MR diskography and CT diskography with gadodiamide-iodinated contrast mixture for the diagnosis of foraminal impingement.

OBJECTIVE This study was designed to investigate whether the use of MR diskography would result in improved reader confidence over the use of CT diskography alone for evaluating foraminal impingement causing lumbar radiculopathy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Sixteen disk levels in 14 consecutive patients with suspected foraminal impingement causing lumbar radiculopathy were prospectively included in the study. A mixture of diluted gadodiamide and iodinated contrast material was injected at each disk level. After diskography, a CT scan (CT diskography) and T1-weighted fat-suppressed MR image (MR diskography) were obtained. Two spine radiologists and an orthopedic spine surgeon independently scored CT diskography and MR diskography for foraminal evaluation on a 3-point scale: 1, low confidence; 2, moderate confidence; and 3, high confidence. Each reader also assessed whether MR diskography showed an additional benefit over CT diskography with regard to the depiction of foraminal abnormalities only. Another radiologist reviewed conventional MR images focused on disk height and morphology. RESULTS The reviewers' confidence scores for MR diskography were superior to those for CT diskography (reader 1, p = 0.00008; reader 2, p = 0.0008; reader 3, p = 0.0015) (p < 0.05). MR diskography was considered beneficial in 13 of 16 disk levels (reader 1), 14 of 16 (reader 2), and 14 of 16 (reader 3). MR diskography increased the confidence scores for the detection of foraminal impingement, especially in cases of severe disk degeneration, but did not show additional benefits in cases of an extensive vacuum in the disk or large disk extrusion. CONCLUSION Simultaneous MR diskography and CT diskography with a mixture of gadodiamide and iodinated contrast material may be beneficial for evaluating foraminal impingement causing lumbar radiculopathy.

[1]  Y. Safriel,et al.  Gadolinium use in spine procedures for patients with allergy to iodinated contrast--experience of 127 procedures. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  B. Hamm,et al.  Percutaneous discography: comparison of low-dose CT, fluoroscopy and MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc disruption , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[3]  M. Ochi,et al.  Clinical Characterizations and Radiologic Findings of Pure Foraminal-Type Cervical Disc Herniation: CT Discography as a Useful Adjuvant in Its Precise Diagnosis , 2005, Spine.

[4]  Jan Goffin,et al.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Interbody Fusion of the Cervical Spine , 2004, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  M. R. Schmid,et al.  Cartilage lesions in the ankle joint: comparison of MR arthrography and CT arthrography , 2003, Skeletal Radiology.

[6]  D. Resnick,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Discography in Cadavers: Tears of the Annulus Fibrosus , 2003, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[7]  F. Falco,et al.  Lumbar Discography Using Gadolinium in Patients With Iodine Contrast Allergy Followed by Postdiscography Computed Tomography Scan , 2003, Spine.

[8]  J. Zucherman,et al.  Gadopentetate Dimeglumine as an Intradiscal Contrast Agent , 2002, Spine.

[9]  R. Herzog,et al.  MR lumbar discography with intradiscal gadolinium in patients with severe anaphylactoid reaction to iodinated contrast material. , 2002, Pain medicine.

[10]  D. Fardon,et al.  Nomenclature and classification of lumbar disc pathology. Recommendations of the Combined task Forces of the North American Spine Society, American Society of Spine Radiology, and American Society of Neuroradiology. , 2001, Spine.

[11]  P. Kambin,et al.  Nucleus Pulposus Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report , 1995, Spine.

[12]  M. Funke,et al.  MR arthrography of the shoulder with gadopentetate dimeglumine: influence of concentration, iodinated contrast material, and time on signal intensity. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  E. V. D. Kelft,et al.  Diagnostic imaging algorithm for cervical soft disc herniation. , 1994 .

[14]  D Resnick,et al.  Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. , 1992, Radiology.

[15]  T. Bernard,et al.  Lumbar Discography Followed by Computed Tomography: Refining the Diagnosis of Low-Back Pain , 1990, Spine.

[16]  V. Mooney,et al.  Pain Provocation and Disc Deterioration by Age: A CT/Discography Study in a Low-Back Pain Population , 1989, Spine.

[17]  V. Mooney,et al.  Disc Deterioration in Low-Back Syndromes: A Prospective, Multi-Center CT/Discography Study , 1988, Spine.

[18]  V. Mooney,et al.  A Comparison of CT/Discography, Pain Response and Radiographic Disc Height , 1988, Spine.

[19]  R. G. Johnson,et al.  Dallas Discogram Description A New Classification of CT/Discography in Low‐back Disorders , 1987, Spine.

[20]  I. Macnab Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  A. Wagner Gadolinium diskography. , 2004, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[22]  J. Tehranzadeh,et al.  Discography 2000. , 1998, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[23]  M. Nakamura,et al.  MRI of cervical intervertebral discs in asymptomatic subjects. , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.