Sloppy, But Acceptable, Control of Biological Movement: Algorithm-Based Stabilization of Subspaces in Abundant Spaces

Abstract In this paper, we develop an algorithm-based approach to the problem of stability of salient performance variables during motor actions. This problem is reformulated as stabilizing subspaces within high-dimensional spaces of elemental variables. Our main idea is that the central nervous system does not solve such problems precisely, but uses simple rules that achieve success with sufficiently high probability. Such rules can be applied even if the central nervous system has no knowledge of the mapping between small changes in elemental variables and changes in performance. We start with a rule ”Act on the most nimble” (the AMN-rule), when changes in the local feedback-based loops occur for the most unstable variable first. This rule is implemented in a task-specific coordinate system that facilitates local control. Further, we develop and supplement the AMN-rule to improve the success rate. Predictions of implementation of such algorithms are compared with the results of experiments performed on the human hand with both visual and mechanical perturbations. We conclude that physical, including neural, processes associated with everyday motor actions can be adequately represented with a set of simple algorithms leading to sloppy, but satisfactory, solutions. Finally, we discuss implications of this scheme for motor learning and motor disorders.

[1]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  Stability of Kinesthetic Perception in Efferent-Afferent Spaces: The Concept of Iso-perceptual Manifold , 2017, Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Gołaś,et al.  Neurofeedback for the enhancement of dynamic balance of judokas , 2017, Biology of sport.

[3]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Biological Movement and Laws of Physics. , 2017, Motor control.

[4]  M. L. Latash,et al.  Neural control of movement stability: Lessons from studies of neurological patients , 2015, Neuroscience.

[5]  Anatol G. Feldman,et al.  Referent control of action and perception: Challenging conventional theories in behavioral neuroscience , 2015 .

[6]  J. Cole,et al.  Proprioception in motor learning: lessons from a deafferented subject , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Motor equivalence during multi-finger accurate force production , 2014, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  V. Akulin Soluble Time-Dependent Systems , 2014 .

[9]  P. Celnik Understanding and Modulating Motor Learning with Cerebellar Stimulation , 2014, Cerebellum.

[10]  Gerald E. Loeb,et al.  Optimal isn’t good enough , 2012, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  Mark L. Latash,et al.  The bliss (not the problem) of motor abundance (not redundancy) , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  M. Latash,et al.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  V M Zatsiorsky,et al.  Stabilization of the total force in multi-finger pressing tasks studied with the 'inverse piano' technique. , 2011, Human movement science.

[14]  Mark L Latash,et al.  An analytical approach to the problem of inverse optimization with additive objective functions: an application to human prehension , 2010, Journal of mathematical biology.

[15]  Mark L Latash,et al.  Motor synergies and the equilibrium-point hypothesis. , 2010, Motor control.

[16]  R. Ivry,et al.  The coordination of movement: optimal feedback control and beyond , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  R. Rosenfeld Synergy , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[18]  M. Latash,et al.  Flexible muscle modes and synergies in challenging whole-body tasks , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  L. Ting,et al.  Muscle synergies characterizing human postural responses. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  M. Latash,et al.  Learning effects on muscle modes and multi-mode postural synergies , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Andrea d'Avella,et al.  Matrix factorization algorithms for the identification of muscle synergies: evaluation on simulated and experimental data sets. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Coordination of Locomotion with Voluntary Movements in Humans , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Lena H Ting,et al.  A limited set of muscle synergies for force control during a postural task. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Marc H Schieber,et al.  Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[25]  M. Latash,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons: identification of muscle modes , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[26]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  A mode hypothesis for finger interaction during multi-finger force-production tasks , 2003, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  S. Slobounov,et al.  Modulated cortical control of individual fingers in experienced musicians: an EEG study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Vladimir M Zatsiorsky,et al.  Optimization-Based Models of Muscle Coordination , 2002, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[31]  M. Latash,et al.  Enslaving effects in multi-finger force production , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  M L Latash,et al.  On the problem of adequate language in motor control. , 1998, Motor control.

[34]  M. Latash,et al.  Force sharing among fingers as a model of the redundancy problem , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  G. Schöner Recent Developments and Problems in Human Movement Science and Their Conceptual Implications , 1995 .

[36]  S. Gandevia,et al.  Limited independent flexion of the thumb and fingers in human subjects. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  R. Llinás,et al.  On the cerebellum and motor learning , 1993, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  C. Ghez,et al.  Loss of proprioception produces deficits in interjoint coordination. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  A. G. Feldman Once More on the Equilibrium-Point Hypothesis (λ Model) for Motor Control , 1986 .

[40]  M. Arbib Coordinated control programs for movements of the hand , 1985 .

[41]  J. Houk,et al.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[42]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .