The effect of statistical methods and study reporting characteristics on the number of citations: A study of four general psychiatric journals

This paper investigates how the use of different statistical methods and study design characteristics affected the number of citations in psychiatric journals. Original research articles (N=448) from four psychiatric journals were reviewed. Aspects measured included the use of statistical methodology, presentation of results, description of procedures, country of the corresponding author and number of the authors. The use of statistical methods was not strongly associated with the further utilisation of an article. The effect was low compared to the impact of correspondence address or number of authors. Extended description of statistical procedures and an experimental study design had a positive effect to the received citations.

[1]  P. Nieminen,et al.  Type of empirical research reports as an explanatory factor in citation performance of psychiatric research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[2]  H. Pincus,et al.  Trends in research in two general psychiatric journals in 1969-1990: research on research. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  M. Isohanni,et al.  The use of bibliometric data in evaluating research on therapeutic community for addictions and in psychiatry. , 1997, Substance use & misuse.

[4]  H. Herbertz,et al.  Does it pay to cooperate? A bibliometric case study in molecular biology , 1995, Scientometrics.

[5]  D L Streiner,et al.  Speaking Graphically: An Introduction to Some Newer Graphing Techniques , 1997, Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie.

[6]  Bluma C. Peritz On the heuristic value of scientific publications and their design; A citation analysis of some clinical trials , 2005, Scientometrics.

[7]  Pentti Nieminen,et al.  Bias against European journals in medical publication databases , 1999, The Lancet.

[8]  David Adam,et al.  Citation analysis: The counting house , 2002, Nature.

[9]  S. Mcguigan The use of Statistics in the British Journal of Psychiatry , 1995, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[10]  L. Leaverton The use of statistics. , 1970, Journal of the Iowa Medical Society.

[11]  A. Cawkell Science Citation Index , 1970, Nature.

[12]  Paul Nicholls,et al.  Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science , 1991 .

[13]  Hajime Eto,et al.  Bibliometric Distance between Methodology and Application in Statistics , 2000, Scientometrics.

[14]  E Garfield,et al.  Which medical journals have the greatest impact? , 1986, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  An Introduction to Informetrics , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[18]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science , 1990 .

[19]  Marc Luwel,et al.  Is the science citation index US-biased? , 1999, Scientometrics.

[20]  D G Altman,et al.  Statistics in medical journals: developments in the 1980s. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[21]  J. Miettunen,et al.  Statistical methodology in general psychiatric journals , 2002, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[22]  G. Lloyd,et al.  Citation trends of general psychiatric journals , 1989, Psychological Medicine.

[23]  Nikita A. Zorin,et al.  Mathematical methods in psychiatric papers , 2006, Scientometrics.

[24]  Publication trends of papers on schizophrenia , 1997, British Journal of Psychiatry.