Plasma and Electromagnetic Simulations of Meteor Head Echo Radar Reflections

Recently, meteor head echo detections from high powered large aperture radars (HPLA) have brought new measurements to bear on the study of sporadic interplanetary meteors. These same observations have demonstrated an ability to observe smaller meteoroids without some of the geometrical restrictions of specular radar techniques. Yet incorporating data from various radar reflection types and from different radars into a single consistent model has proven challenging. We believe this arises due to poorly understood radio scattering characteristics of the meteor plasma, especially in light of recent work showing that plasma turbulence and instability greatly influences meteor trail properties at every stage of evolution. In order to overcome some of the unknown relationships between meteoroid characteristics (such as mass and velocity) and the resulting head echo radar cross-sections (RCS), we present our results on meteor plasma simulations of head echo plasmas using particle in cell (PIC) ions, which show that electric fields strongly influence early stage meteor plasma evolution, by accelerating ions away from the meteoroid body at speeds as large as several kilometers per second. We also present the results of finite difference time domain electromagnetic simulations (FDTD), which can calculate the radar cross-section of the simulated meteor plasma electron distributions. These simulations have shown that the radar cross-section depends in a complex manner on a number of parameters. In this paper we demonstrate that for a given head echo plasma the RCS as a function of radar frequency peaks at sqrt (2*peak plasma frequency) and then decays linearly on a dB scale with increasing radar frequency. We also demonstrate that for a fixed radar frequency, the RCS increases linearly on a dB scale with increasing head echo plasma frequency. These simulations and resulting characterization of the head echo radar cross-section will both help relate HPLA radar observations to meteoroid properties and aid in determining a particular radar facility’s ability to observe various meteoroid populations.

[1]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[2]  H. Skullerud,et al.  Diffusion and interaction potentials for K+ ions in the noble gases , 1999 .

[3]  W. Jones.  Theory of the initial radius of meteor trains , 1995 .

[4]  M. Oppenheim,et al.  The anomalous diffusion of meteor trails , 2001 .

[5]  K. G. Budden.  The propagation of radio waves , 1985 .

[6]  Takuji Nakamura,et al.  Implications of meteor observations by the MU Radar , 2001 .

[7]  D. Meisel,et al.  Micrometeor Observations Using the Arecibo 430 MHz Radar: I. Determination of the Ballistic Parameter from Measured Doppler Velocity and Deceleration Results , 2000 .

[8]  Lars P. Dyrud,et al.  Electrodynamics of meteor trail evolution in the equatorial E‐region ionosphere , 2000 .

[9]  K. Denney,et al.  Modelling high-power large-aperture radar meteor trails , 2005 .

[10]  A. Taylor,et al.  The Harvard Radio Meteor Project Meteor Velocity Distribution Reappraised , 1995 .

[11]  P. Colestock,et al.  Meteor head echo radar data: Mass-velocity selection effects , 2007 .

[12]  A. D. Boardman,et al.  Electromagnetic surface modes , 1982 .

[13]  D. Murphy,et al.  Ablation, Flux, and Atmospheric Implications of Meteors Inferred from Stratospheric Aerosol , 2001, Science.

[14]  H. Pécseli,et al.  Plasma and electromagnetic wave simulations of meteors , 2008 .

[15]  Jonathan T. Fentzke,et al.  A semi‐empirical model of the contribution from sporadic meteoroid sources on the meteor input function in the MLT observed at Arecibo , 2008 .

[16]  Sigrid Close,et al.  Interpretation of non‐specular radar meteor trails , 2001 .

[17]  D. Janches,et al.  A comparison of detection sensitivity between ALTAIR and Arecibo meteor observations: Can high power and large aperture radars detect low velocity meteor head-echoes , 2008 .

[18]  C. Birdsall,et al.  Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation , 2018 .

[19]  Sigrid Close,et al.  A technique for calculating meteor plasma density and meteoroid mass from radar head echo scattering , 2004 .

[20]  S. Franke,et al.  THE METEOR FLUX: IT DEPENDS HOW YOU LOOK , 2006 .

[21]  John D. Mathews,et al.  The micrometeoroid mass flux into the upper atmosphere: Arecibo results and a comparison with prior estimates , 2001 .

[22]  J. Plane.  A time-resolved model of the mesospheric Na layer: constraints on the meteor input function , 2004 .

[23]  K. Yee.  Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell's equations in isotropic media , 1966 .

[24]  M. A. Cervera,et al.  The meteor radar response function: Theory and application to narrow beam MST radar , 2004 .

[25]  Douglas O. ReVelle,et al.  Meteor Phenomena and Bodies , 1998 .

[26]  L.J. Nickisch,et al.  Finite-difference time-domain solution of Maxwell's equations for the dispersive ionosphere , 1992, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[27]  Sigrid Close,et al.  Scattering characteristics of high-resolution meteor head echoes detected at multiple frequencies , 2002 .

[28]  E. Chapin,et al.  Radar interferometric imaging studies of long‐duration meteor echoes observed at Jicamarca , 1994 .

[29]  Ronald F. Woodman,et al.  Modeling the global micrometeor input function in the upper atmosphere observed by high power and large aperture radars , 2006 .

[30]  A. Pellinen-Wannberg,et al.  The EISCAT meteor-head method – a review and recent observations , 2004 .