Exploring potential R&D collaboration partners through patent analysis based on bibliographic coupling and latent semantic analysis

The aim of the present research is to provide a new systematic methodology to explore potential Research and Development (R&D) collaboration partners using patent information. The potential R&D collaboration partners are visualised as a patent assignee level map based on technological similarity between patents by using the network analysis. The proposed framework utilises two analytic methods to measure technological similarity. The first method, bibliographic coupling analysis, measures technological similarity based on the citation relationship using patent bibliographic information. Second, latent semantic analysis is utilised based on semantic similarity using patent textual information. The fuel cell membrane electrode assembly technology field is selected and applied to illustrate the proposed methodology. The proposed approach allows firms, universities, research institutes and governments to identify potential R&D collaborators as a systematic decision-making support tool.

[1]  Yoke San Wong,et al.  A two-stage manufacturing partner selection framework for virtual enterprises , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[2]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Gerard Salton,et al.  The SMART Retrieval System—Experiments in Automatic Document Processing , 1971 .

[4]  J. C. F. D. Arroyabe,et al.  The choice of partners in R&D cooperation: An empirical analysis of Spanish firms , 2008 .

[5]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Erich J. Neuhold,et al.  Information and communication technology , 2007, 2007 International Forum on Strategic Technology.

[7]  Gary G. Yen,et al.  Time line visualization of research fronts , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection , 2007 .

[9]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[10]  Ying Ding,et al.  Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Ming-Yeu Wang,et al.  Exploring potential R&D collaborators with complementary technologies: The case of biosensors , 2012 .

[12]  Fr¬¥ed¬¥erique Sachwald,et al.  Co-operative R&D: why and with whom?: An integrated framework of analysis , 2003 .

[13]  Lars Hakanson.  R&D based cooperative ventures , 1991 .

[14]  Hong Tau Lee,et al.  An analytic hierarchy process approach with linguistic variables for selection of an R&D strategic alliance partner , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology-pharmaceutical sector? , 2003 .

[16]  Don R. Swanson,et al.  Some Unexplained Aspects of the Cranfield Tests of Indexing Performance Factors , 1971, The Library Quarterly.

[17]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis: II: Dynamical aspects , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Darrell Laham,et al.  From paragraph to graph: Latent semantic analysis for information visualization , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Gaston Heimeriks,et al.  Mapping research topics using word-reference co-occurrences: A method and an exploratory case study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[20]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Finding Related Pages in the World Wide Web , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[21]  S. T. Dumais,et al.  Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information , 1988, CHI '88.

[22]  Gin-Shuh Liang,et al.  Using fuzzy MCDM to select partners of strategic alliances for liner shipping , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[23]  R. Raeside,et al.  Choosing successful technology development partners: a best-practice model , 1998 .

[24]  Xin Liu,et al.  Creating generic text summaries , 2001, Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.

[25]  A. Amida,et al.  Fuzzy multiobjective linear model for supplier selection in a supply chain , 2015 .

[26]  M. Hitt,et al.  Alliance Management as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 2002 .

[27]  Daniel Gatica-Perez,et al.  On image auto-annotation with latent space models , 2003, ACM Multimedia.

[28]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[29]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Statistical semantics: analysis of the potential performance of keyword information systems , 1984 .

[30]  Julie Bichteler,et al.  The combined use of bibliographic coupling and cocitation for document retrieval , 1980, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[31]  M. M. Kessler.  Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers , 1963 .

[32]  A. Saxenian.  The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a Global Economy , 1994 .

[33]  Wann-Yih Wu,et al.  The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[34]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[35]  S. T. Dumais,et al.  Human factors and behavioral science: Statistical semantics: Analysis of the potential performance of key-word information systems , 1983, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[36]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Creating new technology through alliances: An empirical investigation of joint patents , 2007 .

[37]  Ingo Feinerer.  Introduction to the tm Package Text Mining in R , 2007 .

[38]  Takao Fujiwara,et al.  Real options analysis on strategic partnerships of biotechnological start-ups , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[39]  Cornelia Dröge,et al.  Collaborating for new product development: Selecting the partner with maximum potential to create value , 2006 .

[40]  R. Ramanna,et al.  Cooperation in research and development , 1977 .

[41]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[42]  Luigi Benfratello,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and Firm Level Performance , 2000 .

[43]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[44]  Sheu Hua Chen,et al.  Applying ANP approach to partner selection for strategic alliance , 2008 .

[45]  Hendrik Jähn,et al.  Optimizing the selection of partners in production networks , 2004 .

[46]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Using LSI for information filtering: TREC-3 experiments , 1995 .

[47]  Helen Atkins.  The ISI® Web of Science® - Links and Electronic Journals: How links work today in the Web of Science, and the challenges posed by electronic journals , 1999, D Lib Mag..

