Comparative Analysis of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Using Two Types of Artificial Cervical Discs: Bryan® versus Mobi-C®

154 Korean J Spine 8(3) September 2011 ● Received: May 2, 2011 ● Revised: July 6, 2011 ● Accepted: July 11, 2011 Corresponding Author: Woo-Kyung Kim, MD, PhD Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University, Gil Hospital, 1198, Guwol 1-dong, Namdong-Gu, Incheon 405-760, Korea Tel: +82-32-460-3304, Fax: +82-32-460-3899 E-mail: wkkim@gilhospital.com Comparative Analysis of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Using Two Types of Artificial Cervical Discs: BryanR versus Mobi-CR

[1]  Kyungsoo Kim,et al.  Comparison of Cervical Spine Biomechanics After Fixed- and Mobile-Core Artificial Disc Replacement: A Finite Element Analysis , 2011, Spine.

[2]  J. Vital,et al.  Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C®) with up to 2 years of follow-up , 2009, European Spine Journal.

[3]  J. Limbeek,et al.  Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: A review , 2008, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[4]  Y. Ra,et al.  Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage. , 2008, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[5]  P. Anderson,et al.  Motion Analysis of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter, Clinical Trial , 2008, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[6]  Xinghuo Wu,et al.  Early and Intermediate Follow-up Results After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single- and Multiple-Level , 2008, Spine.

[7]  Keung Nyun Kim,et al.  Early Clinical Experience with the Mobi-C Disc Prosthesis , 2007, Yonsei medical journal.

[8]  S. Yi,et al.  Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty , 2006, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[9]  R. Hurlbert,et al.  Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. , 2006, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  G. Pickett,et al.  Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[11]  W. Sears,et al.  Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. , 2004, Neurosurgical focus.

[12]  Regis W Haid,et al.  The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[13]  Jan Goffin,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[14]  Jan Goffin,et al.  Intermediate Follow-up After Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease With the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-Level and Bi-Level , 2003, Spine.

[15]  Tae-Hong Lim,et al.  Biomechanical Study on the Effect of Cervical Spine Fusion on Adjacent-Level Intradiscal Pressure and Segmental Motion , 2002, Spine.

[16]  F. Van Calenbergh,et al.  Preliminary Clinical Experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[17]  A. Hilibrand,et al.  Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[18]  R. A. Davis,et al.  A long-term outcome study of 170 surgically treated patients with compressive cervical radiculopathy. , 1996, Surgical neurology.

[19]  D. Prolo,et al.  Toward Uniformity in Evaluating Results of Lumbar Spine Operations: A Paradigm Applied to Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions , 1986, Spine.

[20]  R. B. Cloward The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. , 1958, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  R. Robinson,et al.  The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. , 1958, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  L. Raghuram,et al.  Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  Ilana Langdon,et al.  Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.