Comparative Analysis of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Using Two Types of Artificial Cervical Discs: Bryan® versus Mobi-C®
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Kyungsoo Kim,et al. Comparison of Cervical Spine Biomechanics After Fixed- and Mobile-Core Artificial Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Analysis , 2011, Spine.
[2] J. Vital,et al. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up , 2009, European Spine Journal.
[3] J. Limbeek,et al. Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: A review , 2008, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.
[4] Y. Ra,et al. Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage. , 2008, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.
[5] P. Anderson,et al. Motion Analysis of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Clinical Trial , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.
[6] Xinghuo Wu,et al. Early and Intermediate Follow-up Results After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single- and Multiple-Level , 2008, Spine.
[7] Keung Nyun Kim,et al. Early Clinical Experience with the Mobi-C Disc Prosthesis , 2007, Yonsei medical journal.
[8] S. Yi,et al. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.
[9] R. Hurlbert,et al. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.
[10] G. Pickett,et al. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.
[11] W. Sears,et al. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.
[12] Regis W Haid,et al. The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.
[13] Jan Goffin,et al. Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.
[14] Jan Goffin,et al. Intermediate Follow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-Level and Bi-Level , 2003, Spine.
[15] Tae-Hong Lim,et al. Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion , 2002, Spine.
[16] F. Van Calenbergh,et al. Preliminary Clinical Experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis , 2002, Neurosurgery.
[17] A. Hilibrand,et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[18] R. A. Davis,et al. A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. , 1996, Surgical neurology.
[19] D. Prolo,et al. Toward Uniformity in Evaluating Results of Lumbar Spine Operations: A Paradigm Applied to Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions , 1986, Spine.
[20] R. B. Cloward. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.
[21] R. Robinson,et al. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[22] L. Raghuram,et al. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.
[23] Ilana Langdon,et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.