Paradigm Shift in the Holistic Evaluation of the Reliability of NDE Systems

Abstract The aim of this publication is to provide an overview of new methodologies for evaluating the reliability of NDE systems in accordance with the specific requirements of industrial applications. After a review of the substantive issues of the previous decades, the go forward guidance is concluded. For high safety demands a quantitative POD (Probability of Detection) created from hit/miss experiments or signal response analysis and ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) are typically created. The modular reliability model distinguishes between the pure physical-technical influence, industrial application factors, and human factors. It helps to learn which factors can be determined by modeling and by open or blind trials. A new paradigm is offered to consider the POD or reliability of the system as a function of the configuration of input variables and is used for optimization rather than for a final judgement. New approaches are considered dealing with real defects in a realistic environment, affordable but precisely like the Bayesian approach or model assisted methods. Among the influencing parameters, human factors are of high importance. A systematic psychological approach helps to find out where the bottlenecks are and shows possibilities for improvement.

[1]  J. Cronin,et al.  Summary of the workshop , 1992 .

[2]  Eric A. Lindgren,et al.  Recent Advances in Model-Assisted Probability of Detection , 2009 .

[3]  Daniel Kanzler,et al.  Bayesian Approach for the Evaluation of the Reliability of Non-Destructive Testing Methods: Combination of Data from Artificial and Real Defects , 2012 .

[4]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[5]  Christina Müller,et al.  Investigating human factors in manual ultrasonic testing: testing the human factors model , 2011 .

[6]  Johan Enkvist A human factors perspective on non-destructive testing (NDT) : detection and identification of cracks , 2003 .

[7]  F. Ammirato,et al.  Reliability II Development of POD and Flaw Sizing Uncertainty Distributions from NDE Qualification Data to Support Probabilistic Structural Integrity Assessment for Dissimilar Metal Welds , 2012 .

[8]  Babette FAHLBRUCH,et al.  Integrating Human Factors in Safety and Reliability Approaches , 2009 .

[9]  C. Nockemann,et al.  Reliability in NDT: ROC study of radiographic weld inspections , 1991 .

[10]  K. Mosier,et al.  Human Decision Makers and Automated Decision Aids: Made for Each Other? , 1996 .

[11]  John C. Aldrin,et al.  CASE STUDIES FOR MODEL‐ASSISTED PROBABILISTIC RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEMS , 2011 .

[12]  S. Karau,et al.  Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Multi-Parameter Influence on the Response of the Flaw to the Phased Array Ultrasonic NDT System , 2009 .

[14]  Daniel Kanzler,et al.  Human Factors Approach to the Acquisition and Evaluation of NDT Data , 2012 .