Estimating the Potential Gains from Mergers

We introduce simple production economic models to estimate the potential gains from mergers. We decompose the gains into technical efficiency, size (scale) and harmony (mix) gains, and we discuss alternative ways to capture these gains. We propose to approximate the production processes using the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach, and we use the resulting operational approach to estimate the potential gains from merging agricultural extension offices in Denmark.

[1]  Dominique Deprins,et al.  Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices , 2006 .

[2]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Horizontal Mergers: An Equilibrium Analysis , 1988 .

[3]  Wolfgang Eichhorn,et al.  Measurement in economics : theory and applications of economic indices , 1988 .

[4]  Stephen J. Schmidt,et al.  DO MERGERS IMPROVE EFFICIENCY? EVIDENCE FROM DEREGULATED RAIL FREIGHT , 1999 .

[5]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Aggregation and Efficiency , 1988 .

[6]  Allen N. Berger,et al.  The Effects of Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit Function , 1997 .

[7]  Børge Obel,et al.  Allocative efficiency of technically inefficient production units , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Incentive efficient production frontiers: an agency perspective on DEA , 1994 .

[9]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  On FDH efficiency analysis: Some methodological issues and applications to retail banking, courts, and urban transit , 1993 .

[10]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[11]  Chiang Kao,et al.  Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement , 1992 .

[12]  Robert H. Porter,et al.  Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger , 1985 .

[13]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA-based yardstick competition: The optimality of best practice regulation , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  R. Bartels,et al.  The Effect of Sample Size on the Mean Efficiency in DEA with an Application to Electricity Distribution in Australia, Sweden and New Zealand , 1998 .

[15]  F. Førsund,et al.  Generalised Farrell Measures of Efficiency: An Application to Milk Processing in Swedish Dairy Plants , 1979 .

[16]  William W. Cooper,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATION: MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION MAKING UNITS , 1979 .

[17]  J. Tirole.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1988 .

[18]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA and Activity Planning under Asymmetric Information , 2000 .

[19]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Incentives and productivity measurements , 1995 .

[20]  A. Lewin,et al.  Measuring the relative efficiency and output potential of public sector organizations: An application of data envelopment analysis , 1981 .

[21]  T. Nilssen,et al.  Sequential horizontal mergers , 1998 .

[22]  N. Petersen.  Data Envelopment Analysis on a Relaxed Set of Assumptions , 1990 .

[23]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[24]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  DEA on relaxed convexity assumptions , 1996 .

[25]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Emissions Trading and Profitability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry , 1998 .

[26]  R. RajivD.BANKE.  Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis , 2003 .

[27]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[28]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .