Choledocolithiasis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Three-year experience.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the detection of common bile duct stones. A series of 286 consecutive patients were referred for MRCP, that was performed with a 1.5 T MR unit, through a non-breath-hold, respiratory-triggered, fat-suppressed, two-dimensional, heavily T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the coronal plane. Axial T1 and T2-weighted sequences were first obtained. Axial, coronal, and Maximum Intensity Projection images were evaluated by three independent readers, who were asked to determine whether stones were present or not inside the biliary tract. The findings of MRCP images were compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, percutaneous trans-hepatic cholangiography, intra-operative cholangiography, surgical, or imaging follow-up findings. Two-hundred and seventy-eight out of 286 MRCP examinations were judged diagnostic by the three reviewers. Among the 278 patients included in our study group, biliary tract lithiasis was proved in 76 cases (27%). On the basis of reviewers' reading, MRCP had sensitivity 92-93%, specificity 97-98%, positive predictive value 91-93%, negative predictive value 97-98%, and the diagnostic accuracy ranged between 95% and 96% in the detection of calculi. Interobserver agreement was excellent (K = 0.84, kappa statistic). MRCP showed a high diagnostic accuracy and an excellent inter-observer agreement in the detection of common bile duct stones.

[1]  P. Cooperberg,et al.  Accuracy of common hapatic duct size in the evaluation of extrahepatic biliary obstruction. , 1980, Radiology.

[2]  A. Barkun,et al.  Bile duct obstruction and choledocholithiasis: diagnosis with MR cholangiography. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  Baowei Dong,et al.  Improved sonographic visualization of choledocholithiasis , 1987, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[4]  J. Soto,et al.  MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  B. Ammori,et al.  Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 2000, Surgical Endoscopy.

[6]  R. Baron Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. , 1987, Radiology.

[7]  J. Fleiss Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[8]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[9]  H. V. Liddle,et al.  Commonbile-duct stones. , 1958, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  P Pavone,et al.  Magnetic resonance-cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic diseases. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[11]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[12]  M. Reiser,et al.  Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  F Regan,et al.  Choledocholithiasis: evaluation with MR cholangiography. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  F. Terrier,et al.  MR cholangiopancreatography: technique, potential indications, and diagnostic features of benign, postoperative, and malignant conditions , 1997, European Radiology.

[15]  B. Millat,et al.  Cholangio-pancréatographie rétrograde et sphinctérotomie endoscopique pour lithiase biliaire. Evaluation prospective en milieu chirurgical. , 1993 .

[16]  P. Doyle,et al.  The value of routine peroperative cholangiography—a report of 4000 cholecystectomies , 1982, British Journal of Surgery.

[17]  F. Terrier,et al.  Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. , 1997, Radiology.

[18]  M. Gagner,et al.  Routine operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: feasibility and value in 107 patients. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  P. Cotton Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography , 1973, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  P Pikkarainen,et al.  Ultrasonography, CT, and ERCP in the Diagnosis of Choledochal Stones , 1992, Acta radiologica.

[21]  Y Ishizaki,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography for evaluation of obstructive jaundice. , 1993, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[22]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  R Schöfl,et al.  Three-dimensional spiral CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[24]  M. Schnall,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography. , 1995, Gastroenterology clinics of North America.

[25]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Assessment of tumor vascularity in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of power Doppler US and color Doppler US. , 1996, Radiology.

[26]  D. Zimmon,et al.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Analysis of 300 consecutive cases. , 1975, Gastroenterology.

[27]  Chung‐Chieng Wu,et al.  Effect of aging on common bile duct diameter: A real‐time ultrasonographic study , 1984, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[28]  J. Soto,et al.  MR cholangiopancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. , 1996, Radiology.

[29]  R W Günther,et al.  Computed tomographic cholangiography using spiral scanning and 3D image processing. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[30]  J. Sung,et al.  Choledocholithiasis: comparison of MR cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. , 1996, Radiology.

[31]  C. Dotter,et al.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A study of 10,000 cases. , 1976, Gastroenterology.

[32]  B. Kiefer,et al.  Cholangiography before biliary surgery: single-shot MR cholangiography versus intravenous cholangiography. , 1996, Radiology.