Evaluation of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III algorithm for selecting candidates for statin therapy: insights from the A to Z trial.

[1]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins , 2005, The Lancet.

[2]  A. Khera,et al.  Race and gender differences in C-reactive protein levels. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: phase Z of the A to Z trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[4]  V. Hasselblad,et al.  Safety and efficacy of enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who receive tirofiban and aspirin: a randomized controlled trial. , 2004, JAMA.

[5]  P. Ridker.  Rosuvastatin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease among patients with low levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein: rationale and design of the JUPITER trial. , 2003, Circulation.

[6]  C. Cogbill,et al.  Preventing myocardial infarction in the young adult in the first place: how do the National Cholesterol Education Panel III guidelines perform? , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Califf,et al.  The A-to-Z Trial: Methods and rationale for a single trial investigating combined use of low-molecular-weight heparin with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban and defining the efficacy of early aggressive simvastatin therapy. , 2001, American heart journal.