A New Method to Evaluate Surface Defects with an Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducer

Characterizing a surface defect is very crucial in non-destructive testing (NDT). We employ an electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) to detect the surface defect of a nonmagnetic material. An appropriate feature that can avoid the interference of the human factor is vital for evaluating the crack quantitatively. Moreover, it can also reduce the influence of other factors, such as the lift-off, during the testing. In this paper, we conduct experiments at various depths of surface cracks in an aluminum plate, and a new feature, lift-off slope (LOS), is put forward for the theoretical and experimental analyses of the lift-off effect on the receiving signals. Besides, by changing the lift-off between the receiving probe and the sample for testing, a new method is adopted to evaluate surface defects with the EMAT. Compared with other features, the theoretical and experimental results show that the feature lift-off slope has many advantages prior to the other features for evaluating the surface defect with the EMAT. This can reduce the lift-off effect of one probe. Meanwhile, it is not essential to measure the signal without defects.

[1]  S Dixon,et al.  Lift-off compensation for improved accuracy in ultrasonic lamb wave velocity measurements using electromagnetic acoustic transducers (EMATs). , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[2]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  Characterisation of defects in the railhead using ultrasonic surface waves , 2006 .

[3]  Gui Yun Tian,et al.  An approach to reduce lift-off noise in pulsed eddy current nondestructive technology , 2014 .

[4]  R.B. Thompson,et al.  A Model for the Electromagnetic Generation and Detection of Rayleigh and Lamb Waves , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[5]  Kang Zhang,et al.  Influence of the Lift-Off Effect on the Cut-Off Frequency of the EMAT-Generated Rayleigh Wave Signal , 2014, Sensors.

[6]  Edoardo Mazza,et al.  Ultrasonic sizing of short surface cracks. , 2007, Ultrasonics.

[7]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  Coupling mechanism of electromagnetic acoustical transducers for ultrasonic generation , 2006 .

[8]  Xinjun Wu,et al.  Research on the lift-off effect of generating longitudinal guided waves in pipes based on magnetostrictive effect , 2012 .

[9]  Krishnan Balasubramaniam,et al.  Improving the signal amplitude of meandering coil EMATs by using ribbon soft magnetic flux concentrators (MFC). , 2011, Ultrasonics.

[10]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  Signal enhancement of the in-plane and out-of-plane Rayleigh wave components , 2005 .

[11]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Experimental and numerical evaluation of electromagnetic acoustic transducer performance on steel materials , 2012 .

[12]  V. A. Komarov,et al.  Direct electrodynamic electromagnetic-acoustic transformation in a normal polarizing field: I. Dependence on the gap according to the spectral theory , 2007 .

[13]  T. Shiotani,et al.  Repair evaluation of concrete cracks using surface and through-transmission wave measurements , 2007 .

[14]  P. Nagy,et al.  The impact of magnetostriction on the transduction of normal bias field EMATs , 2012 .

[15]  M. H. Rosli,et al.  In-plane and out-of-plane measurements of Rayleigh waves using EMATs for characterising surface cracks , 2012 .

[16]  Ningqun Guo,et al.  Rayleigh wave interaction with surface-breaking cracks , 2007 .

[17]  R. Edwards,et al.  Depth gauging of defects using low frequency wideband Rayleigh waves. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[18]  Rachel S. Edwards,et al.  ULTRASONIC RAYLEIGH WAVE ENHANCEMENTS FROM ANGLED DEFECTS IN ALUMINIUM , 2011 .

[19]  Steve Dixon,et al.  A new electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) design for operation on rail , 2014 .