R E I E W A N D S Y N T H E S I S Global patterns of leaf mechanical properties

Leaf mechanical properties strongly influence leaf lifespan, plant–herbivore interactions, litter decomposition and nutrient cycling, but global patterns in their interspecific variation and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We synthesize data across the three major measurement methods, permitting the first global analyses of leaf mechanics and associated traits, for 2819 species from 90 sites worldwide. Key measures of leaf mechanical resistance varied c. 500–800-fold among species. Contrary to a long-standing hypothesis, tropical leaves were not mechanically more resistant than temperate leaves. Leaf mechanical resistance was modestly related to rainfall and local light environment. By partitioning leaf mechanical resistance into three different components we discovered that toughness per density contributed a surprisingly large fraction to variation in mechanical resistance, larger than the fractions contributed by lamina thickness and tissue density. Higher toughness per density was associated with long leaf lifespan especially in forest understory. Seldom appreciated in the past, toughness per density is a key factor in leaf mechanical resistance, which itself influences plant– animal interactions and ecosystem functions across the globe.

[1]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[2]  Kaoru Kitajima,et al.  Tissue-level leaf toughness, but not lamina thickness, predicts sapling leaf lifespan and shade tolerance of tropical tree species. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[3]  Y. Onoda,et al.  Reconciling species-level vs plastic responses of evergreen leaf structure to light gradients: shade leaves punch above their weight. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[4]  Yang-jian Zhang,et al.  Is there more insect folivory in warmer temperate climates? A latitudinal comparison of insect folivory in eastern North America , 2009 .

[5]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[6]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[7]  L. Williams.  THE FEEDING HABITS AND FOOD PREFERENCES OF ACRIDIDAE AND THE FACTORS WHICH DETERMINE THEM , 2009 .

[8]  J. Read,et al.  Correlations between leaf toughness and phenolics among species in contrasting environments of Australia and New Caledonia. , 2009, Annals of botany.

[9]  G. Mittelbach,et al.  Is There a Latitudinal Gradient in the Importance of Biotic Interactions , 2009 .

[10]  Campbell O. Webb,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Phylocom: Software for the Analysis of Phylogenetic Community Structure and Trait Evolution , 2022 .

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Why are evergreen leaves so contrary about shade? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  N. Dominy,et al.  In tropical lowland rain forests monocots have tougher leaves than dicots, and include a new kind of tough leaf. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[13]  Y. Onoda,et al.  Effects of light and nutrient availability on leaf mechanical properties of Plantago major: a conceptual approach. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[14]  J. Read,et al.  Leaf biomechanical properties and the densities of herbivorous insect guilds , 2007 .

[15]  F. Clissold.  The Biomechanics of Chewing and Plant Fracture: Mechanisms and Implications , 2007 .

[16]  Alexia Stokes,et al.  Plant biomechanics in an ecological context. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[17]  G. Sanson,et al.  The biomechanics of browsing and grazing. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[18]  M Henry H Stevens,et al.  The growth-defense trade-off and habitat specialization by plants in Amazonian forests. , 2006, Ecology.

[19]  M. Westoby,et al.  Bivariate line‐fitting methods for allometry , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[20]  P. Reich,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. , 2006, Ecology.

[21]  J. Read,et al.  Do tropical species invest more in anti-herbivore defence than temperate species? A test in Eucryphia (Cunoniaceae) in eastern Australia , 2005, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[22]  J. Read,et al.  Leaf Mechanical Properties in Sclerophyll Woodland and Shrubland on Contrasting Soils , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[23]  S. Pennings,et al.  LINKING BIOGEOGRAPHY AND COMMUNITY ECOLOGY: LATITUDINAL VARIATION IN PLANT–HERBIVORE INTERACTION STRENGTH , 2005 .

[24]  M. Woolford.  Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[25]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Photosynthesis or persistence: nitrogen allocation in leaves of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species , 2004 .

[26]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[27]  Tadaki Hirose,et al.  Allocation of nitrogen to cell walls decreases photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency , 2004 .

[28]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[29]  I. Terashima.  Anatomy of non-uniform leaf photosynthesis , 1992, Photosynthesis Research.

[30]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf lifespan as a determinant of leaf structure and function among 23 amazonian tree species , 1991, Oecologia.

[31]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Chemistry and toughness predict leaf litter decomposition rates over a wide spectrum of functional types and taxa in central Argentina , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[32]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Leaf traits and herbivore selection in the field and in cafeteria experiments , 2003 .

[33]  J. Read,et al.  Characterizing sclerophylly: the mechanical properties of a diverse range of leaf types. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[34]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[35]  P. Reich,et al.  Least‐Cost Input Mixtures of Water and Nitrogen for Photosynthesis , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[36]  S. Pennings,et al.  LATITUDINAL VARIATION IN PALATABILITY OF SALT-MARSH PLANTS: WHICH TRAITS ARE RESPONSIBLE? , 2002 .

