples , 2018, SIAM J. Comput..

[4]  Amir Ronen,et al.  On approximating optimal auctions , 2001, EC '01.

[5]  Yang Cai,et al.  Learning Multi-Item Auctions with (or without) Samples , 2017, 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).

[6]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Matroid prophet inequalities , 2012, STOC '12.

[7]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  A Duality-Based Unified Approach to Bayesian Mechanism Design , 2019, SIAM J. Comput..

[8]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  An n-to-1 Bidder Reduction for Multi-item Auctions and its Applications , 2014, SODA.

[9]  Richard P. McLean,et al.  FULL EXTRACTION OF THE SURPLUS IN BAYESIAN AND DOMINANT STRATEGY AUCTIONS , 1988 .

[10]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[11]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Optimal and Efficient Parametric Auctions , 2013, SODA.

[12]  Yang Cai,et al.  An algorithmic characterization of multi-dimensional mechanisms , 2011, STOC '12.

[13]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  The sample complexity of auctions with side information , 2015, STOC.

[14]  Bo Li,et al.  From Bayesian to Crowdsourced Bayesian Auctions , 2017, ArXiv.

[15]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Learning Simple Auctions , 2016, COLT.

[16]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Ironing in the Dark , 2015, EC.

[17]  Jason D. Hartline Bayesian Mechanism Design , 2013, Found. Trends Theor. Comput. Sci..

[18]  Shuchi Chawla,et al.  Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing , 2010, BQGT.