Short-Term Bone Healing Response to Mechanical Stimulation—A Case Series Conducted on Sheep

It is well known that mechanical stimulation promotes indirect fracture healing by triggering callus formation. We investigated the short-term response of healing tissue to mechanical stimulation to compare the changes in tissue stiffness during stimulation and resting phases in a preclinical case-series. Four sheep underwent a tibial osteotomy and were instrumented with a custom-made active fixator which applied a mechanical stimulation protocol of 1000 cycles/day, equally distributed over 12 h, followed by 12 h of rest. During each cycle, a surrogate metric for tissue stiffness was measured, enabling a continuous real-time monitoring of the healing progression. A daily stiffness increase during stimulation and an increase during resting were evaluated for each animal. One animal had to be excluded from the evaluation due to technical reasons. For all included animals, the stiffness began to increase within the second week post-op. A characteristic pattern was observed during daily measurements: the stiffness dropped considerably within the first stimulation cycles followed by a steady rise throughout the rest of the stimulation phase. However, for all included animals, the average daily stiffness increase within the first three weeks post operation was larger during resting than during stimulation (Sheep I: 16.9% vs. −5.7%; Sheep II: 14.7% vs. −1.8%; Sheep III: 8.9% vs. 1.6%). A continuous measurement of tissue stiffness together with a controlled fracture stimulation enabled the investigation of the short-term effects of specific stimulatory parameters, such as resting periods. Resting was identified as a potentially determining factor for bone healing progression. Optimizing the ratio between stimulation and resting may contribute to more robust fracture healing in the future.

[1]  S. Perren,et al.  Tissue deformation controlling fracture healing. , 2021, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  J. Barcik,et al.  Can Optimizing the Mechanical Environment Deliver a Clinically Significant Reduction in Fracture Healing Time? , 2021, Biomedicines.

[3]  Markus Windolf,et al.  Programable Active Fixator System for Systematic In Vivo Investigation of Bone Healing Processes , 2020, Sensors.

[4]  D. Arens,et al.  The relation between fracture activity and bone healing with special reference to the early healing phase - A preclinical study. , 2020, Injury.

[5]  P. Augat,et al.  The role of mechanical stimulation in the enhancement of bone healing. , 2020, Injury.

[6]  S. Perren,et al.  Mechanical Stimulation of Fracture Healing – Stimulation of Callus by Improved Recovery , 2019 .

[7]  M. Schuetz,et al.  Early mechanical stimulation only permits timely bone healing in sheep , 2018, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  L. Claes,et al.  Novel systems for the application of isolated tensile, compressive, and shearing stimulation of distraction callus tissue , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  C. Evans,et al.  A Concert between Biology and Biomechanics: The Influence of the Mechanical Environment on Bone Healing , 2017, Front. Physiol..

[10]  T. Kubo,et al.  A PTH-responsive circadian clock operates in ex vivo mouse femur fracture healing site , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[11]  H. Gong,et al.  Multi-Level Assessment of Fracture Calluses in Rats Subjected to Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration with Different Rest Periods , 2016, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  S. Perren,et al.  Fracture healing: fracture healing understood as the result of a fascinating cascade of physical and biological interactions. Part II. , 2015, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[13]  S. Perren,et al.  Fracture healing: fracture healing understood as the result of a fascinating cascade of physical and biological interactions. Part I. An Attempt to Integrate Observations from 30 Years AO Research. , 2014, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[14]  L. Claes,et al.  Late Dynamization by Reduced Fixation Stiffness Enhances Fracture Healing in a Rat Femoral Osteotomy Model , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[15]  L. Claes,et al.  Early dynamization by reduced fixation stiffness does not improve fracture healing in a rat femoral osteotomy model , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[16]  Timothy M. Wright,et al.  Pause Insertions During Cyclic In Vivo Loading Affect Bone Healing , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  P. Giannoudis,et al.  Fracture healing: the diamond concept. , 2007, Injury.

[18]  Georg N Duda,et al.  Instability prolongs the chondral phase during bone healing in sheep. , 2006, Bone.

[19]  E Schneider,et al.  Shear Does Not Necessarily Inhibit Bone Healing , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  S M Perren,et al.  The influence of cyclic compression and distraction on the healing of experimental tibial fractures , 2004, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  L. Claes,et al.  The fracture gap size influences the local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing , 2003, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[22]  L. Claes,et al.  Mechanical Stimulation by External Application of Cyclic Tensile Strains Does Not Effectively Enhance Bone Healing , 2001, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[23]  D Kaspar,et al.  Effects of Mechanical Factors on the Fracture Healing Process , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J Kenwright,et al.  The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[25]  J D Troup,et al.  Circadian variation in human stature. , 1984, Chronobiology international.

[26]  H. Uhthoff,et al.  Current concepts of internal fixation of fractures. , 1980, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.