[48]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[49]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  The Cranfield II Relevance Assessments: A Critical Evaluation , 1971, The Library Quarterly.

[50]  J. Leker,et al.  Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists , 2011 .

[51]  Ellen H.M. Moors,et al.  Beyond Regional Clusters: On the Importance of Geographical Proximity for R&D Collaborations in a Global Economy—the Case of the Flemish Biotech Sector , 2012 .

[52]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[53]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? , 2010 .

[54]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  MU-HSUAN HUANG,et al.  Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: A study of Taiwan's high-tech companies , 2003, Scientometrics.

[56]  Monika Henzinger,et al.  Hyperlink Analysis for the Web , 2001, IEEE Internet Comput..

[57]  T. Das,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2000 .

[58]  Yongtae Park,et al.  How to Use Patent Information to Search Potential Technology Partners in Open Innovation , 2011 .

[59]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[60]  Sylvia B. Encheva,et al.  Partner Selection for Interfirm Collaboration in Ship Design , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[61]  Roger B. Bradford.  Efficient Discovery of New Information in Large Text Databases , 2005, ISI.

[62]  Kotawara Savitha.  Personalized Information Delivery: An Analysis Of Information Filtering Methods , 2014 .

[63]  Natarajan Balasubramanian,et al.  NBER Patent Data-BR Bridge: User Guide and Technical Documentation , 2010 .

[64]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  A better way to innovate. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[65]  Ángeles Montoro-Sánchez,et al.  Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations , 2004 .

[66]  Andreas C. Georgiou,et al.  A goal programming model for partner selection decisions in international joint ventures , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Timothy J. Wilkinson,et al.  Strategic alliances: Choose your partners , 1995 .

[68]  Byungun Yoon,et al.  A systematic approach of partner selection for open innovation , 2014, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[69]  Olle Persson,et al.  The Intellectual Base and Research Fronts of JASIS 1986-1990 , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[70]  Marina Z. Solesvik,et al.  Partner Selection for Strategic Alliances: Case Study Insights from the Maritime Industry , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[71]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[72]  B. Nielsen.  An Empirical Investigation of the Drivers of International Strategic Alliance Formation , 2003 .

[73]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[74]  Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al.  Identifying missing relevant patent citation links by using bibliographic coupling in LED illuminating technology , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[75]  Dar-Zen Chen,et al.  The bibliographic coupling approach to filter the cited and uncited patent citations: a case of electric vehicle technology , 2012, Scientometrics.

[76]  Cyril Cleverdon,et al.  The Cranfield tests on index language devices , 1997 .

[77]  Bo Jarneving,et al.  Bibliographic coupling and its application to research-front and other core documents , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[78]  Stephane Lhuillery,et al.  R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data , 2009 .

[79]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[80]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  Partner Selection for Open Innovation , 2013 .

[81]  Ruimin Ma,et al.  Author bibliographic coupling analysis: A test based on a Chinese academic database , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[82]  C. Vedovello.  Science parks and university-industry interaction: Geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force , 1997 .

[83]  A. Salter,et al.  Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration , 2009 .

[84]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Implementing technology roadmapping with supplier selection for semiconductor manufacturing companies , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[85]  Jerker Moodysson,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration and Proximity , 2007 .

[86]  Masao Nakamura,et al.  Research alliances and collaborations: Introduction to the special issue , 2003 .

[87]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[88]  Sungjoo Lee,et al.  Identifying and evaluating strategic partners for collaborative R&D: Index-based approach using patents and publications , 2013 .

[89]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: A cognitive modeling perspective , 1995 .

[90]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  An enhanced ant colony optimiser for multi-attribute partner selection in virtual enterprises , 2012 .

[91]  Per Ahlgren,et al.  Bibliographic coupling, common abstract stems and clustering: A comparison of two document-document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping , 2008, Scientometrics.

[92]  Jeffrey Cummings,et al.  Building Successful Strategic Alliances: Strategic Process and Analytical Tool for Selecting Partner Industries and Firms , 2009 .

[93]  K. Frenken,et al.  Innovation, spillovers, and university-industry collaboration: An extended knowledge production function approach , 2010 .

[94]  Dale Littler,et al.  Success factors for collaborative product development: a study of suppliers of information and communication technology , 1995 .

[95]  Wenxing Zhu,et al.  Partner selection with a due date constraint in virtual enterprises , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[96]  Zhi-Ping Fan,et al.  A method for partner selection of codevelopment alliances using individual and collaborative utilities , 2010 .

[97]  P. Jeffrey,et al.  The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry–academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment , 2005 .

[98]  Sheng-Lin Chang,et al.  Applying fuzzy linguistic quantifier to select supply chain partners at different phases of product life cycle , 2006 .

[99]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. Structural aspects , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..