[37]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[38]  M. Westoby,et al.  Leaves at low versus high rainfall: coordination of structure, lifespan and physiology. , 2002, The New phytologist.

[39]  K. Thompson,et al.  Leaf traits as indicators of resource-use strategy in floras with succulent species , 2002 .

[40]  Ian J. Wright,et al.  Relationships between leaf lifespan and structural defences in a low-nutrient, sclerophyll flora , 2001 .

[41]  V. Mosbrugger,et al.  Evolution and Function of Leaf Venation Architecture: A Review , 2001 .

[42]  Ülo Niinemets,et al.  GLOBAL-SCALE CLIMATIC CONTROLS OF LEAF DRY MASS PER AREA, DENSITY, AND THICKNESS IN TREES AND SHRUBS , 2001 .

[43]  J. Read,et al.  Characterising sclerophylly: some mechanical properties of leaves from heath and forest , 2000, Oecologia.

[44]  V. De Luca,et al.  The cell and developmental biology of alkaloid biosynthesis. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[45]  N. Aranwela,et al.  Methods of assessing leaf‐fracture properties , 1999 .

[46]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[47]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Is inherent variation in RGR determined by LAR at low irradiance and by NAR at high irradiance? A review of herbaceous species , 1998 .

[48]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Functional leaf attributes predict litter decomposition rate in herbaceous plants. , 1997, The New phytologist.

[50]  J. A. Barone,et al.  HERBIVORY AND PLANT DEFENSES IN TROPICAL FORESTS , 1996 .

[51]  M. F. Choong.  What makes a leaf tough and how this affects the pattern of Castanopsis fissa leaf consumption by caterpillars , 1996 .

[52]  J. Vincent,et al.  HERBIVORY AND THE MECHANICS OF FRACTURE IN PLANTS , 1996 .

[53]  Brian W. Darvell,et al.  A portable fracture toughness tester for biological materials , 1996 .

[54]  D. Henry,et al.  Measurement of the shear and tensile fracture properties of leaves of pasture grasses , 1996 .

[55]  W. Wright,et al.  A comparative study of the fracture properties of five grasses , 1995 .

[56]  I. Turner.  Sclerophylly: primarily protective? , 1994 .

[57]  P. V. Soest.  Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant , 1994 .

[58]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Methods in comparative plant ecology : a laboratory manual , 1993 .

[59]  P. Lucas,et al.  How Tough are Sclerophylls , 1993 .

[60]  P. Lucas,et al.  Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications , 1992 .

[61]  M. Pagel.  A method for the analysis of comparative data , 1992 .

[62]  P. Coley,et al.  Delayed greening in tropical leaves: an antiherbivore defense? , 1992 .

[63]  P. Lucas,et al.  The Fracture Toughness of the Leaf of the Dicotyledon Calophyllum inophyllum L. (Guttiferae) , 1991 .

[64]  O. Pellmyr.  Plant-Animal Interactions: Evolutionary Ecology in Tropical and Temperate Regions , 1991 .

[65]  P. Lucas,et al.  Estimation of the fracture toughness of leaves , 1990 .

[66]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective , 1988 .

[67]  J. Felsenstein.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[68]  A. Atkins,et al.  Elastic and Plastic Fracture: Metals, Polymers, Ceramics, Composites, Biological Materials , 1985 .

[69]  P. Coley,et al.  HERBIVORY AND DEFENSIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF TREE SPECIES IN A LOWLAND TROPICAL FOREST , 1983 .

[70]  David J. Hicks,et al.  The Ecology of Leaf Life Spans , 1982 .

[71]  Yiu-Wing Mai,et al.  On the guillotining of materials , 1979 .

[72]  T. Givnish.  On the Adaptive Significance of Leaf Form , 1979 .

[73]  D. Levin,et al.  The toxicity of plant alkaloids: an Ecogeographic perspective , 1978 .

[74]  D. Levin.  The Chemical Defenses of Plants to Pathogens and Herbivores , 1976 .

[75]  Robert H. Smith.  The analysis of intra-generation change in animal populations. , 1973 .

[76]  I. Hiscock.  Communities and Ecosystems , 1970, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[77]  P. Feeny.  SEASONAL CHANGES IN OAK LEAF TANNINS AND NUTRIENTS AS A CAUSE OF SPRING FEEDING BY WINTER MOTH CATERPILLARS , 1970 .

[78]  J. M. Cherrett.  A Simple Penetrometer for Measuring Leaf Toughness in Insect Feeding Studies , 1968 .

[79]  N. Beadle.  Soil Phosphate and Its Role in Molding Segments of the Australian Flora and Vegetation, with Special Reference to Xeromorphy and Sclerophylly , 1966 .

[80]  A. Loveless.  A Nutritional Interpretation of Sclerophylly Based on Differences in the Chemical Composition of Sclerophyllous and Mesophytic Leaves , 1961 .

[81]  R. Y..  Plant-Geography upon a Physiological Basis , 1904, Nature.