Robotic palpation-based mechanical property mapping for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to estimate the mechanical properties (elasticity) of normal and cancer prostate tissues and to develop a tissue elasticity map for the diagnosis and localization of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 735 sites from 35 radical prostatectomy specimens were used in the experiments using a robotic palpation system, and the elasticities of the specimens were estimated by a tissue characterization algorithm. The estimated elasticities from 21 regions were separated into normal and cancer tissues using the pathological information, and a tissue elasticity map was developed using numerical functions and a nonlinear surface-fitting method. RESULTS The mean elastic moduli of the normal and cancer tissues were 15.25 ± 5.88 and 28.80 ± 11.20 kPa, respectively. The base region had the highest elasticity, followed by the medial and apex regions. These results demonstrated the ability to separate the cancer tissue from the normal tissue based on its elastic modulus. The tissue elasticity mapping was carried out using the estimated elasticity and nonlinear surface fitting. The proposed map showed the elasticity and was used to estimate the elastic modulus of the prostate at any given region. CONCLUSION Tissue elasticity may be an important indicator of prostate cancer because the pathologic changes alter the tissue properties, including cell integrity and intercellular matrix. This work provides quantitative and objective information for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In addition, these results may have implications for the localization of prostate cancers.

[1]  O. Yossepowitch.  Digital rectal examination remains an important screening tool for prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.

[2]  Chronic Disease Division.  Cancer facts and figures , 2010 .

[3]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  Enzo Pasquale Scilingo,et al.  Haptic display for replication of rheological behaviour of surgical tissues: modelling, control, and experiments , 1997 .

[5]  L. Borden,et al.  An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men , 2007, BJU international.

[6]  Alessandro Nava,et al.  In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Jung Kim,et al.  Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  J Drago,et al.  The American cancer society national prostate cancer detection project. Findings on the detection of early prostate cancer in 2425 men , 1991, Cancer.

[9]  R. V. D. van den Bergh,et al.  Digital rectal examination and the diagnosis of prostate cancer--a study based on 8 years and three screenings within the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. , 2009, European urology.

[10]  W. Catalona,et al.  Digital rectal examination for detecting prostate cancer at prostate specific antigen levels of 4 ng./ml. or less. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[11]  P. Dario,et al.  An advanced robot system for automated diagnostic tasks through palpation , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  W. Catalona,et al.  Interexaminer variability of digital rectal examination in detecting prostate cancer. , 1995, Urology.

[13]  M. Brawer,et al.  Editorial: Prostate Cancer Detection , 1994 .

[14]  Edoardo Mazza,et al.  Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  W. Catalona,et al.  Longitudinal screening for prostate cancer with prostate-specific antigen. , 1996, JAMA.

[16]  F. Schröder,et al.  The TNM classification of prostate cancer , 1992, The Prostate. Supplement.

[17]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2008 , 2008, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[18]  J. Eastham,et al.  Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL. , 2005, Urology.

[19]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  A sensor-based minimally invasive surgery tool for detecting tissutal elastic properties(003) 5323219 , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  A. Gliozzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of single living cells encapsulated in polyelectrolyte matrixes. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[21]  M. Roobol,et al.  Screening for prostate cancer at low PSA range: The impact of digital rectal examination on tumor incidence and tumor characteristics , 2007, The Prostate.

[22]  B. Ahn,et al.  Mechanical property characterization of prostate cancer using a minimally motorized indenter in an ex vivo indentation experiment. , 2010, Urology.